Last Update 21:41
Sunday, 21 July 2019

The danger of private media in Egypt

Private media is in the grip of a new elite whose political interests are inimical to media freedoms and the aspirations of the people

Mohamed Shuman , Saturday 15 Feb 2014
Share/Bookmark
Views: 3821
Share/Bookmark
Views: 3821

Ten years ago, I warned against exchanging state hegemony for the hegemony of businessmen and advertisers over Egyptian media. It seems that warning went unheeded. Regression occurred in media freedoms and codes of ethics. The irony lies in that this took place after the incomplete January 25 Revolution and its second wave on 30 June 2013.

State media remained subordinate to the authorities and unable to switch to a media that represents the whole society with its wide spectrum. Its ability to compete and influence public opinion diminished to the benefit of private media. A majority follow private channels and the circulation of privately owned newspapers witnessed a noticeable surge. There isn't enough space to expound on the reasons for this change, which definitely reduces the media capabilities and symbolic influence of the state over public opinion. Space also does not allow me to analyse the pros and cons of this change, which I deem more negative than positive, because private media hasn't respected media freedom and its multiplicity.

Thus, the private media and several Arab and foreign channels achieved progress over state media in the battle to win the hearts and minds of the masses. Meanwhile, the former was draining the material capacities and human capabilities available to the state and exploiting them for its own benefit. Private media depends on human cadres that were taught and trained in the state media. Even many who work for private media outlets still work in state newspapers and TV channels. This dubious and parasitic relationship reminds us of that between the private and public sector in the 1980s, culminating in privatisation, which I hope will not engulf the public media.

Researchers should study the private media's unilateral exploitation and looting of the fortunes of the state media. These fortunes could have been preserved and developed in order to transform it into a real public service. In spite of the potential, this mission has become difficult in the light of the predominance of Egyptian and Gulf "media capital," the growing influence of the private media and augmentation of networks of interests that protect it and provide its raison d'etre without bearing professional or social responsibilities.

Much evidence asserts that private media (newspapers and television channels) are in the grip of a few businessmen and advertising agencies, which play in the field of politics and propaganda more than they work in business or in media. This means that they don't aim at profit by owning a newspaper or a satellite channel; rather they acquire political status and use such media to intimidate opponents or get closer to the authorities.

The full evidence and observations cannot be listed due to space, but all of it asserts the fact that financing many newspapers and private satellite channels is absolutely disproportionate with its revenue from commercials or sales.

Egyptian and Gulf media capital transfers without accounting, transparency or checking into the sources of its funding and expenditure. Those increasing investments rely upon the idea that media is politics and industry. For owning and managing media is profitable in the field of advertisement and entertainment and offers a tremendous ability to form the interests and shape the views of the public. What is more important is gaining influence and moral authority in multiple aspects and levels, such as:

First: To get closer to prevailing powers in an attempt to contain it or strike a new partnership with it, and sometimes exerting pressure upon it in a way that prevents it from touching the interests of businessmen and the pattern of development and distribution of authority and wealth inherited from the Mubarak era. The problem here lies in the decline of the influence of state media and the prominence of the private media in the battle to influence public opinion and form its trends.

This in turn drove those in power after the January 25 Revolution to approach and cooperate with private media and wager on it. Thus, those in power approached indirectly businessmen who own this media and they became in time satellite stars, their news and statements about the public sphere published, paving the way, I presume, for them to enter the political arena as members of parliament or political leaders.

Second: Controlling the elite and media personalities through prevention or blocking those who have opposing opinions along with critical trends from appearing while allowing those who support or are pro-authority or the interests of businessmen. Let's remember that there was a time when a number of politicians who do not belong to the Muslim Brotherhood were jumping between channels and appearing in a repetitive and exaggerated way. Afterwards, those persons disappeared or were blocked according to undisclosed agreements or understandings between private and public satellite channels. There were satellite programme presenters and creative producers who used to appear before and after 25 January 2011; then programmes were cancelled for some or the promotion and propaganda shrank for others. Instead other programmes begun to be aired by new presenters with no professional training and media codes of ethics whatsoever. The aim is to have a domesticated political and media elite that lowers the ceiling of media freedom and becomes capable of influencing public opinion through intimidation, coaxing and manipulation of people's feelings and pains.

Third: Public opinion manipulation and disinformation in a way that suits the interests of businessmen and the ruling authority, whatever these are. This requires two things: firstly, it presumes that the masses are mindless idiots; consequently, there must be others who think instead of them, falsifying their awareness and tinkering with their emotions through a domesticated media and political elite.

Masses must be scared from and averse to the Muslim Brotherhood, 25 January revolutionaries and the revolution in all its meanings and aspects. For now is the time of legitimacy and building state institutions and its return in force in order to preserve the state and country against foreign plots.

Undoubtedly, people's fear of what happened in Syria, Iraq and Libya drives more citizens towards the military and the police, even if they committed excesses and errors, and even if we leave the state's institutions neither reformed nor renewed. Now, there is no voice that's louder than the voice of confronting the Muslim Brotherhood and eliminating terrorism.

Fourth: Restricting political action in media instigation and mobilisation; in other words, politics regarding the people's majority will become the passive reception of what private and public media broadcast, not participation in parties or even participation in elections. The parties are weak and the challenges of terrorism and the disturbing and idiotic Muslim Brotherhood activities shrink areas of political action. Thus, the media and talk shows become only misleading outlets for both the political elite and the people regarding political action and public debate. The masses follow in a passive way, and from one side. This in turn does not create an original and critical political and social awareness, because all that is presented is subject to the approaches and balances of the satellite channels' owners in most cases. This is in addition to self-censorship, preferences of every channel's crew on topics for discussion, and the chosen participants, which always concur with the preferences of those controlling the media, whether they are businessmen or advertisers.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
5



Hesham Tawfik
06-03-2014 01:36pm
0-
1+
Mixing between BUSINESS and MEDIA
Very good article Actually mixing Business and Media always bring leathal results So-called media workers bring shame to MASS MEDIA.Good Journalists suffer due to those who practise marketing in the name of journalism Thanks for the writer
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
4



J.M.Jordan
22-02-2014 09:04am
0-
0+
Saddest that the above mentioned hinders people coming to their senses.
Self-evident that who has much money and/or is trying to make it wants to use private media. However, what we are witnessing unfortunately in many countries is 1) the abuse of this power/wish for power to hinder peace, e.g. sacrificing all generations of a certain segment of the so-called Umma to not have peace, instead go on fighting in all their generations until the Day of Judgment: what madness, how inhumane... Instead of 2) using a.m. wealth to help the planets needy as Bill Gates and his wife do. And then hopefully to use the broad influence thus gained to get those in power to change the arable pattern so there's definitely more than today's 30% left after all planting for meatindustryfodder. Right now, there's only the life-style of hopefully more and more vegetarians to help the poorest of this world to hopefully some day get their chance of being full - once this totally insane and asocial use of arable land pattern will have 180° changed!
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
3



Bubbly
16-02-2014 09:03pm
284-
438+
For the Sake of stability
If we want estibiliy in Egypt, We must purge the Couprt Egyptian Media first and then Judiciary and Police.Egypt will become most stable and strong democratice country.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Allen
18-02-2014 12:11am
227-
124+
Bubbly your buddies the Muslim brotherhood already tried purging everything in sight
End result.... now they comfortably reside in cages where they belong.
2



SAWSAN MOSTAFA ALI
16-02-2014 12:35pm
307-
211+
MASS MEDIA
1- MASS MEDIA IS ONE OF THE STRONGEST TOOLS OF THE 4TH WAR TACTICS USED BY ALL ENEMIES OF EGYPT. 2- MASSES ARE AGAINST EKHWAN BECAUSE OF THEIR TERRORISM ACTS ALL OVER EGYPT SINCE THE 25TH OF JAN.2011. AND ALSO AGAINST WHO ARE CALLED"REVOLUTIONARIES " WHO ARE ACTUALLY TRAITORS AND AGENTS BEING TRAINED IN SIRBIA AND POLAND BY ZIOAMERICANS. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS NOT THE MEDIA THAT INFLUENCES THE POEPLE ----BUT THE FACTS. 3- THIS MESS IN MEDIA NECESSITATES HAVING A SUPREME COUNCIL FOR MEDIA TO PUT POLICY & PROCEDURES THAT REGULATES THIS UNBELIEVABLE MESS.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Ataraxis
24-02-2014 07:51pm
2-
10+
Traitors and agents?
You know, Ukraine's former president Yanukovych also called his revolutionary opponents traitors and foreign agents. How'd that work out for him? His real goal was to bilk Ukraine and kill off dissent. Labeling foes as foreign agents is an early step on the road to doing precisely that.
1



George Masri
15-02-2014 09:32pm
182-
204+
Egyptian media thrive on a culture of lying
honesty and Egyptian media are a contradiction in terms. The Egyptian media whether private or state-run has no credibility. This is why I stopped trusting the Egyptian media a long time ago. Hatred of political opponents fuels the Egyptian media. It simply lacks the ability to be honest.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.