Last Update 0:5
Wednesday, 16 October 2019

Attacks on Copts in Maspero weren’t religiously-motivated: prosecution

Prosecution jumps the gun before investigations are complete and suggests that the attack against Copts protesting in front of Egypt’s media headquarters was not religiously-motivated

Ahram Online, Monday 16 May 2011
Views: 3104
Views: 3104

After Cairo prosecution’s interrogation of 18 of the 52 suspects accused of attacking a Coptic protest that took place in front of Egypt’s media headquarters, Maspero, thus far concludes that the attacks were not religiously-motivated.

The prosecution claims that, rather, a normal fight erupted, starting with gunshots from the 6 of October Bridge near the protest. The prosecution left the motivation for the gunshots unanswered.

The 52 suspects were held on various charges of assault and battery, damage to public property, owning unlicensed weapons and intent to incite sectarian violence in Egypt. The attacks left 78 injured.

Today is the ninth day of the sit-in prompted by the attack on Copts and two ‎churches in ‎‎Imbaba on 7 May. The Coptic protesters refused to end their sit-in at Maspero Sunday, despite Pope Shenouda III petition for them to return home and end the sit-in.

Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

© 2010 Ahram Online.