Last Update 14:58
Tuesday, 15 October 2019

Egypt's opposition forces remain steadfast against constitution

While the result of the referendum on the constitution appears all but assured, opposition forces vow to fight on to bring down the constitution, even if it takes years

Sarah El-Rashidi, Thursday 20 Dec 2012
Baradei and Moussa
File photo: mer director of the U.N.'s nuclear agency and Nobel peace laureate, Mohamed El Baradei, left, and former Egyptian Foreign Minister and presidential candidate, Amr Moussa (Photo: AP)
Views: 3500
Views: 3500

The results of the first round of the referendum on the constitution illustrated well the deep political divide within post-revolutionary Egypt.

Over the last two years, clear polarisation has occurred between Egyptians in support of the Islamist current and those opposing it, with President Mohamed Morsi assuming power with a mere 51.7 per cent of the vote.  

Now, with around 44 per cent of Egyptians having rejected in the first round the national charter drafted by an Islamist-dominated Constituent Assembly, it is unclear how the opposition will react should the constitution be passed by a similar margin.

“No country in the world would accept a constitution pass with only 50 per cent of the population in agreement," exclaimed George Ishak, member of the National Salvation Front (NSF) and founding member of the Dostor (Constitution) Party, founded by leading opposition figure Mohamed ElBaradei.

"In France, when only 54 per cent of the population agreed on the constitution it remained in dispute until 85 per cent consented," he added.

Khaled Dawoud, NSF spokesperson, echoed similar sentiments, saying that, "Two thirds of the country needs to agree on the constitution before it can be considered passed.”

Apart from the low 'Yes' vote percentage in the first round, Islamists are under pressure on the events that led to violent protests at the Cairo presidential palace.

The force of the protests following President Morsi’s contentious 22 November decree and the results of the first round of the referendum for many demonstrate the decline in popularity of Islamist parties, which accrued more than 70 per cent votes in last year’s parliamentary elections.

The Egyptian judiciary’s reaction both towards the 22 November decree and the draft constitution, experts believe, is further indicative of the decline in popularity, and authority, of the Islamist project and government. A majority of judges refused to oversee the referendum in protest at the 22 November decree, while members of the higher council of the Egyptian State Council's Judges' Club said Monday they would not supervise the second round of the referendum due to violations committed in the first.

Markedly, the State Council was one of the few judicial authorities that had previously agreed to monitor the referendum.

In addition, with the second round scheduled for 22 December, opposition marches continue, called upon by prominent political opposition groups, including the Revolutionary Socialists, the Strong Egypt Party, the 6 April Youth Movement and the Socialist Popular Alliance to denounce what they term "the Brotherhood's constitution."

Nonetheless, experts on both sides of the political divide expect the referendum to pass.

“I am sure the Freedom and Justice Party will make the referendum pass no matter what!” asserted Bas El-Adel, president and founder of the liberal Nile Party, established five months ago.  

On the Islamist side, there is confidence. I think we will gain the majority of votes, around 60 per cent,” stated Yousri Hamas, El-Nour Party spokesman.

Attention, therefore, is turning to what happens after the referedum. with parliamentary elections due in just two months.

“We are living day-by-day; we have not reached the stage of thinking about what will happen if the referendum is passed. We will keep opposing the policies of the Muslim Brotherhood and the constitution. We refuse to give up!” said Dawoud. When pressed to disclose the opposition’s intentions regarding parliamentary elections, Dawoud said only that participation is assured.

“We will most certainly participate in the upcoming parliamentary elections! The opposition currents are now one, united under one umbrella,” declared Ishak.

Divided on dialogue

The need for national dialogue — ostensibly to reinstate a degree of consensus in the political domain, deemed necesssary for stability — is another dividing issue in current Egyptian politics.   

“We don’t think national dialogue is a serious process with Morsi, as he has only listened to his own people and has done what he wants with the declaration and the referendum,” stated Dawoud.

Many opposition members like Ishak boldly state that if Morsi doesn’t stop the referendum no negotiation will be possible. Zakaria believes that dialogue with "the real opposition" (by which she means figures independent from the former regime) will take place only when the referendum is passed. “We never refuse dialogue; it is always the opposition that refuses!” she declared.

Meanwhile, the president’s legitimacy continues to hang in the balance. Former President Hosni Mubarak was given a life sentence for failing to prevent the deaths of protesters in January-February 2011. Many opposition forces now call for the same charges to be brought against Morsi for his failure to prevent the deaths that ensued from violent confrontations at the presidential palace in Heliopolis.

“Morsi’s presidency is illegitimate; he has made many promises and broke them!” asserted Ishak, detailing Morsi’s meeting with members of the NSF prior to the 22 November decree, during which opposition currents urged him to reach for consensus, which he ignored.

Other members of the opposition, like Dawoud, maintain the opposition is not questioning Morsi's legitimacy as president, but rather the constitution and the process involved in its drafting.

A Brotherhood state

The principal qualms raised by the opposition concerning the draft constitution involve sweeping presidential versus parliamentary powers, the relation between the president and the judiciary, the role of Sharia vis-a-vis minority rights and social freedoms.

Opposition groups underline that the current draft was largely written by the Muslim Brotherhood for the Brotherhood and is not representative of all Egyptians. When questioned about such issues, Islamist forces maintain that the new constitution by far outshines the 1971 Constitution, in operation under Mubarak.

Hamad emphasised parliament’s ability to dismiss the president with a two-thirds majority as illustrative of the greater focus on popular power in the present constitution compared to its precedessor. Dina Zakaria, media spokesperson for the ruling Freedom and Justice Party (FJP), assures that presidential powers are appropriately balanced in the new constitution, discounting as rumour the widely expressed fear of dictatorship held by opposition camps.

Minority rights, according to Hamad, are well protected in the new constitution, though he admits that, “certain religious minorities which are not recognised in the Quran — those that do not belong to the Muslim, Christian or Jewish faith, such as the Bahai — do not have rights in the constitution,” adding that the presence of such minorities are not welcome in Egypt.  

Constitution infowar

Islamist camps accuse the opposition of spreading false propaganda about the constitution, including printing fake versions of the constitution, adding or denying the existence of certain articles, and also incorrectly explaining many articles.

“We have advised people to read the constitution; once they realise it is not horrible like the media and opposition claim then most will vote 'Yes',” maintains Zakaria.

But opposition forces charge Islamists with similar deceit, involving vote buying, false propaganda, incorrect information about the constitution and false promises.

The FJP spokesperson also criticised the opposition for questioning the constitutional drafting process, emphasising that the re-writing of the 1971 Constitution was one of the revolution’s demands. Attacking the Constituent Assembly is uncalled for, according to Zakaria, since its members were selected in a fair process. Zakaria claims that despite the resignation of Copts, seculars and independents from the drafting committee, their inputs were incorporated in the new constitution.

“None of the inputs of former members of the Constituent Assembly were deleted!” Zakaria insists.

With the second phase of the referendum set to take place in 17 governorates 22 December, including Giza, which has the second biggest number of voters after Cairo, Egyptians apprehensively await the ultimate result.

Opposition parties remain steadfast that whatever happens, the fight to bring down the constitution will continue.

“In 1913, we had a similar constitution that took five years to bring down. We will fight until the same occurs today!” said El-Adel defiantly.

Such attitudes are fiercely criticised by Islamists who say that the choice of the people cannot be overlooked. So far, this response is not deterring opposition calls to hit the streets, especially if the referendum is passed.

Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

20-12-2012 07:55pm
Constitution is not the real issue
I think the constitution is not the real issue. The real issue is that the so-called opposition rejects democracy if democracy brings to power non-secular parties.
Comment's Title

20-12-2012 07:33pm
Egypt's opposition forces remain steadfast against the country's peace
These guys are very old and are senile. Cannot think straight at this age. They should retore now from politics. They are failures Moussa was spineless figure of Arab League, Elbradei was IAEA chief not accomplished any goal. Where is 3rd stooge Sabbahi in this picture he might have retired and came in his senses. Why AO playing with words by saying "Egypt's opposition forces remain steadfast against constitution" what a headline?
Comment's Title

20-12-2012 06:48pm
Constitution is Dynamic
Constitution is dynamic. It can be changed when you have the majority in the parliament. Organise your self for the next election. When you have two third majority you can passed the amendment.Why you are coward. I am sorry to say the three stoogies does not believe in democracy and and has no creditability to talk about democracy.
Comment's Title

20-12-2012 05:35pm
steadfast to down egypt
the only results I can see, by refusing dialog, is taking egypt down. Egypt will never have a shortage of foreign agents. Let us play democracy through the real people, and not these old farts.
Comment's Title

Najah Salam
20-12-2012 03:11pm
only by democratic means
The opposition has the right to foil the constitution only by democratic means, not by torching buildings and murdering people.
Comment's Title

20-12-2012 03:02pm
Opposition hungry for power....
These self-centered opposition leaders are hungry for power at ALL cost, even at the cost of bringing instability to Egypt. They are not democratic as they do not care for the voice of the majority who have voted for the constitution... Even if the NSF comes to power by hook or by crook their leaders will oppose each other as each one will want all the power for himself, in the process destroying Egypt.
Comment's Title

Samy El Safty
20-12-2012 12:43pm
So why..
Islamists donn't give up and at least make concessions and compromise if they pretend to worry about the country's future
Comment's Title

20-12-2012 12:12pm
Positive approach or negative approach
Few says glass of water is half empty, while the other approach is that glass of water is half filled. You can't compare the parliamentary elections to referendum as there are lot of parties as compared to 2 parties. In this case Islamist and non Islamist. Referendum can be compared with second round of presidential elections because of 2 parties with similar polarization. Percentage is increased from 51.7% to 56.5% that is 4.8% increase in popularity of one group or rejection of other group. The gap has also increased by 9.6%. Now the difference between Yes and No is 13%. If there is any clause in constitution 2011 of two third majority than you are right otherwise opposition is unfair. In absence of clause of absolute majority simple majority is enough as per law of constitution. Demanding something other than the law of constitution would be considered as totally unfair. To be noted that constitution 2011 has also been passed by referendum majority. In Democracy as given to us by we
Comment's Title
21-12-2012 04:00am
This is Correct!
We are not opperating by French laws or policies. This was the law passed by the people in 2011.

© 2010 Ahram Online.