Last Update 20:52
Sunday, 25 August 2019

Leading FJP figure calls for 'purge' of Egypt's 'Mubarak-era' judiciary

Speaking in Doha, leading member of Islamist Freedom and Justice Party (FJP), says Egypt's judiciary played 'integral' role in sustaining Mubarak's police state, calls for 'purge' of Mubarak-era judges

Ahmed Eleiba, Tuesday 21 May 2013
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1412
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1412

Egypt's currently judiciary was an integral part of the former Mubarak regime, aiding in the passage of authoritarian legislation, Waleed El-Hadad, leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party (FJP), said on Tuesday.

"A large percentage of the judiciary must be purged," El-Hadad, head of the FJP's foreign affairs department, declared at the Doha Forum in Qatar.

He went on to criticise last year's dissolution of Egypt's People's Assembly (the lower house of parliament, currently known as the House of Representatives), a move that he blamed on Egypt's Mubarak-era judiciary.

"How can the People's Assembly, which was freely elected by 35 million citizens, be dissolved by a judicial body consisting of only 19 individuals," El-Hadad said.

The People's Assembly was dissolved last summer by order of Egypt's then-ruling Supreme Military Council after the High Constitutional Court (HCC) ruled the law regulating parliamentary polls unconstitutional.

Egypt's Shura Council, the upper house of parliament, currently holds legislative authority pending the election of a new House of Representatives. The Shura Council is now at loggerheads with the judiciary.

The dispute began earlier this year when Shura Council MPs representing the moderate-Islamist Wasat Party – a breakaway party from the Muslim Brotherhood – introduced draft legislation that has been fiercely opposed by many Egyptian judges.

The bill reduces the retirement age for judges from 70 to 60, which would see about one quarter of Egypt's 13,000 serving judges pensioned off.

Opponents describe the law as a 'massacre' of the judiciary to the benefit of the Muslim Brotherhood, which they accuse of wanting to appoint pro-Brotherhood judges. The law's proponents, meanwhile, argue the move is necessary to 'purge' Egypt's judiciary of Mubarak-appointed judicial officials.

The deadlock appeared to have been broken after agreement was reached between the administration of President Mohamed Morsi – which supports the bill – and judicial representatives to hold a conference to discuss judicial reform, before moving ahead with any legislative changes.

Following a few days of calm after the agreement, however, the saga again took a turn for the worse when the Shura Council announced last week that it would discuss the disputed law on 25 May.

Egypt's Judges Club had earlier set conditions for taking part in the conference, chief among which was that the Shura Council not be allowed to pass legislation relating to Egypt's judiciary.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
2



Andrew Arato
21-05-2013 08:32pm
6-
3+
astonishing
It is astonishing that authoritarians everywhere attack the courts in the same way. From Mrs Gandhi in India to Viktor Orban in Hungary the story is always the same: court packing, jurisdiction removal, forcible retirement. We should be clear that it is always our freedom that is at stake in these ventures. Yes some judges and some courts supported authoritarian repression in Egypt, under Mubarak. Other judges and courts supported human rights, civil society organizations and even tried to improve elections and election laws. their recent intervention in Egypt was also nt on behalf of the old regime, but a more consensual and participatory model of constitution making.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



Al-Misry
21-05-2013 08:05pm
3-
6+
That is Right Hung Them
Unless Egptians confront these corrupt judges with an Iron-Fists. We are unlikely to reach no where. these felools need up-rooted from all levels of the system. Signs of where they are is when a MB Boss is oppointed over them they go out and protest before they die away.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.