Last Update 21:59
Monday, 21 October 2019

UN rejects Palestinian resolution to end Israel's occupation

AP , Wednesday 31 Dec 2014
UN
Argentina's United Nations Ambassador Maria Cristina Perceval, right, and Russian Foreign Minister Vitaly Churkin, second from left, vote during a meeting of the UN Security Council at the United Nations headquarters Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2014 (Photo: AP)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2118
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2118

The Security Council rejected a Palestinian resolution demanding an end to Israeli occupation within three years late Tuesday, a blow to an Arab campaign to get the UN's most powerful body to take action to achieve an independent state of Palestine.

The United States, Israel's closest ally, had made clear its opposition to the draft resolution, insisting on a negotiated peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, not an imposed timetable. It would have used its veto if necessary but it didn't have to because the resolution failed to get the minimum nine "yes" votes required for adoption by the 15-member council.

The resolution received eight "yes" votes, two "no" votes — one from the United States and the other from Australia — and five abstentions.

"We voted against this resolution not because we are comfortable with the status quo. We voted against it because ... peace must come from hard compromises that occur at the negotiating table," US Ambassador Samantha Power said.

She criticized the decision to bring the draft resolution to a vote as a "staged confrontation that will not bring the parties closer." She added that the resolution was "deeply unbalanced" and didn't take into account Israel's security concerns.

"Our effort was a serious effort, genuine effort, to open the door for peace," said Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian UN ambassador. "Unfortunately, the Security Council is not ready to listen to that message."

Until shortly before the vote, council diplomats had expected the resolution to get nine "yes" votes. But Nigeria, which was believed to support the resolution, abstained. Its ambassador, U. Joy Ogwu, echoed the US position saying the ultimate path to peace lies "in a negotiated solution."

The Palestinians, nonetheless, could point to support from two European nations, France and Luxembourg, reflecting the growing impatience especially in Europe over the lack of progress in achieving a two-state solution, and the increasing pressure on governments to do something to end the decades-old conflict.

This impatience, and frustration over the Security Council's paralysis in dealing with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, was echoed by many on the council, including the United States.

Jordan's UN Ambassador Dina Kawar, the Arab representative on the council, said after the vote: "The fact that this draft resolution was not adopted will not at all prevent us from proceeding to push the international community, specifically the United Nations, towards an effective involvement to achieving a resolution to this conflict."

Mansour said Palestinian leaders will be meeting Wednesday "and will decide on next steps."

Before the vote, Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said that the Palestinians can return again to the Security Council, which will have five new members starting Thursday who are viewed as more sympathetic to their cause.

If the council says "no" again, he said, the Palestinians will seek to join the International Criminal Court. They could then press charges against Israel for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

France had put forward a draft resolution setting the outlines for a peace agreement and setting a two-year deadline for negotiations — and French Ambassador Francois Delattre told the council he will be pursuing council action to resolve the conflict.

Israel's image and its standing, especially in Europe, have come under increasing pressure as a result of this summer's Israeli offensive on Gaza and its refusal to halt settlement building.

Israel Nitzan, the Middle East adviser at Israel's UN Mission, delivered a brief message to the Palestinians after the vote: "You cannot agitate ... your way to a state."

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas found himself under pressure at home to proceed with a UN vote and to take other measures after months of unrest with Israel. Pressure increased earlier this month after a Palestinian minister died from a heart attack after scuffling with Israeli security forces in the West Bank at a protest against settlements.

That incident came after months of tensions that included the collapse of the latest round of US-backed peace talks, a 50-day Israeli assault on Gaza, Israeli security measures that restricted Muslim access to a revered holy site in Jerusalem and a spate of Palestinian attacks that killed 11 people.

The violence seems to have mostly subsided in recent weeks but attacks persist.

Russia's UN Ambassador Vitaly Churkin, a strong supporter of the resolution, took issue with the US and others who said it undermined prospects for negotiations.

"We believe this to be a strategic mistake," Churkin said, "just as casting off our proposals to do brainstorming in the council in order to determine ways to reinvigorate the negotiating process, including sending to the Middle East a council mission."

*This story was edited by Ahram Online.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
2



pppp
31-12-2014 02:16pm
1-
4+
unitet state did his job
now arabs and muslims should know what is united state reall face
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



John
31-12-2014 02:13pm
0-
3+
The Tail that wags the Dog ...
It is sad but true, in the case of Mid East peace the tail (Israel) controls the dog (USA) not the other way around. As an American, I am ashamed of my country's stand, and numerous UN votes, that we first ask Israel "how do you like us to vote" before we do. Most US presidents, including Obama, are paralyzed to make the right call, only Carter was brave enough, and he paid for it, by being labeled "as the worst US president" really!! did we forget Bush Jr and Nixon? It is also sad to say that the only hope for the Palestinian case is with Europe, the US is just the Dog who's controlled by the Tail!
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.