Last Update 14:13
Egypt court overturns military’s right to arrest civilians, postpones 4 critical rulings
Supreme Administrative Court overturns right of military police to arrest civilians, delays rulings on People’s Assembly, constituent assembly, Shura Council and ‘constitutional addendum’
Ahram Online, Tuesday 26 Jun 2012
Share/Bookmark
Views: 3341
constituent assembly
File photo: A general view of the two chambers of parliament meeting to elect the 100 members of the constituent assembly in Cairo June 12, 2012. (Photo: Reuters)

Egypt's Supreme Administrative Court has declared null and void the right recently granted to military police to arrest civilians, said lawyer and former presidential candidate Khaled Ali.Ali, who filed the appeal against the law, confirmed to Ahram Online from the courtroom on Tuesday that the court had ruled in his favour.

Egypt’s justice ministry issued a decree on 13 June granting military personnel the right to arrest civilians, a right previously reserved for police officers.

Crimes to which the law could be applied included "crimes and misdemeanours harmful to the government," "possession/use of explosives," "resisting orders issued by those in power or assaulting them," "destruction of public property or historic monuments," "obstructing traffic," "strike-actions at institutions that serve the public interest or assaulting the right to work," and "intimidation and thuggery.”

Earlier on Tuesday, the Supreme Administrative Court delayed its rulings on four controversial cases: one on the dissolution of the lower house of parliament, delayed to 9 July (initially postponed to 7 July but head of State Council Ali Fekri rescheduled the session); the second on the constitutionality of the constituent assembly, delayed to 4 September (initially delayed to 1 September but judge Fekri also rescheduled the session) ; the third on the constitutionality of the Shura Council (the upper, consultative house of Egypt’s parliament), delayed to 10 July; and the fourth on the controversial addendum to last year’s Constitutional Declaration, delayed to 10 July.

Egypt’s High Constitutional Court (HCC) ruled on 14 June that Egypt's parliamentary election law – which regulated last year's legislative polls – was unconstitutional. Following the decision, Egypt's ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) ordered the dissolution of the People’s Assembly (the lower house of Egypt’s parliament), a move which is now being challenged in court. The court ruling also threw the legitimacy of Egypt's controversy-dogged constituent assembly, tasked with drafting a new constitution, into doubt.

What’s more, the SCAF last week issued an 'addendum' to last year's Constitutional Declaration (issued in the wake of last year's revolution) giving it the power to dissolve the constituent assembly tasked with drafting a new constitution if the assembly “encounters obstacles that prevent it from completing its work” (Article 60B) and draw up a new assembly in its place.

The Muslim Brotherhood, whose Freedom and Justice Party represents the largest party in parliament and whose candidate, Mohamed Morsi, won just-concluded presidential elections, has stated unofficially that it would not accept the ruling junta's constitutional addendum or the dissolution of parliament's lower house.

According to several leading Brotherhood members, Morsi will refuse to take the oath of office before the HCC – as is stipulated by the constitutional addendum – because to do so would amount to tacit recognition of the addendum and the HCC decision that led to the People's Assembly's dissolution.

Other Brotherhood members, however, have said they would accept the court verdicts.

Such contradictory statements suggest that negotiations remain ongoing between the Brotherhood and the military council over the future of Egypt's parliament.

Prominent reform campaigner Mohamed ElBaradei, for his part, has said he was mediating between the two parties with the aim of "avoiding escalation."





Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 4000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
3



Abdur Razzaque
26-06-2012 10:39pm
0-
1+
A great Verdict from the Egyptian Supreme Court!
It is an another great victory for the Egyptian people from their Supreme Court decision that finally blocked the authoritarian rule of the Egyptian Military against the civil rights. Thanks to the Supreme Court for their great verdict in favour of the heroic Egyptian people!
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



Billy Potter
26-06-2012 06:12pm
5-
0+
Helping where no one else would
Ther are situations in which the military is obligated to support situations that influence their governments stability and standards either negatively or positively. The government should show more support for these "imaginary situations" that they can't be involved in but happens to save the government system time and time again from failing where situations arise that have the unimaginable potential to alter the belief and idealologies of government fundamentals all over this world. This isn't the first time that a non-government influence has stepped up to protect or harm the governments oppinion of the "system" that countless numbers of civilians rely apon every day to live. These systems "aren't there for all of us to live off of and for a reason. The same reason that wars aren't started for and for the same reasons that peoples lives aern't ever in any jeopordy of loosing. These situations are meerly there to provide people with job security and to provide people with a place to
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



Modern_Humaniora
26-06-2012 04:01pm
2-
3+
A dead star
The Mubarak era is a dead star. The light is still going, but it will eventually vanish!
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment

© 2010 Ahram Online. Advertising