Last Update 9:31
Wednesday, 16 October 2019

'Writer Ahmed Naji's jail verdict unconstitutional,' say 7 authors of Egypt's constitution

The authors stress article 67 of the constitution stipulates that freedom of artistic and literary creation is guaranteed and that the state shall promote art and literature

Ahram Online , Wednesday 24 Feb 2016
Ahmed Naji
File Photo: Writer Ahmed Naji (Photo: Al-Ahram)
Views: 3243
Views: 3243

Seven members of the outgoing 50-member committee that composed Egypt’s 2014 constitution issued a statement on Monday condemning author Ahmed Naji’s jail sentence, describing it as "unconstitutional."

"Article 67 of the constitution stipulates that freedom of artistic and literary creation is guaranteed and the state shall promote art and literature, sponsor creators and protect their creations, and provide the necessary means of encouragement to achieve this end," the statement read.

On Saturday, a Cairo misdemeanour appeal court sentenced Naji to two years in prison for publishing a “sexually flagrant article” in the state-owned cultural journal Akhbar Al-Adab last year.

The court also fined Tareq El-Taher, the editor-in-chief of the journal , EGP 10,000.

The statement was signed by poet Sayed Hegab, artist Mohamed Abla, writers Mohamed Salmawi, Moasad Abu El-Fagr, Hoda El-Sada, Hagag Adol, and Former Head of the Social Democratic Party Mohamed Abu El-Ghar.

"No lawsuits may be initiated or filed to suspend or confiscate any artistic, literary, or intellectual work, or against their creators except through the public prosecution," the statement demanded.

“No punishments of custodial sanction may be imposed for crimes committed because of the public nature of the artistic, literary, or intellectual product," the statement added.

The verdict against Naji and Taher comes after the prosecution appealed a previous lower court decision cleared on 2 January the two defendants of all charges.

The two journalists were originally referred to court on the prosecution's charges last year and stood trial on 14 November 2015.

The prosecutor accused Naji of publishing a "flagrant erotic article in which the charged writer published a text that spewed sexual lust and transient pleasures, using his mind and pen to violate public decency and good morals, inciting promiscuity."

The seven authors of the constitution called on the prosecutor general to intervene to stop these "unconstitutional" verdicts. They also called on the parliament to review all the restrictive laws against freedom of expression.

The court decision provoked wide criticism among writers and artists.

On Tuesday, a group of 150 writers, intellectuals, and artists signed a statement condemning the ruling against Naji, saying it violates "general and private freedoms.”

Several human rights organisations have also expressed solidarity with the author, demanding the sentence be suspended. 

Meanwhile, Egypt's Journalists Syndicate announced on Tuesday it was organising a press conference on Thursday to show solidarity with Naji and journalists.

Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

25-02-2016 02:34pm
wrong procedure
What the author sis is not protected by the Constitution. Freedom of expression or of speech or of the press is not absolute, it does not include crying 'fire' in a crowded theater, instructions on hoe to commit a crime, treason or incitement, nor licentiousness. However, in the case of artistic expression, preventing works that violate public decency falls under the jurisdiction of the Censorship Authority, before the work is published. It is not the subject of the government after it has passed the censorship authority.
Comment's Title

Abdi haji Ahmed
25-02-2016 03:39am
Human rights at will
What about thousands in jail for being practical Muslims. . These are not for sake of liberty and human rightso. They represent the industry of vice.
Comment's Title

© 2010 Ahram Online.