Last Update 21:52
Sunday, 25 August 2019

Egypt's High Court magistrates condemn justice minister's criticism of legal verdicts

Egypt's High Constitutional Court blasts minister's accusations that court's recent verdicts on disbanding the People's Assembly were 'politically motivated'

Ahram Online, Thursday 16 Aug 2012
Ahmed Mekki
Justice Minister Ahmed Mekki (Photo: Reuters)
Views: 1836
Views: 1836

The general assembly of Egypt's High Constitutional Court (HCC) released a statement on Wednesday criticising claims by Justice Minister Ahmed Mekki that the court’s recent verdicts had been "politically motivated."

The statement condemned what it described as the "coordinated media campaign" intended to taint the court's reputation, adding that Mekki’'s statements represented a violation of judicial independence and the principle of the separation of power.

The recently appointed justice minister on Wednesday made statements to Egyptian state daily Al-Ahram in which he voiced disapproval of the HCC's "interference in politics," in reference to a court verdict in mid-June deeming Egypt's democratically-elected People's Assembly (the lower house of parliament) unconstitutional.

Mekki further opined that the court – in light of the political situation at the time – should have postponed cases related to parliament, along with other politically-charged cases.

The HCC later described Mekki's comments as "unacceptable interference" in the court's work, insisting that all the court verdicts were based on constitutional legitimacy and refuting claims they were politically motivated.

The court also called Mekki’s statements "contradictory," since they called on the HCC to remain apolitical while also asserting that the court "should have considered the political situation" when issuing its verdict.

Within the last year, the HCC has ruled on several cases of considerable political import. For instance, the court ruled against the constitutionality of the People's Assembly (which led to the assembly's dissolution) and against the constitutionality of a proposed 'disenfranchisement law' that would have banned former regime officials from participating in politics.  

The court has yet to rule on the constitutionality of the Shura Council (parliament's upper, consultative house) and on the constitutionality of Egypt's Constituent Assembly, tasked with drafting a new constitution. 

Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

© 2010 Ahram Online.