Cairo, Khartoum cooperating on Nile issue: Sudanese FM

Sudanese foreign minister says President Morsi's trip to Khartoum will open door to increased bilateral cooperation between Arab neighbours

Ahram Online , Friday 5 Apr 2013,
Morsi, Al-Bashir
This image released by the Egyptian Presidency shows Mohammed Morsi greeting dignitaries after Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir, left, received him at the airport in Khartoum, Sudan, Thursday, April 4, 2013 (Photo: AP)

Cooperation between Egypt and Sudan over the Nile River is moving in a positive direction, Sudanese Foreign Minister Ali Karti said on Thursday in comments reported by state news agency MENA.

On the sidelines of Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi's visit to Khartoum, Karti told reporters the visit would open new prospects for bilateral cooperation.

There had been tensions between the countries during the Mubarak era.

Sudan is an important ally for Egypt because of its agricultural potential and Egypt's need to secure an acceptable agreement with upstream Nile countries over vital water supplies.

Morsi's two-day visit is the first to Sudan since he was elected president last June. He is holding talks with his counterpart Omar Al-Bashir, along with business people and political party leaders.

According to AFP, Morsi's office said the visit had "particular importance because it is the first of its kind since the president took office, and is aimed at stressing the special and strong strategic relationship between Egypt and Sudan."

Cairo is keen to establish "a real economic partnership with Sudan, to meet the ambitions and goals of growth and prosperity for both peoples," it added.

Morsi's visit would "complete some issues that have already been agreed" when the two leaders held talks in Cairo last September, Bashir's press secretary said.

These include trade integration, transport, investment, and the "four freedoms" pact, which gives citizens of each country the right to freely enter and conduct economic activities in the other. It has not been fully implemented.

The Entebbe dilemma

Karti's comments on the Nile issue came one week after the two-year-old South Sudanese state announced joining the Cooperative Framework Agreement of the Nile Basin Countries, known as the Entebbe agreement.

“We joined the Nile Basin Initiative. We are on the way to joining the framework agreement, through which Nile Basin countries can discuss the best ways to use water sources,” Paul Mayom, South Sudan’s minister of water resources and irrigation, told a radio station on 26 March.

The Entebbe agreement was signed in April 2010 by Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, and Rwanda, and then on 28 February 2011, Burundi became the sixth signatory.

Egypt, the main opponent of the deal, argues that a 1959 agreement, as well as another accord signed in 1929 under British rule, stipulate the approval of all Nile Basin states must be gained before the implementation of any water-utilisation projects.

Egyptian officials have said the new agreement by upstream counties does not affect the legal stance of Egypt and Sudan as downstream states.

However, the six countries that signed the Entebbe agreement reject such reasoning, and remind the Egyptians that the 1929 and 1959 agreements are "void and invalid" because they were written and ratified under British colonialism.

Egypt, which receives the largest portion of the Nile’s water, has rejected any deals that do not preserve its "historic rights."

Egypt's share of Nile waters is 51 billion square metres annually, according to a deal signed with Sudan on 1959, which gives the latter 18 billion square meters of water per year.

Short link:



  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
David wrote:
08-04-2013 02:54am

water flows downstream

While the cooperation between Sudan and Egypt is to be commended, it would be wise to include the upstream countries. After all, water flows from upstream to downstream. As the upstream countries are growing economically, God forbid there is an environmental disaster / toxic pollution on the Nile. Egypt and Sudan should be actively engaged to reach an agreement with the rest of upstream countries as soon as possible so the Nile can be managed as a team.
Zola wrote:
05-04-2013 04:51pm

Policy inconsistency

In the ground it appears that a real confrontation is likely sooner than later as the upstream countries, as source of the Nile, are resolute in and have conretely begun utilizing it. We heard months ago that Egypt can cooperate with the upstreams in using the Nile, whereas in Khartum, as the above news carries, it sounds as if the issue is a mere theoretical disagreement. A civilized and rational dialogue would be the only wayout. Courting Sudan alone wouldn't serve a thing as far as the Nile is concerned.

More news

Group A W D L P
3 0 0 9
1 1 1 4
DR Congo
1 0 2 3
0 1 2 1
Group B W D L P
2 1 0 7
2 0 1 6
1 1 1 4
0 0 3 0
Group C W D L P
3 0 0 9
2 0 1 6
1 0 2 3
0 0 3 0
Group D W D L P
3 0 0 9
Cote d'Ivoire
2 0 1 6
South Africa
1 0 2 3
0 0 3 0
Group E W D L P
2 1 0 7
0 3 0 3
0 2 1 2
0 2 1 2
Group F W D L P
1 2 0 5
1 2 0 5
0 3 0 3
Guinea Bissau
0 1 2 1