Last Update 0:24
Muslim Brotherhood expected to win legality, lose popularity
The Muslim Brotherhood is finally prepared to enter the political arena as a legitimate actor, but they still need to deal with popular perceptions of their intentions and millions of new entrants to the political realm
Yasmine Fathi , Sunday 20 Feb 2011
Share/Bookmark
Views: 4816
 Muslim brotherhood

Three days after former president Hosni Mubarak stepped down from power, the Muslim Brotherhood announced plans to form a political party.

"When the popular demand for the freedom to form parties is realized, the group will establish a political party," said the statement, posted on the group's website on 14 February.

The announcement did not surprise anyone. The group, founded in 1928 by Hassan El Banna, has been trying to form a party for at least two decades but to no avail. A 2007 constitutional amendment banning the formation of political parties based on religion made this prospect even more distant.

But the revolution changed everything. Mubarak has stepped down, parliament has been dissolved and the constitution suspended. Most significant of all, in terms of the brotherhood’s ambitions, the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces has formed a committee to amend the constitution, paving the way for it to gain political legitimacy.

“We have wanted to form a political party for decades,” says Mohamed Morsi, a member of the brotherhood’s Guidance Bureau. “But the corruption and injustice that we lived in, the legislation aimed at stifling of political participation, and the fact that the Political Parties Committee was controlled by the NDP made our quest impossible.”

Throughout the 18 days of the Egyptian revolution, the threat of a brotherhood takeover was voiced repeatedly in the media. Rumours that most of the protesters in Tahrir Square were brotherhood members sparked accusations that the group was riding the wave and exploiting a revolution, triggered by the country’s youth, for their own ends. Western media debated the possibility of the brotherhood taking over and what this would mean to Egypt’s ties with the US and regional stability.

Throughout, the brotherhood sought to emphasise that they are not leading the protest, but rather taking part as Egyptians. The group’s official website, Ikhwanonline, released statement after statement congratulating the Egyptian people for their “intifada,” and supporting the demands of the protesters.

On 3 February, the brotherhood released a statement saying that the group “does not have an agenda and their only purpose is to serve the people, which we have been doing for the past eighty years.”

After Mubarak stepped down and the armed forces said they will lead the country until presidential elections are held, the brotherhood made clear that they have no intention of fielding a presidential candidate. Their efforts, they say, will be spent in creating a strong Islamic political party that will be competitive and effective in gaining popularity.

“I believe that we will have a strong party because it has gained momentum from the revolution,” says Essam El-Erian, a senior brotherhood leader. “It will be open for men and women and for Muslims as well as Christians.”

The group plan to use a preliminary draft for a civil party which they created in 2007 and presented to 40 intellectuals, journalists and analysts for feedback to form a program for their planned party. Although the draft included eight sections covering everything from economic reform to solutions to the various problems in the Egyptian society, it was two controversial points that attracted particular attention.

The first was the prohibition against women and Christians from running for president, which meant that at least 51 per cent of the Egyptian population would be ineligible to run, raising questions about how the group’s attitude towards equality of citizenship. The second was the idea of creating a “Supreme Ulama Council” – a body of religious figures who would review executive decisions to ensure they comply with Islamic law. The opinions and approval of the Muslim clerics in the council would be crucial on all matters relating to government, by consulting “proven Islamic texts.”

Despite this criticism, Morsi maintains that the brotherhood intends to base its planned political party on the 2007 draft. People were quick to judge the program, he contends, and refused to enter into an intelligent discussion on the various points it raised.

“These people just wanted to attack for the sake of attacking,” says Morsi. “They preferred a monologue to a dialogue.”

El-Erian points out that the group spent 2008 gaining feedback for the program and, now they are preparing to launch a party, the program might be given a “major overhaul”, which may include a revision of the two controversial points.

Rather than implementing wholesale changes, however, Morsi says the group will focus on “editing” the program to clarify its meaning. In this way, for instance, he hopes it will become apparent that the brotherhood is pushing for a civil state; Islam, Morsi explains, does not recognize the notion of a theocratic state.

“The theocratic state was created in the West in the middle ages when people started diverging from true Christianity,” explains Morsi. “On the other hand, Islam adheres to the notion of a civic state with Sharia as its framework.”

Regarding, the Ulama Council, Morsi again insists that their idea was misunderstood; they never said that the council’s authority would supersede that of the parliament.

“What our program suggests is that if the parliament has an issue of a religious nature that needs the opinion of a committee, they can consult the Ulama Council, but are not obliged to act on that advice,” he says. “The current parliament already has a religious affairs committee, so what we are suggesting is neither controversial nor new so why the backlash?”

The fact that their program stipulates that the president must be Muslim is nothing new either says Morsi, pointing out that seven western constitutions state that the leader must be of a specific faith.

“In Egypt, the president is also the commander of the armed forces, which means that religion may play a role, especially if they fight the Zionists for example,” says Morsi. “But a Christian can be a general or minister of defence, no problem.”

Then there is the big question – Israel. Since the revolution picked up and it became likely that the president will step down, the question of Israeli security in the case of a brotherhood takeover and whether or not they will commit to the Camp David agreement keeps being raised – to Morsi’s apparent chagrin.

“Yesterday we had a French journalist who kept asking me about Israel and I kept telling him: well how come you are not asking me about France? But to answer the question: no we do not recognize Israel, we only recognize Palestine as a land where Muslims, Christians and Jews can live equally.”

Nor does the brotherhood mince its words when it comes to Iran.

In an interview with Egyptian State TV, senior brotherhood official Saad el-Katateny said the group rejects Iran’s political profile because the reference in Egypt is the constitution, the Supreme Constitutional Court and the Legislative Council.

Israel aside, Morsi says that the brotherhood is now more focused on events in Egypt and the upcoming parliamentary elections, which they plan to contest. In 2005, they won 88 seats. Now, they say, if the elections are transparent, they may win more seats.

But Diaa Rashwan, an analyst at the Al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies and an expert on Islamist movements, says it is not yet clear how popular the brotherhood is anymore. In the old Egypt, it was the NDP versus the brotherhood, then considered the largest opposition group. In the new Egypt, however, the ball is up in the air.

Rashwan points out that the usual voter turnout of three million is just one million more than the number of protesters who demonstrated in Tahrir Square during the revolution.

“Now we have this huge number of people and nobody knows who they are and what are their political ideology is,” says Rashwan. “The brotherhood will do their best to reach out and spread their ideology among this new section of the population, but I doubt that they will be able to do it before the next elections and I also doubt that any of these masses are from the brotherhood.”

The brotherhood, adds Rashwan, are not as strong as people think.

“People always talk about pre-revolution and post revolution, but what about the middle period?” asks Rashwan. “If the brotherhood were so strong, how come they couldn’t trigger the revolution themselves? Because they are not strong enough to do so.”

Add to that, he says, the fact that many of the youth who initiated the January 25 revolution have lost faith in all the old political groups.

“They have not only lost trust in the former government and in the NDP, but in all the political groups of the past,” he explains. “That’s why they keep trying to come up with new political parties; they want something fresh, something new.”

But, says Morsi, everything takes time. As long as there is true democracy and transparent elections, he is sure the brotherhood has a chance to become a dominant player in the political arena.

“We are in no rush,’ says Morsi. “Yes we have great popularity, but we are still not experienced in the work of political parties and we need time to get ourselves together, earn experience and learn how to combine our political work with our da’wa (evangelism) message.”





Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 4000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
14



EFG
23-02-2011 02:03am
0-
0+
Muslim Brotherhood
The Muslim Brotherhood is a religious fundamentalist, extreme organization. You do not play political footsie with this type of organization. They have a violent terrorist history. They aim to take control of the country and by their own words enforce Sharia law, see their pamphlets and pronouncements. Where will that leave Christians and women? They are now planning to form several parties not one under different names. Entertain them at your own risk. When will the west ever learn. Obama cannot be relied upon but Europe and Christians in North America can speak up and can intervene. If they don't they will rue their mis guided 'liberalism' when it bites them in the back one day soon. BEWARE. Don't forget their most recent slogan" ISLAM IS THE SOLUTION". Is it?!!
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
13



Coptic
22-02-2011 02:51am
0-
0+
the Muslim Brotherhood
Yes, Merielle, the MB have every right to take part in a new Egyptian democracy, form a party, even run for President. That's what democracy means - the voters choose to support them or reject them. But they have no right to ban one sector of the community from enjoying the same rights. If enough Egyptians feel that an Islamist government is a good thing, then that is what they will elect. If enough Egyptians feel that a particular Copt or a woman is the best option for President, then that is who they should be allowed to elect. No one, including the MB or a Sharia Advisory Council, should have the power to stop that freedom.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
12



NOORZAIN
21-02-2011 07:04pm
0-
0+
MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD
PLEASE HAVE A LOOK AT THE SOUTH AFRICAN SYSTEM WHERE PEOPLE VOTE FOR PARTIES AND NOT INDIVIDUAL PARLIAMENTARIANS. THE MAJORITY PARTY CAN THEN ELECT A PRIME MINISTER. PLEASE LET THE PRESIDENT ONLY BE A FIGUREHEAD WITH NO POWERS - LIKE THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
11



Merielle
21-02-2011 01:59pm
1-
0+
the Muslim Brotherhood
90% of the Egyptian people are Muslim. They have a right to to elect a government that respects their religion. If Americans have a right to elect a fundamentalist Christian president, G. W. Bush, why can't the people of Egypt have a similar right to elect an Islamist government? Of course, this is conditional on repect for all other citizens, Muslim and Copt. Finally, I have detected a certain tendency on the part of this paper to be anti-Islamist. The Muslim brotherhood has an equal right to get involved in politics and to form a politial party. Period.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
10



Fritz
21-02-2011 11:57am
0-
0+
Is Egyptian Islam above party politics?
I allways regarded the Brothers as some sort of Arab Rotary Club, YMCA of the Arab youth, something behind everything, sort if AIPAC maybe. So I like the title of the article... Good luck!
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
9



Rachel Cohen
21-02-2011 11:54am
0-
1+
Jews
What about the Jews of Egypt? There are very few left. When will Egyptians admit their crime of throwing Egyptian Jews out of their country? Please include Jews in this discussion.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
8



Rabiyah
21-02-2011 10:10am
0-
0+
The voice of descent will not be muzzled
What a nonsense...Yes Egyptians understand frustration of old regime who has been kicked by Egyptian in internationally recognized free and fair elections. More than 13 million Egyptians who voted for Mury were bribed..??? come on, wake up...for last eight decades you have been playing the same music against MB but you cant deceive Egyptians anymore...You had better learn the lesson now...Do something worth and say something that make sense so Egyptians could give you a chance in next election..
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
7



Sammy, USA
21-02-2011 08:17am
0-
0+
MB
NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
6



Sherif
21-02-2011 08:08am
0-
0+
Muslim Brotherhood
The Brotherhood looks like they will lead Egypt down a wrong path, replacing the repression the old (Mubarak) regime with another form of repression. True democracy must guarantee equality for all and freedom of speech and religion. Repression of women and Copts, as suggested by the Brotherhood's statement that these groups cannot run for president, goes against basic human rights let alone democracy. The result would be a failed revolution. The blood of those who fought and died for freedom the past three weeks completely will have been in vain. Egypt must seize the moment and pursue real democracy and a return to a respect of all human life and dignity. Much is at stake!
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
5



Coptic
21-02-2011 06:58am
0-
0+
Christian Leaders
“In Egypt, the president is also the commander of the armed forces, which means that religion may play a role, especially if they fight the Zionists for example,” says Morsi. “But a Christian can be a general or minister of defence, no problem.” Does he mean to imply that a Christian would not be as patriotic an Egyptian as a Muslim? That's the entrenched bigotry showing through. And why only a Muslim council to review legislation? What about a council to comment on the suitability of legislation for the 15% of Egyptians who are Christian? These days offer great hope for genuine democracy, freedom and equality for all Egyptians, but not at the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood. I had been so impressed with the way they have conducted themselves through this revolution, but this article makes me worry again. Perhaps leopards never do change their spots after all...
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment

© 2010 Ahram Online. Advertising