Last Update 21:19
Saturday, 29 April 2017

Cairo knew of planned Blue Nile diversion in advance: Govt source

Egyptian government source says Cairo was notified beforehand about Ethiopian plan to redirect course of Blue Nile, referring to unsuccessful attempts to convince Ethiopian side to delay the move

Dina Ezzat , Tuesday 28 May 2013
Morsi
Egypt's President Mohamed Mursi (C) arrives at Bole International airport for the 21st Ordinary Session of the African Union (AU) in Addis Ababa May 24, 2013 (Photo: Reuters)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2431
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2431

Cairo was notified in advance about the diversion of the Blue Nile before the move was officially announced by Ethiopia late Monday evening, an informed government official told Ahram Online.

"We had already known this; we were notified and the president knew," he said.

Ethiopia on Tuesday began diverting the course of the Blue Nile, one of the Nile River’s two major tributaries, as part of a project to build a new dam.

The move, called "historic" by Ethiopian government spokesman Bereket Simon, is likely to anger downstream Egypt and Sudan, both of which fear the move will negatively affect their annual quotas on Nile water.

Ethiopia's 'Renaissance Dam' is one of four dams planned for construction along the Blue Nile, which provides Egypt with the lion's share of its annual 55 billion cubic metres of Nile water.

On Monday, Ethiopian Foreign Minister Gebre-Christos said the dam, which is currently under construction and will be able to store some 84 million cubic metres of Nile water, would be used exclusively for power generation and would not reduce Egypt's share of Nile water.

The Egyptian government source said that, during President Mohamed Morsi's visit to Addis Ababa – which ended Monday evening only hours before the announcement – there had been unsuccessful attempts to convince the Ethiopian side to delay the move.

"There were attempts [to persuade Ethiopia to postpone the move] through several diplomatic channels, both direct and indirect, and during the president's talks with senior Ethiopian officials," the source said.

"President Morsi raised the matter, but it was clear Ethiopia is determined to go ahead."

The source added that Addis Ababa was offering "reassurances" that it would be "sensitive" to Egyptian concerns and would "try to accommodate" Cairo's demand that it fill the planned dam's reservoir only gradually, so as to ensure that the effect on Egypt's annual share of Nile water would not be too abrupt.

The Ethiopian move to redirect the course of the Blue Nile is perceived by Cairo as an indication of Addis Ababa's determination to follow through with its plans, despite Egypt’s objections that such plans violate international agreements that put Egypt’s annual share of Nile water at 55 billion cubic metres.

Addis Ababa has repeatedly shrugged off these agreements, asserting that they deny all Nile Basin states – apart from Egypt and Sudan – any serious share of river water.

Since 1902, there have been over ten agreements regulating the distribution of Nile water, including a 1959 agreement that specified Egypt's exact share.

Most of these agreements stipulate that no dams or other irrigation projects should be built on the Nile without the prior notification of all Nile Basin states.

It is a precondition consistent with international law and with regulations adopted by the basin states of other rivers.

In 1999, Egypt agreed to join the other Nile Basin countries in a negotiation process specifically aimed at addressing the demands of the upstream countries.

During the process, Egypt issued two recommendations: firstly, to reduce water wastage, currently estimated at millions of cubic metres (some studies indicate that total wastage is more than Egypt's entire annual share); and, secondly, to streamline usage of upstream water resources, including rainwater.

In 2010, both Egypt and Sudan (before the latter was split in two) suspended their participation in the talks due to a failure to define the terms of an agreement governing the construction of irrigation projects on the Nile.

The fate of this process remains in limbo, however, with both Cairo and Khartoum insisting on the full consensus of all basin countries before any dams can be built on the river.

The dispute over Nile water began in 2009 with demands made by upstream states, including Ethiopia, to reduce Egypt's share in line with a new water-sharing treaty already signed by most upstream states.

Egypt is already suffering a water shortage and there are genuine concerns that Ethiopia's planned Renaissance Dam would aggravate an existing problem that has until now been poorly attended to.

According to Egypt's National Planning Institute, the country will likely need an additional 21 billion cubic metres of water per year by 2050 – on top of its current 55-billion-metre quota – to meet the water needs of a projected population of 150 million.

A source from the UN Development Programme suggested that Egypt's annual loss of water – due to outdated irrigation systems and poor sewage maintenance – currently stood at some 10 percent of its official annual share.

"The fact that Egyptian authorities have turned a blind eye to the loss of fertile land is an added problem, as this means that Egypt would need much more water to help with desert land reclamation," the source said.

Egypt's concerns go beyond its share of Nile water.

A source close to the three-way consultation mechanism bringing together Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia to discuss "technical aspects and influences" of Ethiopia's planned Renaissance Dam speaks of "safety concerns" as well.

"I'm not saying the Renaissance Dam will collapse shortly after its construction, but I'm saying there are concerns that – in a few years – it could develop cracks," he said.

The three-way consultation, which has been ongoing for over a year, began its sixth session in Addis Ababa two days ago.

It should issue a comprehensive report on the issue by the end of this month or early next month.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
5



Edo
01-06-2013 11:36am
0-
0+
International agreement?
"...such plans violate international agreements that put Egypt’s annual share of Nile water at 55 billion cubic metres ..." Which international agreement gave that share to Egypt? Why do you lie? o you really call it an international agreement?
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
4



Alemgena
30-05-2013 04:41pm
0-
0+
Why the crack?
this time Egypts tune has changed to the crack on the Grand Renaissance Dam that will occur some years in the future. How does the Aswan Dam survived until today? So, why don't you think rationally? or because it is being built on the upper stream that will crack? Please, be reasonable while you utter your messages. Ethiopia has its own share on the blue Nile, as Egypt has. Therefore don't be panic as far as Ethiopia assures to keep the well being of Egyptians and Ethiopian people as well.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
3



Abiyot
30-05-2013 09:40am
0-
1+
Mutual Benefit
Ethiopian,Egypt,Sudan have along historical relation ...nature created a strong Bond among us , .... Egypt may not has any rain droplet , Ethiopia has not any oil droplet, we Ethiopian saying let grow up together; mutual benefit on Nile river, Nile or Abay is going to be Energy source for us. We are saying "we are constructing the dam for Hydro power, we will use only for Electric power with out Affecting both Egypt and Sudan"
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



Farid
29-05-2013 10:12am
0-
2+
Planned in Advance
Negotiations about river Nile took place same time as Egyptian Revolution start and right after Sudan was divided. Using turmoil in Egypt to as cover. "May 15, 1902 – Article III of the Treaty between Great Britain and Ethiopia. Article three states “His Majesty the Emperor Menilik II, King of Kings of Ethiopia, engages himself towards the Government of His Britannic Majesty not to construct or allow to be constructed any work across the Blue Nile, Lake Tana, or the Sobat, which would arrest the flow of their waters except in agreement with His Britannic Majesty’s Government and the Government of Sudan". According to OLD agreement from 1929 between 10 countries over river Nile, Egypt has right to agree or disagree on any construction over the river. When Sudan divided, 11th country had to be put in agreement and same time agreement has been changed taking many privileges from Egypt. This is just general insight on subject...
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
anti
29-05-2013 06:10pm
0-
0+
why not now?
Only win-win solution!!!!
1



Ali
29-05-2013 06:42am
1-
1+
Wasted water
Public authorities are responsible for the waste a staggering amount of water. Roads are continuously seen to be flooded with water, more especially in new settlements and affluent areas like New Cairo and Maadi. Why? Because untrained and unsupervised council workers are left to their own judgement of how public gardens should be irrigated. Leaving the tap turned on for 24 hours or longer is a common fault. The garden is overwatered within a couple of hours, much less the actual 24 hours the tap is left open. This loss runs into thousands of litres in each location . Multiply by the number locations where this occurs and the result is shocking. This is fixable people! Not a national solution but a contribution nevertheless
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment

Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.