Last Update 21:38
Saturday, 19 October 2019

Thirty-five political groups officially boycott military dialogue

A signed statement lays out the groups' reasons for boycotting a series of meetings with the much criticised Supreme Council of the Armed Forces

Sherif Tarek , Wednesday 1 Jun 2011
The Egyptian military council
The Egyptian military council (Photo by Al-Ahram)
Views: 2491
Views: 2491

Thirty five political groups and parties have turned down the Supreme Council of the ‎‎Armed Forces’ invitation for a series of meetings that should start today. They have ‎signed a ‎statement to officially announce their rejection.‎
The April 6 Youth Movement, the Revolution Youth Coalition, the National Front of Justice ‎and Democracy, the Union of Maspero Youth, Tahrir Doctors (the Field Hospital) and the ‎Progressive Revolution Youth group are among the most prominent of the groups to boycott the dialogue.‎

Their statement read as follows:
‎“Dear members of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, your invitation to the ‎revolutionary movements for meetings and a direct dialogue, which came in [the ‎council’s] 60th and 61st statements, made us happy as it represents a turning point in the ‎relationship between the council and the revolutionary movements.

‎“We were missing the adoption of the revolution's demands, which resulted in forming ‎laws and policies that contradict with the revolution’s principles. Therefore, we appreciate ‎any attempt to fulfill the revolution's demands in accordance with the wish of the ‎protesters. And we have the following reservations about your invitation:

‎“1- We cannot accept the fact that the dialogue is conducted amid military trials for the ‎protesters, excesses committed by the military police and a lack of transparency in investigations ‎over these excesses – as what happened in the aftermath of the March 9 sit-in. ‎Also we object to participating in the dialogue with active laws that penalise strikes, ‎protests, peaceful sit-ins and freedom of speech, which were enacted by your council that ‎also criminalise talking about the military to the media.

‎“2- The invitation did not mention what the aspects or topics are, or the ground rules by ‎which the dialogue will be conducted, like what happened in the previous official dialogues which allowed ‎the remnants of the former regime to sneak in and that led to chaos, and we do not want ‎to be responsible for this. ‎

‎“3- The invitation was made in a hurry and there was no time – [only] 48 hours – for ‎feedback or for the groups’ members to discuss it.

‎“4- Asking for the attendance of any ten persons from any group that claim they are from ‎the revolution movements is a form of chaos and media publicity, which does not provide ‎the minimum terms for a national dialogue. The gathering of a thousand youths on a ‎stage without prior agreement makes the meeting pointless.

‎“5- We categorically refuse to separate the revolutionary movements from the rest of the ‎national forces as it weakens the revolutionary forces.

‎“The invitation of the revolutionary movements did not reflect seriousness, and so we ‎cannot accept this invitation … we call for a reconsideration of the interpretation of the ‎dialogue in order to come up with a program that is capable of making such an important ‎dialogue work.”   ‎

The No for Military Trials campaign and the Popular Committee to Defend the Revolution ‎also refused to take part in the dialogue but did not sign the petition.‎
‎  ‎
The dialogue seems to be an attempt by the ruling military council to clear the air after ‎facing a torrent of criticism and allegations of late. ‎

The introduction of several controversial legislations by the military council, as well as a lack of action against ‎toppled president Hosni Mubarak and other figures of the former regime – all detained on ‎multiple ‎charges of corruption – enraged the revolution youths.‎

On the other hand, other groups accepted the invitation for the dialogue, which kicks off ‎today, to be among the thousand participants. These include the National Association ‎for Change and its affiliates, ‎ the Free Revolutionaries Front, the Alliance of Egypt’s Revolutionaries and the Free Egypt ‎Revolution Coalition.‎

Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

© 2010 Ahram Online.