Last Update 16:5
Friday, 22 March 2019

Egypt's Morsi, Tantawi commemorate 10 Ramadan victory anniversary

Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi praises role played by Egyptian Armed Forces in 1973 victory over Israel and army's role during and after last year's Tahrir Square uprising

MENA and Ahram Online, Monday 30 Jul 2012
Morsi and Tantawi
File photo: Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, left, shakes hands with Field Marshal Mohamed Hussein Tantawi in Cairo (Photo: AP)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2395
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2395

Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi on Sunday was received by Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi, head of Egypt's military council, at Cairo's Galaa Club, where the Egyptian Armed Forces held a banquet to celebrate the anniversary of Egypt's 10 Ramadan victory against Israel in 1973.

Several high-profile figures turned out for the event, including Armed Forces Chief of Staff Sami Anan and other high-ranking military figures.

On the same day, Morsi, speaking on his daily call-in radio show, reminisced about the 6 October victory – which fell on 10 Ramadan in the Islamic calendar – when the Egyptian Army successfully crossed the Suez Canal in the face of fierce resistance from its Israeli counterpart.

"I was a university student at the time; it was a great day for Egyptian youth," the 60-year-old Morsi recalled. "We were keen to liberate our land. The victory breathed life into all of us."

"Ever since, 10 Ramadan has represented unity between the Egyptian people and army, which has remained intact until now," the president added.

The relationship between the Egyptian Armed Forces and the public was substantially boosted during last year's Tahrir Square uprising. During the uprising, army troops were deployed in the streets to protect civilians following clashes between anti-Mubarak protesters and police personnel, which had resulted in hundreds of death and thousands of injuries.

The chant "The people and army are one hand" could be heard at most protests and gatherings in the months that followed. Later, however, many Egyptian revolutionaries turned against the Armed Forces to protest the policies of the then-ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), which assumed power upon former president Hosni Mubarak's ouster in February of last year.

The use of deadly force against protesters, the practice of hauling civilians before military courts, and a tendency to ignore outstanding revolutionary demands – including calls for social equality – were the main reasons why much of the public eventually turned against the military.

Until now, protesters have continued to chant against the SCAF, which ceded power to Morsi in late June but which continues to hold considerable authority, thanks largely to a controversial 'constitutional addendum' granting it certain powers at the expense of the presidency.

Morsi, for his part, has attempted to assuage the tension between public and army by voicing praise for the latter's role during the 2011 uprising.

"The Egyptian Army assumed responsibility on 11 February 2011 under difficult circumstances," he stated. "It was a move that was no less important than that it played during the October War."

"The Egyptian army also relinquished power to a civil authority [the presidency] after the people elected their own president on 30 June 2012, which represented the realisation of another dream," Morsi went on.

"The Egyptian people and army are one hand; there is no scope for discussing conflict [between them] or accusing individuals or institutions of betrayal," he added.

Some revolutionaries had accused the SCAF of "turning against" the uprising and sponsoring what has come to be known as the 'counter-revolution,' which many attribute to 'remnants' of the Mubarak regime.

The Muslim Brotherhood, from which Morsi hails, last protested against the SCAF over the issue of the constitutional addendum, the revocation of which the group had called for shortly after Morsi's inauguration. 

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
1



James Molay
30-07-2012 12:42am
11-
11+
Victory?
The Israelis crossed the Canal, outflanked the Egyptian army, and were marching on Cairo. You call that a victory? Egypt's neck was saved by Henry Kissinger who negotiated a ceasefire.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Kevin
30-07-2012 03:14pm
2-
2+
Revisionist History
Ahhh, brainwashing of the masses. Some of you may want to read the wkipedia entry for the Yom Kippur War. It clearly states the following, "Within a week, Israel recovered and launched a four-day counter-offensive, driving deep into Syria. To relieve this pressure, the Egyptians went back on the offensive, but were decisively defeated; the Israelis then counterattacked at the seam between two Egyptian armies, crossed the Suez Canal," There is also this little piece of history too, "the Israelis had improved their positions considerably and completed their encirclement of Egypt's Third Army." Had there not been escalting tensions between the USA and the USSR, Israel would have destroyed the Egyptian army. Here is another piece of real history, "At the conclusion of hostilities, Israeli forces were 40 kilometres (25 mi) from Damascus and 101 kilometres (63 mi) from Cairo." Now, I'm not pro-Isreal or pro-Egypt, but I am pro-History and the truth!
MS
30-07-2012 12:09pm
3-
3+
YES - Victory
In my opinion this is actually the kind of junk, that no-one cares about it. Fact is the Egyptian army crossed the canal first and won part of Sinai back after these long years of occupation. Victory or not, we live now and strive for a peace and prosperity, so KEEP QUIT with such provoking comments. .
A woman
30-07-2012 10:44am
3-
3+
Rewrite history books now!
Exactly, James!!! I think Egypt needs now also very urgently to rewrite it's history books as it needs as well a complete reformation of it's educational system. Dear Mr. President Morsi: This school system is so backwarded, universes behind most of other modern countries, it is a crime against generations of children. This should be one of your first aims, if really something shall change in Egypt. Otherwise: Forget it!
Mark
30-07-2012 02:41am
4-
5+
Egypt true victors
Egypt was in a clear dominant position with Israel on its knees until they cried to the USA who airlifted billions of dollars of millitary hardware and SR-71 surveillance unfortunately for Egypt the Russians did not offer anywhere near the same in assistance so check your history properly and respect what was an incredible tactical victory by Egypt over the first uninterrupted first week of the war
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.