Last Update 20:27
Friday, 19 July 2019

Opposition parties criticise draft parliamentary law

The Constitution Party, the Socialist Popular Alliance Party, the Karama Party, the Popular Current and the Freedom Egypt Party slam draft law as undemocratic

Ahram Online, Saturday 24 May 2014
parliamentary elections
Woman votes in the last parliamentary elections in Egypt (Photo:Reuters)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1747
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1747

A number of Egyptian political parties have criticised a draft parliamentary law released last week by the cabinet.

The Constitution Party, the Socialist Popular Alliance Party, the Karama Party, the Popular Current and the Freedom Egypt Party in a statement released Saturday criticised the new draft parliamentary law as "a disaster for democratic transition."

"[The draft] is radically opposed to the aim of the popular forces that came out on 25 January and 30 June for a democratic transition," said the statement, adding that the demand of the political parties and groups expressed in meetings and official memos was to have electoral lists.

Several liberal and leftist parties and activists had asked President Adly Mansour to ensure that the new law be based entirely on open party lists, which they argued would offer more representational justice than the polls in 2011-2012.

In the statement, the parties complain that the new draft law instead dictates that 80 percent of seats will instead be chosen through the individual candidacy system, in which a single candidate runs alone and not as part of a list.

This, according to the statement, is very costly, wastes the votes of those who did not select the winner, and reduces the role of political parties.

Supporters of the electoral list have frequently argued that list voting ensures that votes are accrued on the basis of a political platform rather than on individuals themselves, reducing the role of tribal and family links or on a candidate’s ability to persuade voters via favours.

The statement further slammed the draft law for making the electoral lists, by which the remaining 20 percent of seats will be chosen, an “absolute electoral list”. Under this system, voters will select one option from the different list groupings, and the list that obtains more than 50 percent of the vote will win all the list seats available in that constituency. The parties support a proportional list system in which list seats are allocated to list groupings based on the proportion of votes won.

The undersigned described the absolute electoral list as undemocratic.

The parties also criticised the new draft law for increasing the total number of parliament seats to 630 seats instead of 506 in the last elections, saying it would make it harder for MPs to discuss draft laws.

The last parliamentary two thirds of seats were allocated to electoral lists and one third to individual candidates.

 

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
2



Sam Enslow
24-05-2014 09:45pm
0-
1+
Recovery from the Black Death
There is an interesting book comparng the recovery from the Black Death of the 1400's in Egypt and England. It noted that Egypt was hindered because all political players focused their attention on Cairo. The only purpose of granted lands was to exploit them to make a big show in Cairo. The various political parties have had three years to gain support in various parlimentary districts. It seems fitting the local people will elect people they know and who they believe will best serve their interests. MPs and Governors also should be responsible to the people they represent - not some group in Cairo.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



neil
24-05-2014 09:10pm
0-
1+
some additional
as I explain in many articles and books, the only system less fair, less proportional, than feudal-era origin single-seat system, is the one referred to here as 'absolute', only used by 1700's origin US electoral college.... quite aside from respecting logic, facts and pre-agreed criteria, isn't the new regime supposed to be modernizing Egypt? As for the number of seats, the reason the 'cube root' rule (3x3x3 = 27) (Egypt = 435 seats) being near universal to every country's legislature, is because it best balances member representation of constituents, with a total number of members small enough that they can communicate with each other in a theater-sized room,.. not a stadium
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.