Last Update 21:11
Friday, 20 September 2019

Eight reasons not to join SCAF advisory council

Ahmed Bahaa El-Din Shaaban says SCAF advisory council will merely prolong military rule, slams SCAF for being counter-revolutionary and killing protesters

Ahram Online, Friday 9 Dec 2011
Ahmed Bahaa El-Din Shabaan
Ahmed Bahaa El-Din Shabaan (Photo: Ahram archive)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2829
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2829

Ahmed Bahaa El-Din Shaaban of the National Association for Change (NAC) and the Egyptian Socialist Party has rejected an offer from the ruling military junta (SCAF) to join a proposed advisory council tasked with advising the junta during Egypt’s transition period. The advisory council is also expected to have a role in selecting members of the provisional assembly that will draft a new constitution.  

Shabaan used his Facebook page to detail eight reasons why he refused the offer:

1.        SCAF witnessed and benefited from the Mubarak regime’s corruption without expressing discontent.   

2.       SCAF is counter-revolutionary. It protects the country’s corrupt social and economic structure and has taken few serious measures against former regime members; while any measures it has taken were only after street protests that led to many deaths and injuries.

3.       SCAF has attempted to taint the revolution’s image and participated in creating the pro-SCAF rally in Abbassiya (a district of Cairo) to counter November’s Tahrir protests.

4.       SCAF connived with Islamist movements to push through March's dubious constitutional referendum and create a ‘farcical parliament’ which only aims to end the revolution.

5.       SCAF was responsible for the Mohamed Mahmoud Street massacre that left scores of martyrs and spilt the blood of thousands of youth, many of whom were deliberately shot in the eyes by police. SCAF has protected the interior ministry’s murderers by standing against their trials.

6.       The proposed advisory council will have no authority. It’s role will be to legitimise SCAF, and the people and the revolution will condemn it.  SCAF has frequently met and consulted with politicians and thinkers but then does only what suits its interests.

7.       Any cooperation with SCAF would merely extend military rule and be at the expense of those who fought, died or were injured for the revolution.

8.       All those who join the advisory council in the mistaken belief they are serving the nation should withdraw to protect their reputation and maintain the nation’s faith in them.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
2



hesham agag
13-12-2011 09:04am
0-
0+
not only
scaf has done many great services to protect mobarak and his cronies especially those who belong to interior ministry. scaf is not serious about bringing back our stolen money abroad, not only this , but created many problems to make people hate the revolution such as leaving the thugs loose in the street; Who should stand before military tribunals: the corrupted army generals or the bloggers?
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



Akram
09-12-2011 05:12pm
0-
0+
Leftists like Shaaban are detached from public
Point number 3 is outrageous! "SCAF connived with Islamist movements to push through March's dubious constitutional referendum and create a ‘farcical parliament’ which only aims to end the revolution." Connived with the Islamists? This is being dishonest to say the least. What Islamists? And what's the evidence? The EGYPTIAN PEOPLE approved the constitutional amendments and the committee that drafted these amendments was a mix of legal experts. Why do leftists like Shaaban like to see the world through their islamophobic prism? Don't you see that you're so detached from the Egyptians and so consumed by your personal vendettas against the Islamists to the point where you can't differentiate between moderates and extremists? And when are you planning to work and prove yourself a better alternative to the Islamsits you're so obsessed with attacking as a vocation?
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.