Last Update 17:51
Friday, 18 October 2019

BREAKING: Election articles fail to pass constitutional committee vote

Articles regulating and scheduling Egypt's parliamentary and presidential elections did not garner the 75 percent required approval rate by Egypt's constitutional amending committee

Ahram Online , Sunday 1 Dec 2013
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1860
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1860
Articles dealing with Egypt's coming parliamentary and presidential elections were the first articles to fail to pass a vote by Egypt's 50-member constitutional amending committee, currently holding their second and final voting session.
 
Article 229, which states that the next parliamentary elections are to be conducted through a mixed system of two thirds individual candidacy and one third party lists, was rejected after 18 members voted against it, 27 voted for it,  and three abstained.
 
The vote requires at least 75 percent approval for an article to be passed.   
 
Article 230, which outlines the timeline of the coming elections and states that parliamentary elections must be held after a minimum period of 30 days and a maximum of 90 days following the ratification of the constitution shared the same fate as Article 229. The article also stipulates that presidential elections must be held within a period of 30 days after parliament convenes. 
Search Keywords:
Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
1



J.M.Jordan
01-12-2013 06:39pm
0-
4+
Perhaps art. 230 would garner 75% if...
...it put the accent on for this time? Or was it rejected because the constitutional amending committee having seen ist own big difficulties was of the opinion also electors would need the time they needed, also more than what had been proposed to reach quality decisions? As to art. 229, what's wrong with the proposed mixed system? There actually is quite a bunch of democracies in the world which have such mixed systems without harm for them,
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.