Last Update 14:57
Wednesday, 16 October 2019

General strike calls face counter-propaganda before action begins

Military council, religious authorities and dominant political forces denounce calls for a general strike as tantamount to sabotage on eve of scheduled industrial action

Nada Hussein Rashwan, Saturday 11 Feb 2012
papers
Protesters following the news in Tahrir Square days before Mubarak stepped down last February. Despite the launched campaign against civil disobedience calls, it remains premature to judge its effectiveness and scope from day one. (Photo: Reuters)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1663
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1663

As the scheduled day for a general strike began, state media coverage contained strong denunciations, and allegations of a "conspiracy" behind the strike call.

On Friday night, the ruling military council released a statement on the eve of the scheduled strike and occasion of the first anniversary of Mubarak's stepping down from power. The statement condemned calls for a strike, describing them as aimed at undermining the country's institutions and "bringing down the state itself in order for chaos and ruin to prevail."

The statement could also be interpreted as a warning to those calling for strikes, stating: "We will not succumb to threats, we will not give in to pressure, will not accept any diktat."

Egypt's largest state newspaper, Al-Ahram, said in a heavily bolded title in its Saturday edition, "The people refuse disobedience." The paper opening its story saying, "All political forces have agreed on refusing calls for civil disobedience," without clarifying who the groups specifically are.

While the Muslim Brotherhood's political arm, the Freedom and Justice Party, the Salafist Al-Nour Party, along with Al-Wafd and other parties announced their rejection of the strike call, a number of political groups have publicly announced their endorsement of the strike initiated by several public and private student unions over the last week.

Independent newspaper Al-Masry Al-Youm noted statements made last week by Al-Azhar's Grand Imam and the Coptic Pope denouncing civil disobedience on the grounds that it contradicts with God's teachings.

Independent newspaper Al-Dostor allocated its main headlines to conspiracies Egypt is allegedly facing, such as the "millions of dollars entering Egypt for politically-directed civil society organisations." One headline read: "America aims at dividing Egypt and Israel looks forward to seizing Taba and Ras Mohamed in Sinai."

There was no mention of civil disobedience on the newspaper's front page.

Independent liberal newspaper Al-Shorouk described Friday's march on the Ministry of Defence as the "calm before the civil disobedience storm," highlighting that Salafist, Muslim Brotherhood and Wafd leaders have rejected strike calls on the grounds that they threaten the country's interests.

With an illustrated picture saying "No to Civil Disobedience," the Muslim Brotherhood's website spoke in its main story of "increasing public rejection of civil disobedience," published hours into the start of the day. According to the story, workers in sugar industry plants in Qena and Giza announced they will be working extra hours Saturday and donating their wages to the revolution's injured protesters.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.