Last Update 16:41
Saturday, 19 October 2019

Mossad former head: Cairo's pro-Gaza protests herald shifting attitude towards Israel

Efraim Halevy, former head of Israeli intelligence,links recent pro-Gaza protests and the broader Arab pro-democracy movements to shifts in Israel's strategic environment

Saleh Naami , Monday 11 Apr 2011
Views: 6547
Views: 6547

Former Mossad director Efraim Halevy said that protests organised in front of the Israeli embassy in Cairo to demonstrate against Israeli air raids on Gaza undeniably signal a change in Israel’s strategic environment.

In an article published Monday in Israel’s daily Yediot Ahronot, Halevy said that these protests and the new position taken by the current rulers of Egypt are proof that Israel’s freedom of action in Gaza is now restrained.

Halevy made clear that the transformations taking place in the Arab world – particularly in Egypt – must prompt Israel to change its policies on Gaza, expanding them beyond the ‘security solutions’ used to confront challenges posed by the Palestinian resistance.

The most important conclusion reached by Israel in the wake of the Arab revolutions, said Halevy, is that it cannot deal with the West Bank and Gaza as two distinct geographical and political entities. Furthermore, Israel must create a political plan which could convince Hamas to stop firing rockets into Israel.

Halevy explained that practical experience has proven the failure of depending on military might in facing Palestinian resistance, especially considering the fact that the Gaza resistance has never been deterred by any Israeli military operation targeting it.

Halevy pointed out that Israel’s dilemma with reference to Gaza lies in its inability to form a clear policy towards it, citing a WikiLeaks cable which shows that General Yoav Galant, commander of Operation Cast Lead in 2008, was not aware of the nature of the political goal Israel was trying to achieve from the campaign.

Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

Ibrahim A. Ibrahim
11-04-2011 07:36pm
The underwritten is in regard the double standard of NATO towards our nations, if you please post in your article I would be very thank full. Why NATO is hesitating to welcome the AU’s peace initiative on Libya. From its inception the OAU currently AU has been a tool manipulated and driven its entire agenda by the so called donors, and also called partners. African Union did not run its own agenda uncontrolled by outsiders due to direct and indirect intervention and at times threat by other stake holders on the power play to the continent. It has been driven out of its way to accommodate the outsiders and implement its agenda that include harming its own member states. Recently, one of its founding member countries Libya has been a real test to the validity of African Union. The wave of change that hit the Arab world and Northern part of Africa impacted Libya. All may agree on the right for change of Libya by Libyans, because first and foremost it is their country and they a
Comment's Title

© 2010 Ahram Online.