Last Update 14:58
Tuesday, 19 November 2019

Salafist politician wants referendum on police, military right to vote

Watan Party chairman Yosri Hammad wants referendum to confirm court ruling that Egyptian police and military can vote

Ahram Online, Tuesday 28 May 2013
Hammad
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1137
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1137

Yosri Hammad, chairman of the Salafist Watan Party, has said that a court decision granting members of the army and the police the right to vote should be put to referendum by Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi.

Following the decision of the High Constitutional Court (HCC) on Sunday, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Hatem Bagato said that the Shura Council would not challenge the court’s decision.

“The involving of the military institute in politics after their withdrawal is a dangerous issue,” said Hammad, adding that the court’s decision was a “surprise” given that officers have been barred from voting since 1976.

Egypt's Islamist parties view the High Constitutional Court with extreme suspicion.

Last December, the court was besieged by Islamist protesters who prevented the court from issuing a ruling on the constitutionality of Egypt's outgoing Islamist-dominated Constituent Assembly, tasked with drawing up a new constitution.

In the summer of last year, the court was severely criticised by Islamist groups after it called for the dissolution of Egypt's first post-revolution lower house of parliament, in which Islamist parties had won roughly three quarters of the seats.

The court's recommendation was quickly carried out by Egypt's then-ruling supreme military council.

While Bagato sees the HCC's latest assertion as binding – and in line with citizens' constitutional right to vote – he also voiced the opinion that the military establishment and police apparatus should both be kept at a distance from domestic politics.

According to Egypt's new constitution, all laws drafted by parliament must be subject to review by the High Constitutional Court. If the court finds the proposed legislation unconstitutional, it must be amended.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
1



Sam Enslow
29-05-2013 11:57am
0-
1+
Rights are not subject to vote
There is a reason rights are granted in the constitution. They are rights - not subjects of popular vote or current passions. The Islamists are the ones who just had to rush the constitution over the objections of most everyone else. Now they do not like what they crafted and forced on the rest of Egypt?
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.