Last Update 23:27
Monday, 17 June 2019

Egypt govt to provide evidence of Saudi sovereignty in islands deal appeal: Cabinet

A Tuesday ruling stipulated that a 8 April border demarcation deal with Saudi Arabia is void

Ahram Online , Wednesday 22 Jun 2016
Tiran
A picture taken on January 14, 2014 through the window of an airplane shows the Red Sea's Tiran (foreground) and the Sanafir (background) islands in the Straits of Tiran between Egypt's Sinai Peninsula and Saudi Arabia (AFP)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1920
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1920

Egypt's cabinet said Wednesday that they would provide the documents necessary to prove that two Red Sea islands belong to Saudi Arabia, appealing a Tuesday court decision that deemed them Egyptian, state news agency MENA reported.

Tuesday's ruling by the country's Administrative Court stipulated that an April decision by the government to place the islands of Tiran and Sanafir under Saudi Arabian sovereignty was void. 

According to the MENA report, the government will present documents, maps and treaties to prove Saudi Arabia's longstanding sovereignty over the islands.

However, the government did not present these documents to the Administrative Court prior to the verdict. The lawyer representing the government was fined at least twice for failing to present these documents.

The government is yet to present these documents to the parliament, which is expected to discuss the deal and vote on it after the Supreme Administrative Court has made its final ruling.

The cabinet, in its Wednesday meeting, maintained that the court had no jurisdiction in ruling on the matter, but that documents would be presented during the appeal nonetheless.

The border demarcation deal, which was signed by Egypt and Saudi Arabia during a five-day visit by Saudi King Salman to Cairo, sparked widespread street protests during which dozens of demonstrators were arrested and later put on trial for illegally protesting.

All of those who stood trial were acquitted in court, but 47 defendants paid EGP 100,000 in fines.

The Saudi Shura Council approved the deal on 25 April and the Saudi cabinet followed suit on 2 May

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
3



hazleshades
23-06-2016 05:15am
0-
0+
Saudi gratitude for Egypt.
It is known that these two islands are under Saudi’s authority but Saudi asked Egypt temporary to protect them because they lacked sea forces, therefore, it is time to get them back with all Saudi gratitude to Egypt.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



Tut
23-06-2016 12:56am
0-
1+
The judge should watch his back
The country's Administrative Court judge reminds us with an honest corrupt auditor named Geneina; he dared to do his job and point out corruption at state institutions; he ended up smeared, fired, and now accused of ‘spreading false news’ AKA “saying the truth about state corruption”. This brave judge might be facing similar fate if not careful. Unless of course it’s all a diversion tactic by the government to give the public the impression that a ‘court’ looked into it and all will end up in Saudi’s lap eventually!
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



neil
22-06-2016 10:42pm
0-
7+
rule of law
the purpose of appeals court, is to hear appeals.the appeals court judges examine the case, and determine if there is any reason for an appeal. for example, they could agree that a technicality was breached; in this case, if the traitors, - I mean the 'government' lawyer, had won the case, the patriots - I mean the plaintifs, could successfully appeal, because of the government lawyers' breach of court procedure. One thing that is almost always not permitted, is the admission of new evidence. I will also add, that the government often attacks anyone who questions the competence or impartiality of the judges, yet is now guilty of contempt of court, [in addition to treason]].,
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.