Last Update 22:6
Friday, 18 October 2019

Witnesses to Friday Tahrir clashes pin blame on Muslim Brotherhood

Handful of protesters injured in recent Tahrir Square clashes allege that members of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood were ultimately responsible for Friday's violence

Randa Ali , Sunday 14 Oct 2012
Conference
Mohamed Waked (L) , Rasha Azab and Dr Yehia Salah (Photo: Randa Ali)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2869
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2869

The Egyptian Journalists Syndicate hosted a press conference on Sunday at which several eyewitnesses to Friday's clashes – and some of those injured therein – told their version of events, with many pinning the blame on the Muslim Brotherhood.

The conference was organised by several post-revolution political forces, including the National Front for Justice and Democracy and the Popular Committee for Defending the Revolution.

"Egyptian television was reporting that the Muslim Brotherhood had not mobilised on the streets, while at the same time we were being beaten by the Brotherhood's militias," activist Rasha Azzab, who was in Tahrir Square from 12pm to 6pm, alleged.

Azzab, who had been far from the square when the clashes erupted, said she had not believed reports that Brotherhood activists were attacking protesters until she reached the flashpoint square and saw members of the group wielding batons and stones and chanting "God is great; Purge the square of the traitors."

"For those who are surprised that the Brotherhood is acting like this, it's because they want to consolidate their power," Azzab claimed.

Dr Yehia Salah, who is known for treating many of the protesters who received eye injuries during last year's uprising, was also present at Sunday's press conference. His son was hit in the head with a stone during Friday's clashes.

"He was hit while urging people to stop fighting," Salah alleged, noting that the clashes had left over 150 injured. "Someone hit him with a large stone from a short distance, which caused a fracture to his skull."

A number of other people injured during the clashes also shared their own personal accounts of the day's events.

"I was participating in a march organised by the Popular Egyptian Current, the logo of which I wore on my arm," said Nashwa Rashad, pointing to her left arm, now in a sling.  

As she reached Tahrir Square, she went on to recount, stones were being thrown everywhere.

"I was face-to-face with a Muslim Brotherhood member who I know from earlier protests," Rashad alleged. "He ripped the logo off of my arm and cursed me. When I cursed him back, he hit me in the stomach with a big stone."

With black eyes and his head wrapped in bandages, Reda Abdel-Latif accused Brotherhood members of beating him up near the Egyptian Museum and calling him an "infidel" for running an anti-Brotherhood Facebook page.

"I was never before beaten by the Muslim Brotherhood," said a visibly distraught Abdel-Latif, before hurriedly leaving the press conference.

Mohamed Waked, a leading member of the National Front for Justice and Democracy, blamed both the Muslim Brotherhood and President Morsi for Friday's debacle.

"A protest was planned two weeks ago to push for several demands and to hold Morsi accountable for what they saw as his failure in his first 100 days as president, which is their right as opposition in a democratic state," Waked stated.

"The Muslim Brotherhood chose to hold a protest on the same day, and that, too, is their right," he added. "But it's not their right to protest the chants of other groups; they objected to any slogans that weren't to their liking."

"Before 3pm, the protests did not seem orchestrated; not all those taking part were Brotherhood members," conceded Waked, who went on to allege that, at roughly 4pm, a pre-planned assault was launched from the premises of the nearby museum.

"This coincided with a tweet by Muslim Brotherhood leader Essam El-Erian, in which he called on group members to meet at the museum," Waked said.

As clashes escalated on Friday, El-Erian urged Brotherhood members via Twitter to gather at the Egyptian Museum for a 4pm march on Egypt's Supreme Court.

Brotherhood members, for their part, have denied responsibility for the clashes, attributing the attacks to unknown assailants. 

Waked went on to question why Morsi's decision to replace the prosecutor-general had been postponed to before the protest when it was subsequently announced that the decision had first been issued 15 days ago.

"We will shout whatever slogans we want," said Waked, stressing that any attempt to stifle protest or free expression would be doomed to failure. "The last one who tried to do so is now in prison," he added, in reference to ousted president Mubarak.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
4



M V L
15-10-2012 02:48pm
0-
1+
Difficult but also opportunity
In most democracies there are more than one presidential candidate. The candidate who wins has the majority of the votes however feeble that majority may be. So mathematically speaking a president can be elected with 50.1% of the vote. This means that 49.9 % did not vote for him. Yet once elected the duty of the president is to 100% the country and not to the 50.1% who elected him. How should and can a president act when the majority that elected him acts unlawfully? Does he respect the principles of law or does he look to protect his votes for a second term? I would suggest to do whatever is right - a president should be known to stand above divisions. He is in a unique position to bring the people together regardless of his own background. I wish the President all good fortune in doing so isa.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
3



Omar Habal, Cairo
15-10-2012 10:42am
0-
2+
PM Qandeel
We ask you to address the 3 millions orphans in the streets. They are growing and became a serious social disease. Majority of Egyptian Msulims do not understand Islam. Shame on our Islamic leaders. The prophet (SAWS) was an orphan and ask us to care about the,
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



Aladdine, Egypt
15-10-2012 10:37am
0-
1+
Shabehaa of 3 millions strong
I was theri! Brotherhood cultis use the homeless boys in the front. Shame on our society for not caring about the 3 million orphans. The are growing now and represent threat to society. It is non-Islamic behavior. You fight for Islamic Title and the nation does not behave like one. Shame on you alland welfare ministry! AO: You may address the 3 million homeless orphans. Allah AKbe Ya Beni Misr
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



Saad Murad, Cauiro
14-10-2012 08:25pm
5-
2+
Islam vs. the left
witnesses who are anti-brotherhood and who would lie as they do in order to tarnish the MB. The Left has lost all credibility. Period.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.