Last Update 3:10
Thursday, 21 September 2017

Selection of firm for Renaissance Dam impact study delayed: Egypt official

Egypt has repeatedly voiced anxiety that the Ethiopian dam, when finished, will reduce its water supply

Ahram Online , Monday 9 Mar 2015
Ethiopia
A general view shows construction activity on the Grand Renaissance dam in Guba Woreda, Benishangul Gumuz region March 16, 2014 (Photo: Reuters)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1146
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1146

Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia's tripartite expert committee has delayed choosing a consulting firm to conduct an environmental impact study of Ethiopia's Grand Renaissance Dam, Egypt’s state news agency MENA reported on Monday.

Last year, the three countries agreed to choose a consulting firm to assess the environmental impacts of Ethiopia building the controversial dam on the Blue Nile, the Nile’s largest tributary.

The selection process has been ongoing for months.

Egypt has repeatedly voiced anxiety that the dam, to include a 74 billion cubic metre reservoir on the Blue Nile when finished, will adversely affect its water supply.

Addis Ababa has however claimed that the dam will not harm downstream countries Egypt and Sudan, and has continued construction.

Four consulting companies have been shortlisted and each country has examined their offers separately, Alaa Yassin, spokesperson for the Ethiopian dam issue at Egypt's irrigation ministry, told MENA.

In a third round of talks in Khartoum that ended on Sunday, the three countries concluded that several enquiries of the four companies should be answered before the final selection.

Sudan was assigned the task of following up with the companies, Yassin said.

It is not clear when a consulting firm will finally be selected, but the enquiries should be answered “within days”, he said.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
1



Aladdin, Alex
10-03-2015 12:43am
3-
0+
Dam Safety
It is of utmost priority., I hope the consulting firm firm will be asked to look for other alternative tech available to produce power without building the dam.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
King Aba Jifar
19-03-2015 02:19pm
0-
0+
@Aladdin
Hey hey my friend Aladin, i don't think so you know what you are writing, if there was an alternative for Ethiopia to produce power without building the dam no need of consulting firm in the first place, i think you are not following international media GERD (the dam) is already 50% finished, so there is no going back, even the government of Ethiopia can't do any thing ....GERD is the property of the people of Ethiopia.
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.