Last Update 11:45
Monday, 18 November 2019

Shura Council verdict likely to change little: Political figures

Sunday's verdicts ruling the Shura Council and the Constituent Assembly unconstitutional come too late to have a meaningful impact, argue some members of the Egyptian opposition

Ahram Online , Sunday 2 Jun 2013
Shura Council
File photo: A general view shows the Shura Council during its meeting in Cairo May 25, 2013. (Photo: Reuters)
Views: 2825
Views: 2825

Egypt's High Constitutional Court has ruled unconstitutional a law governing elections for the Shura Council, the upper house of parliament.

The ruling on Sunday made it clear that the Council would not be dissolved until a new House of Representatives, the lower house of parliament, convenes. According to Article 230 of the constitution the council is immune from dissolution until a lower house is elected. The constitution also gives the upper house temporary authority to pass legislation after a similar court order caused the dissolution of Egypt's People's Assembly in June 2012.

'No practical effect'

The Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) stated Sunday that the court ruling on the Shura Council, albeit legitimate, has 'no practical effect' since the Shura Council cannot be dissolved.

Essam El-Erian, a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party and a Shura Council member, said the ruling could, however, mean a reduction of the Council's four-year term.

“Or a presidential decree could be issued to hold supplementary elections for the one-third [of Council members affected by the ruling],” El-Erian added in a statement published on Facebook.

The second scenario is unlikely, he added.

The Council must ratify a Shura Council electoral law before the lower house is elected and convenes, because the Council is tasked with passing legislation until the lower house is elected, El-Erian said.

A date for House of Representative elections is yet to be set.

Mohamed Mahsoub, deputy head of the Islamist Wasat party, denounced Sunday's court ruling because “the constitution, which was approved by the people, has 'immunised' the Shura Council.”

“The Egyptian people endowed the Shura Council with full legislative powers when they voted in the constitutional referendum. No entity can call for its dissolution or interfere in its work,” said Mahsoub, who resigned as minister of parliamentary affairs in December in protest at PM Hisham Qandil continuing in his job, via Facebook.

The court also ruled that the law regulating elections for the constitution-drafting Constituent Assembly was unconstitutional.

It remains uncertain how the ruling will affect the constitution and whether actions and decisions taken under it will be annulled.

The Administrative Court still has to decide how to apply Sunday's court verdict and whether it will have any impact on the assembly and the constitution that was ratified by a national referendum in December 2012.

Sunday's rulings are the latest in a series of court orders challenging the legitimacy of the country's top political institutions. The Islamist-dominated People's Assembly (re-named the House of Representatives) was dissolved in June 2012 following a court order, two days before the presidential election runoff.

'Slow justice'

Founder of the Constitution Party Mohamed ElBaradei said on twitter on Sunday "the verdict of the High Constitutional Court is an expected outcome of the political bullying that toppled legitimacy and led to the state of collapse we are living in."

ElBaradei called for a new constituent assembly and a new election law - both to be ratified by the people in a popular referendum.

April 6 Youth Movement founder Ahmed Maher said Sunday's ruling was correct but comes eight months too late, which will negate its effect.

Former MP Ziad El-Eleimy of the Egyptian Social Democratic Party expressed similar sentiments.

"Slow justice is great injustice. The delay of the verdict makes it hard to implement. The Shura Council will remain in place until after elections for the House of the Representatives. And the Constituent Assembly is invalid but the constitution will remain because it was ratified by a national referendum,” El-Eleimy via Twitter on Sunday.

El-Eleimy said the solution must be political and based on consensus “so we can exit this vortex that is taking us into the unknown.”

Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

02-06-2013 10:18pm
logic please
be logical if it looks like a duck, walks like duck, and quacks like a duck, it's a duck, don't be like humpty dumpty in illogic land, saying a word means whatever he wants it to mean. if it's written be people who will not subject to it (by non-legislators), and its supported by an extraordinary majority (over 50% of eligible voters), and it looks like a liberal-democratic document (inalienable rights, checks and balances), then it's a constitution. whereas, Ikhwan's process and document are the opposite
Comment's Title

© 2010 Ahram Online.