Last Update 21:48
Monday, 16 July 2018

The Mubarak trial verdicts: Inside the courtroom

The mood inside the courtroom was electric during the moments before the judge read the verdicts aloud in Egypt's trial of the century

Saturday 2 Jun 2012
Hosni Mubarak
Egypt's ex-President Hosni Mubarak lays on a gurney inside a barred cage in the police academy courthouse in Cairo, Egypt, Saturday, June 2, 2012. (Photo: AP)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2807
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2807

Journalists and lawyers were let into the courtroom at 8am on Saturday. They waited two and a half hours for proceedings to begin.

Attendees passed the time by making predictions about the verdict and the upcoming presidential runoff. The courtroom was less than quarter full, with the smell of stale cigarettes, sweat and urine making it almost unbearable.
 
Security was much, much tighter than usual. Policemen flanked each row of seats, with some even standing in front of the judges.
 
Tension began when a Kuwaiti lawyer on the ousted president's defence team arrived and a number of those in attendance shouted, "Out! Out!"
 
As court clerks began filing out one by one, bringing in piles of documents and case files, the anticipation mounted.

And when the defendants appeared in the dock, and the judges began coming out, loud shouts could be heard emanating from those in attendance calling for the defendants' execution and justice for the martyrs.

Victims' lawyers began lifting photos of slain protesters in front of the cameras and judges. A few lawyers with long beards raised placards reading, "Execution is the people's verdict," and, "Execution is God's verdict."

Presiding Judge Mohammed Refaat began by demanding silence, threatening to walk out if there were any unsanctioned sounds or movements in the courtroom.

Only then did silence prevail. The judge began by giving a long speech praising the revolution and the "great people of Egypt" who revolted peacefully against tyranny and poverty and were helped by "God and the angels to clear the darkness."

He went on to describe Mubarak's three-decade rule as "thirty years of black; pitch-black hopelessness."

Refaat also spoke about judges' "tireless efforts" in this case, which featured 49 hearings, over 250 hours of court time, and 60,000 documents. He reiterated that judges in the case were unbiased, stressing that the truth was the only standard for their decisions.  

He then read out the verdict for the two chief defendants: life imprisonment for Mubarak and his long-time interior minister Habib El-Adly. "God is great!" shouted several lawyers present.

Objections began, however, when Refaat read aloud verdicts concerning El-Adly's top aides. Objections intensified as he read the court's rationale for the verdicts.

As the judges departed the courtroom soon afterward, lawyers began to shout, "The people want an independent judiciary!" and "Down with the regime!"

Some lawyers stormed out of the courtroom at that point, calling for a march on the Egyptian Lawyers Syndicate headquarters. Others called for mass demonstrations in Tahrir Square.

Judge Maha Youssef almost cried as she told Ahram Online that the ruling would be very easy for Mubarak and El-Adly to appeal.

"The judge provided defendants with a good cause to appeal in the verdict's rationale when he said there was 'no evidence' that they killed protesters, but that they could have prevented the murders," she said. "This would be a piece of cake for any lawyer to appeal."

This, say observers, could explain why the defendants' lawyers did not raise objections when the judge read out the verdict.

Soon afterwards, a fight erupted between policemen and a journalist who attempted to get a closer look at the defendants sitting in the dock.

Some lawyers loudly called on God to apply justice on "the tyrants who had corrupted Egypt."

As journalists and lawyers began filing out of the courtroom, many speculated that the verdict was political, and had to do with the upcoming presidential runoff vote.

"If the police officers were exonerated for not killing protesters, why were Mubarak and El-Adly found guilty?" asked one lawyer.

As journalists and lawyers left the building, they were warned to protect their heads, as clashes were reportedly erupting outside.

"The country will be on fire now," said one lawyer, stepping outside anxiously.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
2



Sagacity Brown
03-06-2012 11:31pm
0-
0+
Idiocy
What is disgraceful is for Egyptians to believe that Mubarak took $70 billion. That is complete idiocy. No evidence whatsoever, just hysterical fantasy. Which sums up the Egyptian mind these days, completely bananas, bereft of reason, childish, idiotic. What a mess this mentality is making out of Egypt and its future.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



Egyptian Magician
02-06-2012 05:28pm
10-
4+
A Disgrace
This is an absolute disgrace to all Egyptians. This verdict only proves that corruption still is happening in the government. How can they find him not guilty for corruption when people were saying he had $70 Billion? How can they find him not guilty of corruption when the British and Swiss find 100's of millions of dollars in their bank accounts? How can they find him not guilty of corruption when he takes Egypt's money and resources? These judges destroyed any chance that Egypt has to collect its money from the places that Mubarak hid our money. Without a corruption judgment, no country will turn over these assets to Egypt. The judges basically gave the money back to Mubarak. Right now I am absolutely disgusted and ashamed of the judiciary. After the way the election turned out, and now this shameful verdict; I think it's time to go to Tahrir and take back everything. These people never governed Egypt, they were its oppressors and victimizers
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Taz
04-06-2012 10:30pm
0-
0+
Don't believe evry rumour and telltale.
As you mentioned "people were saying he had 70 billion" which for anyone with common sence and with little little assessment would know it is impossible given that the richest men in the world don't have 70 billion and nor the Saudi Royal family. It is extremely hard to amass this amount of wealth even from a county like Egypt. The court does not and should not judge from rumours. All that was proven that Mubarak family have abroad is a little house in London worth 5 million sterlings that was bought by Alaa 20 years ago. The rest of the alleged money is all under "ask Hussein salem he may know", otherwise there are no proofs. As for the elections, the people pressured and the Scaf commited on their promise. It was monitored by international agencies and was transparent as it can be. Billions were spent and millions went to the booth, now the losers , like the clown Abu Ismail before them, want to change the rule of the games. Sorry, things don't work that way. If the elections this ti
	WorldCup 2018- News, Live score, Groups, Teams, Matches and stats-Ahram Online
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.