Last Update 23:39
Monday, 23 July 2018

Army ready to surrender power; no threat of Israeli military intervention: Intelligence analyst

SCAF and Tantawi don’t seek an official role after president elected, Israel isn’t planning a military intervention in Egypt, says security analyst

Ahram Online , Tuesday 22 May 2012
Sameh Seif El-Yazal
Views: 1765
Views: 1765

The Supreme Council of the Armed Forces is ready to hand over power to the new president, according to security analyst Sameh Seif El-Yazal.

Field Marshall Hussein Tantawi will voluntarily give up his powers and will not seek any political position after the election, added El-Yazal in an interview with Al-Sharq Al-Awsat newspaper Tuesday.

He went on to describe talk that the country would descend into chaos in the event of an Ahmed Shafiq victory as “purely humorous” and predicted the armed forces and police would ensure voting is carried out in a safe environment.

The SCAF did not endorse a specific candidate, El-Yazal said, and if it had wished to back a certain candidate, “it would have presented one of its own and made him wear a civilian suit.”

He said the Egyptian intelligence service had faced a “vicious campaign” against its legitimacy in recent months from within and without the country, and added that it should not be questioned over its conduct under the previous regime because it was acting within its jurisdiction.

Speculation over a possible Israeli military intervention in Egypt was misguided, he said, because it was not in Israel’s interest to fight Egypt at the present time, as the situation remained tense with its other neighbours.

El-Yazal expressed his support for Egypt’s decision to halt gas deals with Israel in April, yet was against bombing the pipelines "because a lot of the gas is being sent to Jordan and Lebanon as well.”

Since there is no official trade deal with Israel and no stipulation of the deal in the Camp David peace treaty, any intimidation by Israel should not be rejected. 


Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

22-05-2012 03:49pm
and then ?
What would they do ? some 6 million people verse 90 million egyptian ...Think a minute Militarily they can do it : to hi and weapons tech, highly trained troops and superior leadeship and combat management. But what for ? No way they can handle even a Sinai incursion facing angry mobs. Rest my case
Comment's Title

© 2010 Ahram Online.