Last Update 16:1
Tuesday, 16 October 2018

Dialogue on Egypt parliament law reforms hampered by disagreement

Prime Minister Ibrahim Mahlab will meet with political forces again on Thursday to discuss the necessary legal amendments

Gamal Essam El-Din , Tuesday 7 Apr 2015
Egyptian parliament (Photo:Reuters)
File photo: Egyptian parliament (Photo:Reuters) (Photo:Reuters)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2677
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2677

A meeting aimed at eliminating constitutional gridlocks standing in the way of Egypt's long-delayed parliamentary elections ended abruptly on Tuesday amid verbal clashes and acrimony.

Minister of Parliamentary Affairs Ibrahim El-Heneidy told reporters that Prime Minister Ibrahim Mahlab was forced to end the meeting with political parties and other national figures after verbal clashes erupted among the attendees.

The elections were due to begin on 21 March but were postponed after a court ruling found the electoral constituencies law, by which the electoral districts for the election were to be allocated, to be unconstitutional. The elections would be the first parliamentary polls since the 2013 ouster of President Mohamed Morsi.

El-Heneidy said the meeting began calmly and continued quietly for two hours, but at the third hour verbal clashes flared.

The first clash flared up when Mahmoud Farghal, chairman of the Social Justice Party, was given the floor. Instead of presenting his party's proposed amendments to the law, Farghal launched a scathing attack on "the Muslim Brotherhood and its ideological partners."

The Social Justice Party was set up under the regime of former president Hosni Mubarak.

Directing his words at Mahlab, Farghal stressed that "Egypt's coming parliament must not include any Muslim Brotherhood remnants or Salafist elements."

"We should take the utmost care in amending laws in order not to allow Muslim brothers and Salafists to infiltrate the coming parliament in any way," said Farghal.

Ashraf Thabet, the deputy chairman of the Salafist Nour Party, objected to the mention of Salafists, saying that "Farghal's words contain an unacceptable remark."

"In a national dialogue meeting, all participants must respect each other and should rather focus on presenting their proposed amendments to election laws," he said.

Thabet strongly denied that the Nour Party is a religious party, adding that most Salafists sided with the majority of Egyptians in ousting former Islamist President Mohamed Morsi in 2013 and putting an end to the one-year rule of Muslim Brotherhood.

The spat heated up when Nagi El-Shehabi, chairman of Al-Geel Party (Generation Party) and a long-time parliamentarian who had served as an MP both before and after the 2011 revolution, intervened, asking Farghal to stop his "random attacks".

Farghal responded by lashing out at El-Shehabi, describing him as "a Muslim Brotherhood loyalist who should keep silent."

Joining the fray, Alaa Abdel-Azim, secretary-general of the Free Republican Party, accused Mahlab and his government of doing their best to delay parliamentary elections.

"This government has never taken any serious step towards creating a powerful parliament or establishing a real multi-party system," said Abdel-Azim.

The accusations drew a quick response from Mahlab. "The government is doing its best to meet an ambitious economic and political agenda," he told the group.

"In our meetings we should rather respect each other and we hope that the next parliamentary elections will be a new Egyptian experience in democracy and party life," he said.

A third argument erupted when high-profile film director Khaled Youssef and Khaled Dawoud, spokesman of the liberal Constitution Party, objected to a review delivered by Salah Fawzi, a constitutional law professor and a member of a government committee in charge of amending election laws.

Fawzi rejected any radical changes to the electoral constituencies law, urging all instead to build on "what was ruled constitutional by the Supreme Constitutional Court."

Youssef and Dawoud agreed that "the word 'constitutional' could signal that there is no real wish for change."

"If the committee has already rejected any proposals for changing the party list constituencies, what then is the benefit of our attending this meeting?" asked Dawoud.

Several political parties, including the Constitution Party, have repeatedly asked the government to change the constituencies law to allow increasing the number of seats allocated to party-based candidates from 120 and 180 and allow political parties to be represented in parliament in proportion to the votes they receive, rather than allow the party winning more than 50 per cent of the votes to take all the seats in the constituency.

Mahlab said after the meeting that the disputes should not stand in the way of continuing the dialogue between the government and political forces.

The prime minister said he is ready to attend a third round of national dialogue meetings on Thursday in a bid to reach consensus over electoral reforms necessary to pave the way for the country's long-awaited parliamentary elections.

"We are all one family and we all hope that parliamentary elections will be held as soon as possible," he added.

Mahlab said he has high hopes that parliamentary elections will kick off before the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, scheduled to begin on 18 June. Mahlab also joined forces with Fawzi, stressing that "the priority should be given to amending law articles ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Constitutional Court while keeping the constitutional articles in place."

Margaret Azer, a former Wafd Party official, told reporters that the national dialogue meeting on Tuesday was frustrating.

"Strong differences among political parties over election laws and lack of good debate led the meeting to degenerate into bad verbal clashes that could adversely affect the image of political parties into the eyes of most Egyptians," said Azer, adding that "political parties with personal interests and foreign agendas should be excluded from such national dialogue meetings."

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
5



fm
08-04-2015 12:45pm
0-
0+
all blacklisted are together
all blackisted by public together they are rejected by Egyptian
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
4



Sam Enslow
08-04-2015 07:43am
0-
2+
Question
I do not understand the 'party list' concept. Shouldn't members of Parliament represent the people living in the district that elects them? A problem in Egypt for centuries is that politicians focus on what Cairo thinks rather than what the people who elected them want. Individual seats would allow parties to concentrate their efforts in districts where they have a chance to win. Like minded parties could then form power blocks in the new Parliament. It seems the parties are attempting to take power away from the people and place it in parties.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
3



Zaman
08-04-2015 06:12am
8-
0+
By force members
There are no one have any abality to make free and fair law all crucks and corrupts
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



neil
08-04-2015 12:50am
0-
3+
same old story
How was this 'national dialogue' any different than the one by Morsi? A beleaguered head of government defends the indefensible (the most undemocratic voting system on the planet) (this offence to human reason being no fault whatsoever of the very capable prime minister)), which is also declared a fait accompli. Participants, major stakeholders, who have been completely ignored in the decision-making process, are told to imagine their country is at war, that is, they must rally around the flag, actually to save the face of those whose hubris led to their predicament. Youssef and Dawoud are right to fight for a new Egypt, just as right now as with Morsi. A true patriot will not allow for a 'constitutional' order where laws seemingly pulled out of thin air are pronounced as fait accompli. Post- January 25 Egyptians should not be asked to be part of Kabuki theater 'elections' with parliaments presumed to be rubber stamps.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



Zaman
07-04-2015 10:59pm
8-
0+
By force members
All those are enemies of faith full Egyptian they imports from usa and EU .. They are damaging Egypt unity
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.