Last Update 20:10
Morsi's constitutional declaration threatens the stability of the country
The constitutional declaration and the president's manner of dealing with the crisis reflects the deep rift between Islamists and the opposition
Khaled Fahmy , Tuesday 4 Dec 2012
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1612

I must admit that events over the past ten days have dissipated much of my optimism since the revolution.

My optimism primarily stemmed from my conviction that Mubarak’s formula (either oppression or ruin) is a wretched one that is unbecoming of us. As a people and a country, we can handle the challenges of the revolution and the institutions we built in our modern times – the police, army, judiciary, press, universities, unions and state bureaucracy – may require restructuring, but they are solid and can withstand the rigours of the revolution.

I also believed that we are capable of handling our two most challenging obstacles: how to eject the military from politics and the need to include the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in the political process. I am adamant that the brass are much weaker than they appear, and their normal and proper place is in their barracks not managing the political process.

As for the Brotherhood and other political Islam groups, I believe – despite my strong doubts that these groups have solutions for the country’s intractable problems – that it is more constructive and better for our society to include them in the political process.

The strong base on which I built my optimism is my conviction that what gathers all of us –Muslims and Christians alike– are bigger than our divisions and the harmony we achieved as a society over the past two centuries is a genuine accomplishment we must uphold and cherish.

At the same time, I always felt that Egypt is generous and embracing of us all without oppression, injustice or exclusion.

But since President Morsi issued his constitutional declaration, I find myself losing much of my optimism and am becoming concerned about the stability of our country more than at any previous time since the revolution.

My concerns do not only stem from the serious violations of law and legtimacy that this declaration represents, but also the debates and discussions that followed and ones I participated in about this serious crisis with members of political Islam such as the Brotherhood, Al-Gamaa Al-Islamiya and Salafists.

These discussions revealed that the differences that divide us are far greater than I thought, and that the current crisis and how the president is handling it deepens these rifts instead of closing them.

There are many points of contention that separate Islamists from their partners in the homeland who are liberals, secularists, leftists and others. I will focus on four points that I believe are the axis and the heart of this crisis regarding the nature of Egypt’s judicial system and how to reform it.

First, President Morsi – and by extension the Freedom and Justice Party and the Brotherhood – prioritises judicial reform and engaging on this controversial issue rather than first dealing with the security apparatus and restructuring the Ministry of Interior. Although there have been many assertions by human rights groups and political parties that democratic transition first and foremost requires restructuring the security sector, President Morsi – for his own political reasons – chose to begin with the judiciary.

Second, related to the above, this preference stemmed from the belief of the president and his group that it is vital to protect the Constituent Assembly (CA) and pass the constitution by any means possible, even if this constitutional declaration diminishes the legitimacy of the president and increases tensions in society, as well as violating the rule of law.

Although it is easy to poke holes in the proposed constitution, the nature of the constitution itself is a point of dispute between Islamists and civil forces. While Islamists believe the constitution is a significant document because it is an expression of society’s true and genuine identity, civil forces believe the premise of the constitution should be to protect citizens and guarantee their rights while curbing the powers of the state and blocking its dominance.

Third, in many of my discussions with political Islam advocates, I found that they have no regard for the heritage of Egyptian judiciary in modern times, and how quickly they are willing to sacrifice it since they view it as the outcome of two centuries of cultural invasion by the West. The West’s assault was assisted by an out-of-touch political and legal elite that are captivated by the West, and indifferent to its own jurisprudence heritage and sharia.

On the contrary, many civil forces believe Egypt’s judiciary is a key achievement in the country’s modern history that does not contradict sharia, because it is built on a hybrid of sharia and law in a creative and innovative way similar to many legal systems throughout Islam’s long history.

Also, although marred by some defects, these should not be dealt with the logic of “destroying the temple over everyone’s head” as the president has done in his showdown with the judiciary.

Fourth, these discussions also revealed the depth of the dispute between Islamists and civil forces about the manner of protesting or objecting to the president’s declaration. Islamists, especially the Brotherhood, believe that the president should be supported through this crisis. Despite the nature of disputes over the declaration, not one single Brotherhood member has uttered an objection to this problematic declaration or criticised it. Instead, the president is often described as a captain navigating rough seas and therefore his decisions should not be opposed or else we will all perish.

On the contrary, many democratic forces believe that disagreeing with the president – any president – and publically airing these differences is not only a healthy exercise but a necessary one, especially in times of crises. In crises, the president, any president, needs someone to confront him with what he does not want to hear and explain to him what he may not see or consider.

The president should not be compared to a captain but to a senior executive at a large and complex department who is subject to laws and regulations, assisted by his subordinates and aides, and accountable to everyone in his actions and decisions.

The dispute between the Islamists and their partners in the homeland on how to deal with President Morsi because of his manner of handling this crisis not only demonstrates the disparity in support for the president, but also reveals two very diverse approaches on how to deal with those in power and the need to prevent them from dominating society.

Despite these deep rifts between Islamists and civil forces that were uncovered in the recent crisis, I still believe that what unites us as Egyptians is far greater and deeper than what separates us. I also believe we must close this gap which threatens the stability of the country and increases divisions in society – most importantly, that the president must withdraw his noxious constitutional declaration and show he is willing to understand why so many are protesting his declaration.

Not everyone who objected to it is fulul (part of the former regime); in fact, the majority of them are revolutionaries who want this revolution to succeed and protect the unity of society.

No one is asking the president to abandon his predilections and beliefs; we are asking him to listen to everyone and pay attention more to the opinion of those who disagree than to the opinion of those who agree with him. We want him to act as the president of all Egyptians, not the representative of one segment only.

The writer is the head of History Department at the AUC.





Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 50 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
5



mumby
08-12-2012 10:19am
1-
1+
Be realistic
You have got some good views but many of journalists don't like writing article about how to build Egypt,burst discipline,self refrain,respect each other and be realistic about freedom and democracy.Many of them dream absolute freedom of press up to violate local and Islamic values.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
4



Ahmed Salam
06-12-2012 10:22pm
2-
8+
Democracy
Mr. Morsi is elected in a democratic election. The opposition leaders has lost the public mandate. The FJP in parliment has the majority. A number of times the oppsition rejected the efforts to agree on a constitution. The opposition seems to create problems instead of joining hands to develop & take Egypt forward. If they disagree with something they should try to change the public mandate not by protesting voilently. Morsi has said the constitutional declaration is temporary and he is right to say, "if the people vote for new constitution it will be approved". Let the people decide. the minorities can not impose their decision on the majority and that is what democracy is. About the concerns on Islamic sharia law, it is shame that the muslims are protesting against it, where as it is this sharia which gave human beings the right to live peacefully irrespective of their believes, colar, gender. they belong. Gentlemen sharia is given by your Creator & He knows what is good for you. Be
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
3



Nora
06-12-2012 04:42am
2-
17+
Morsi's constitutional declaration threatens the stability of the country
If I may reword your title to "Morsi breaths, I am not stable". Mr. Fahmy, You really do not like him breaths, period. There is nothing Morsi can do, or say to achieve your satisfaction. I hope that you can come clean with that declaration in your next article. We are tried of pseudo freedom fighters.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



Ansari
05-12-2012 01:59am
1-
12+
Morsi's constitutional declaration threatens to the enemies of Egypt and democracy
Hey Fahmy, you are head history department at AUC, you dont sound like that responsible. If you are confident that majority is with who disagree with president, then why fear, let it to the vote. You are a lier, you know that majority is with the president and you dont want to acknowledge. No one is asking the president to abandon his predilections and beliefs; we are asking him to listen to everyone and respect the opinion of those who disagree with him since their numbers are greater than those who agree with him. We want him to act as the president of all Egyptians, not the representative of one segment only.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Rene
07-12-2012 09:58pm
1-
2+
Are there anything going wrong in this constitution?
As a foreigner I read the constitution and didn't find anything going wrong. There's no single item in it that expands the power of the president. Plus, people's freedom are guaranteed in this document. This constitution will not bring Egypt into an Islamic state, and why have such fear? I simply don't understand why protesters say this constitution undemocratic.
Khaled Fahmy
06-12-2012 08:52pm
1-
0+
There was a problem in the translation
Dear Reader, You are right in raising this point. However, the passage you object too was originally mistranslated. It used to read: "No one is asking the president to abandon his predilections and beliefs; we are asking him to listen to everyone and respect the opinion of those who disagree with him since their numbers are greater than those who agree with him." It has now been corrected to read: "No one is asking the president to abandon his predilections and beliefs; we are asking him to listen to everyone and pay attention more to the opinion of those who disagree than to the opinion of those who agree with him." I spotted this mistake which, as I said is a mistranslation from theoriginal Arabic, and the editorial team changed it immediately. Yu can check the orginal Arabic in al Shorouk newspaper of 2 December.
1



Khalid Orabi
04-12-2012 06:29pm
11-
14+
Mubarak had to act the way he did
I beg to disagree. Mursi had to preempt a possible coup by the constitutional court, which is Mubarak's court. He had to to protect the revolution from Israel's and America's agents.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment

© 2010 Ahram Online. Advertising