Last Update 19:50
Egypt-Israel relations face uncertain future
Dramatic week that saw termination of Egypt-Israel gas export deal highlights mounting tension between two countries
Ahram Online, Tuesday 24 Apr 2012
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2294
Tantawi
Field marshal Mohamed Tantawi, and Israel defence minister Ehud Barak, at a 2007 meeting in the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh. (Photo: Reuters)

In a sudden twist of events over the last week, political relations between Israel and Egypt became increasing strained, climaxing in Egypt's decision Sunday to unilaterally cut the natural gas deal with the self-proclaimed Jewish state.

Despite both sides claiming this was just a business deal gone sour, against the backdrop of growing discontent and following the exchange of heated statements, it has become apparent that the actions of the neighbouring states are political.

Even though Egyptian officials had previously rejected calls to terminate the unpopular fuel deal arguing it was crucial for peace with Israel, on Sunday Egypt's General Petroleum Corporation [EGPC] and Natural Gas Holding Company [EGAS] ditched the deal with East Mediterranean Gas Company (EMG). Israel is a major shareholder in EMG.

Citing purely economic reasons, head of Egypt's Petroleum Authority Hany Dahy stated the decision was taken after several late Israeli payments. Following muchlegal consultation, Dahy explained that their findings showed that the contract stipulated that any one of the parties can terminate its obligations, if the other was not fully compliant with the terms.

The termination of the Israeli gas deal and the ensuing statements clarifying the decision, also directly contradict a long defended stance the Egyptian government has taken, in favour of the contract.

In 2010, the Supreme Administrative Court overruled a 2008 Administrative Court ruling in favour of cutting the gas deal, based on the argument that the court does not have the authority to infringe upon the government's sovereignty.

Thus contrary to Dahy's explanation that the move was purely economical, the decision to continue or cut the deal was previously considered by officials to be a political matter linked to national security.

Meanwhile, Shaul Mofaz, the Israeli Knesset opposition leader, described Egypt's decision as a possible breach of the 1979 Camp David Accords and Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman went as far as to suggest bolstering Israel's military presence along the Sinai border.

Such Israeli claims were however quickly brushed off by Egyptian political analysts.

Abdel-Alim Mohamed, former member of the Al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies, confirmed that the gas deal was not linked to the peace accord. He added that cutting the gas deal could not have been a purely economic act and clearly had politically motives.

The gas deal has not been the only tension between the two countries this week.

Only two days earlier, on 21 April, an Egyptian official claimed Israel was trying to harm tourism in Sinai. His statements came after Israel's anti-terrorism unit on Saturday urged its citizens holidaying in Egypt's Sinai Peninsula to leave immediately, citing fears of kidnap attempts and terrorism.

South Sinai Governor Khaled Fouda refuted Israel's claims accusing them of spreading rumors. Fouda said that Israel often did this whenever Egypt's tourism industry witnessed a revitalisation.

The increase in the occupancy rate of Sharm El-Sheikh hotels to 65 per cent, according to Fouda, was the main trigger behind Israel's "irresponsible statement."

Ignoring the rising tension between the two sides, last week on 18 April, Egypt's Grand Mufti Sheikh Ali Gomaa paid a rare visit to Jerusalem. His trip came despite decades of opposition by various political and religious bodies in Egypt to normalising relations with Israel and to travelling to areas under Israeli control.

His move was interpreted by many as an act of reassurance for the self-proclaimed Jewish state and a step towards normalisation, although he refuted such claims stressing he continued to refuse accepting relations between Muslims and the Israeli occupation.

 He instead highlighted the importance of supporting Jerusalem, adding he saw visits to Jerusalem's Al-Asqa mosque, the world's third most important Islamic site, as an essential part of "re-awakening" the Palestinian cause for Muslims.

It is yet unclear what the last week's developments mean for Egypt-Israeli relations in the long term.

Official statements have yet to be made from the Egyptian side, although Foreign Minister Mohamed Amr requested that Egypt's ambassador in Israel obtain official clarifications regarding Lieberman's recent statements threatening Sinai's borders.

 



Search Keywords:


Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 4000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
5



Izhak
26-04-2012 10:33am
3-
3+
Egypt Israel relations
You forgot the QIZ agreement that helps Egypt's economy and Egypt is seeking to renogitate so it will bring more revenues to Egypt .This agreement is a positive example of cooperation that boosts Egypt's Economy.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
4



Sami
25-04-2012 06:03am
7-
7+
Egyptian Jews cannot pray at the Rambam Maimonides Synagogue in Cairo. At least the Mufti can pray at Al Aqsa
Egyptian Jews cannot pray at the newly reconstructed Rambam Maimonides Synagogue in Cairo as it is closed due to silly excuses. Meanwhile the Mufti can pray in Jerusalem. To me this shows tolerance.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Hind
06-08-2012 05:41pm
1-
2+
Al Aqsa Mosque
Israel has benndigging under Al Aqsa since 40 years, it is slowly destroing it and has plans, to build on the Temple Mount.
3



Barak
24-04-2012 05:43pm
6-
7+
Take care of the words. Why spread hate?
I think a journalist/newspaper doesn't have to spread hate. Every time he defines Israel the self-proclaimed jewish state intends to generate a negative emotion into the readers. This isn't a good action in the interest of the peace and toward a state with which Egypt has diplomatic relations.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



Barak
24-04-2012 05:42pm
3-
4+
Take care of the words. Why spread hate?
I think a journalist/newspaper doesn't have to spread hate. Every time he defines Israel the self-proclaimed jewish state intends to generate a negative emotion into the readers. This isn't a good action in the interest of the peace and toward a state with which Egypt has diplomatic relations.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



Yossi Amitay
24-04-2012 02:56pm
8-
9+
Why 'self-proclaimed'?
I believe Israeli FM's statements regarding Israeli-Egyptian relations are totally unacceptable. I wonder, though, why does the above AOL news item define the state of Israel (twice) as 'self-proclaimed'. Does it mean casting a doubt on Israel's legitimacy? I am strongly opposed to Israel's occupation of Palestinian lands, and believe a just solution to the Palestinian problem is the key for regional peace and prosperity. However, Israel per se is definitely a legitimate state, a member of the international community, recognized as such by Egypt, and by no means a 'self-proclaimed state'. Using this particular expression in your news item is, alas, very unfortunate.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Mona
09-08-2012 02:41pm
0-
0+
Israel "self proclaimed state".
Watch available on Google: "The Most Complete Map of Palestine in 1948".
Ravi
24-07-2012 02:04pm
1-
2+
opposed to the occupation..????
If thats true, then what are you doing to end it?

© 2010 Ahram Online. Advertising