Last Update 11:1
Saturday, 21 September 2019

What does the Mubarak verdict mean for Egypt's political scene?

Dina Ezzat , Saturday 29 Nov 2014
.
Egyptian ousted president Hosni Mubarak (Photo: Reuters)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 4839
Share/Bookmark
Views: 4839

Hours after the government threatened to use live ammunition to deter Islamist demonstrations, a criminal court dropped charges against president Hosni Mubarak of killing demonstrators during the 25 January revolution.

The dropping of charges, which came after the recent acquittal of former Mubarak political figures including business tycoon Ahmed Ezz, was expected by many legal experts in view of the lack of prosecution evidence directly implicating the ousted president and his security aides, who was also charged in the case.

It does, however, prompt questions about a number of issues, at the heart of which is the role of police in managing politics and the possible rapprochement, or lack thereof, between the new regime, which is headed by Mubarak’s last head of military intelligence, and the former political network of the acquitted president.

Political scientist Gamal Abdel-Gawwad, who was close to the Mubarak regime towards the end of Mubarak’s presidency, is convinced that the implication of the acquittal is a mixture of rapprochement and divorce.

“I think it will make the police forces feel more comfortable and more confident about the lack of possible legal repercussions for executing commands to use force against demonstrators who aim to violate the protest law, whether we like it or not, or to undermine the state,” Abdel-Gawwad said.

“The sense of hesitation that marked the performance of the police since the end of the January 2011 Revolution and the arrest of all top figures of the ministry of interior should now come to an end.”

Whether or not the end of this assumed hesitation will bring about a more aggressive or simply more effective police, Abdel-Gawwad argued, is something that will be decided by the political will of the ruling regime.

The reading of this is widely contested by the revolutionary camp – small and isolated as it might be at present – and those who support the government of current President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi.

The former are clearly frustrated by the parallel between the acquittal of Mubarak and his top aides and the arrest of some key revolutionary figures. They are also pessimistic about what they fear will be increased repression.

Leftist political figure Wael Khalil is among those who share this view. While applying caution and arguing that “we need time to get a good read of how this verdict transpires on the ground,” Khalil is not at all uncertain about the message that this verdict sends when it comes to using force against demonstrators.

Abdel-Gawwad disagrees. The verdict, which he insists is not particularly influenced by the political will of the current regime, will not necessarily prompt the interior ministry leadership to go too far in using force “because when all is said and done it has been proven that excessive use of force does not serve the interests of a ruling regime.”

An equally central political debate prompted by Saturday’s verdict relates to the fate of prominent figures associated with Mubarak’s National Democratic Party.

For some, this verdict empowers attempts already put into motion by some NDP figures to reach out to their bases and to seek the majority of seats in the next parliament. Elections may take place either in the first quarter of 2015, as recently promised by state officials, or later.

Sources close to the NDP tycoon Ahmed Ezz had already been speaking of the extensive efforts that Ezz is undertaking to reassemble the NDP network, with an eye on some two-thirds of the next parliament’s seats. Some of those discussing this issue say that the current government supports his efforts, while others say they do not.

And while speculations have been high as to who is supporting Ezz’s political moves, the business tycoon himself had been on the record as saying that he has no intention of running as an MP.

Bassem Yassa, a political activist, is of the opinion that Saturday’s verdict should not be interpreted as an unconditional vote of confidence from the executive for the entire clique of the NDP.

The ruling regime, he argued, should not necessarily be seen as the power behind the verdict, which he said was in fact “expected all the way through due to legal reasons”.

“In any case one cannot force a link between the regime of [Abdel-Fattah] El-Sisi and the Mubarak clique.”

Yassa is also “fully convinced that no matter the support that El-Sisi has, there is no way that this support will be expanded to the NDP figures.”

According to Abdel-Gawwad, “those from the NDP who stood a chance in the next legislative elections are essentially the notables of the big families in the rural areas who always work with the government, regardless of who is in office, and those services rather than politics-oriented MPs who can always appeal to their constituencies.”

Abdel-Gawwad suggested that it is an open secret that those in office today never had much appreciation for Ezz or for that matter for Mubarak’s younger son, Gamal, or any of his associates.

“Those people have no political viability; they have no popularity and they are not liked by the regime so there is no way to imagine them having any role in the future; they got acquitted and they will go home to mind their business and if they don’t do so, I am inclined to think that they would be asked to very openly,”Abdel-Gawwad argued.

According to Abdel-Gawwad there is “a clear defining line between where the current regime stands on the revolutionary approach as a tool for inducing change and where it stands on the figures from the last few years of the Mubarak regime.”

A more complicated question raised by Saturday’s ruling is the fate of the groups that ushered in the 2011 revolution.

According to Khalil, “there might be a phase of depression before the political forces decide to rethink and reconceptualise their options and choices.”

Nadine Abdullah, a political researcher, believes there is one direct implication from the verdict, especially the failure to convict on charges related to the killing of demonstrators. She says there will be “more anger – it might be subdued, at least for now, but it will surely be increased,” arguing that it will definitely express itself but she is unclear about how and when.

Abdullah also argues that “even with this verdict” political Islamists are not likely to find back their way back into the larger pro-revolution camp.

She is also not sure whether the mass of workers, the only bloc that is still protesting in large groups for socio-economic rights, is willing to join the angry revolutionary youth for a next step.

“If the regime accommodates the socio-economic demands of the workers, it is unlikely that they will follow any future show of anger by the revolutionary forces, but if the regime fails to do so then it would be encouraging an association between the masses of labourers and the revolutionary youth.”

An official source meanwhile told Ahram Online that the acquittal of Mubarak and his top security aides is simply “closing a file of a page that had already been turned.”

“None of those acquitted today will have a public role; they will simply retire after not being found guilty by a court of law – for whatever legal reasons, and if no appeal is initiated by the prosecution,” he said.

As for the role of the police and the former members of the NDP, the same source commented: “we have laws to observe; the police will fulfill their duties in line with legal regulations, and the members of the NDP who are not found guilty of any charges and wish to run for the next parliamentary elections can offer themselves to the public, and it is the people who would decide”.

The official source declined to answer any question about the possible financial implication of the acquittal of Mubarak – which was an implicit wish of a number of Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia and the UAE, who have been key financial backers of Egypt since the ouster of Morsi.

“I reject the implication of this question; it suggests that the judiciary is not independent or that the presidency is going for a trade-off; I completely reject this,” he stated.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
3



Hasan Ayoub
01-12-2014 08:04pm
0-
0+
Egyptians don't deserve democracy
Itmeans nothing. Mubarak has won, the people have lost. You people have elected Sissi, who is now humiliating you.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



Allen
30-11-2014 08:49am
12-
198+
The verdict cleares more space in Egypt's prison system....
To incarcerate more dangerous Muslim brotherhood terrorists. An 80+ year old Mubarak sitting in a jail or sitting at home makes little difference. However, if he scammed the treasury he should pay up. He allowed the brotherhood to develop and grow while he was fast asleep on the job... THAT was his biggest crime.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



Larry McMahon
29-11-2014 10:58pm
264-
28+
Egypt's Shame
After the "Arab Spring", the dictator Mubarak was arrested. Morsi was subsequently elected as the legal president of Egypt. Maybe he was incompetent - but he was still the democratically elected president. Then, power was seized by yet another military dictator - Sisi. The Egyptian judiciary is obviously at the beck and call of whoever is in power. So Sisi proceeds to arrest anyone (including children) who disagree with his dictatorship, sentencing hundreds to death - and (miraculously) all charges are dropped against his crony, Mubarak! What a country! What a judiciary! What a joke - but a very sick joke indeed!
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Hanan
01-12-2014 08:09pm
12-
0+
Egyptians thrive on hypocrisy and mendacity
Egypt thrives on a culture based on lying since Abdul Nasser. Mursi tried to change that culture and was deposed by a bloody coup.
agnabi
30-11-2014 05:17pm
116-
6+
People chose that!
When young people tried to get "million" signature against Morsi, they decided to shake hands with the army. I don't believe the number of signature was millions, but at that time, if they really got that number, they could have done things by themselves. Instead, they chose to be close to Sisi. Anyone who has some intelligence knows what will happen next. And it happened. Demonstrations are prohibited. Media against the government are forced to be closed. Mubarak is acquitted. I am not surprised at all.
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.