Both El-Shorouk's editor Amr Khafaga and Hisham El-Miany, a reporter in the private daily are due to appear before the court of cassation on 18 December. They were cross-examined by prosecutors for ten hours on Saturday before being bailed out for LE20,000 ($3,500). The accused are facing allegations of libel, having published content deemed insulting to the judicial body.
The paper landed itself into trouble after it published an article on 4 December quoting National Democratic Party MP Mo'mena Kamel of the reigning NDP attacking Waleed El-Shafie, a judge supervising elections in the 6th of October constituency where she was running.
Following the 28 November elections, El-Shafie went public with statements saying that the polls were rigged in favour of Kamel and another NDP candidate, Nermeen Badrawy. He filed a complaint with the Higher Electoral Committee which is appointed by President Hosni Mubarak to oversee the elections.
El-Shafie and two other judges refused to monitor the second round of elections last Sunday citing police assaults.
The story escalated when Kamel was quoted, by El-Shorouk, severely criticising El-Shafie, who responded by filing a complaint with the general prosecutor accusing the paper and Kamel of libel.
Today's El-Shorouk devoted a significant portion of its front page to an apologetic column titled 'All respect and appreciation to judge El-Shafie' in an attempt, it appears, to persuade him to withdraw his complaint. The paper said a "misunderstanding" took place, as its editors never meant to offend El-Shafie or the judicial body in their coverage.
When contacted by Ahram Online, Khafaga said he would rather not comment on the case.