Last Update 11:44
Wednesday, 13 November 2019

Missile shield to take years despite US commitment on Gulf security in Camp David

Reuters , Friday 15 May 2015
Camp David
U.S. President Barack Obama speaks while hosting the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) at Camp David in Maryland May 14, 2015 (Photo: Reuters)
Views: 1307
Views: 1307

A U.S.-supplied missile shield to protect Gulf nations against Iranian attacks will take years to complete, requiring a step-up in regional trust, more U.S. sales of sensitive weapons, and intensive U.S. training to avoid mishaps in the volatile region.

A renewed joint commitment to build the regional defense system was one of the few firm outcomes of Thursday's Camp David summit between President Barack Obama and Gulf allies, which were seeking fresh U.S. defense pledges ahead of a possible nuclear deal they fear will empower arch-rival Iran.

Past efforts have stalled due to tension and mistrust within the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) but U.S. and Gulf officials say the time is now ripe to push ahead as Arab nations mount more joint military missions.

A joint statement following the summit said that the GCC states were committed to developing a ballistic missile defense capability, including an early warning system, with U.S. technical help. Washington pledged to fast-track arms transfers to the GCC states and to send a team to the region in the coming weeks to discuss the details.

The Gulf nations fear that the sanctions relief that would accompany a nuclear deal with Tehran due by June 30 could revive Iran's economy and enable it to acquire more accurate and reliable missiles.

An integrated defense system would allow Gulf countries to better repel an Iranian attack, stitching together their radars and interceptors to counter a range of different missiles.

The system would use U.S. early-warning satellites and a mix of U.S. and Gulf radars to detect the launch of an enemy missile and fire a ground- or sea-based missile to destroy it far above the earth.


Lockheed Martin Corp, Raytheon Co. and Northrop Grumman Corp would be key contenders to build a central command-and-control system for the shield since they already do similar work for the U.S. military and key allies.

The biggest challenge to making the shield work would be securing a broad agreement on the rules for dealing with any threats, said Anthony Cordesman, a senior analyst with the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

"You have to work out the entire engagement structure before the first missile is ever launched," Cordesman said.

Getting to that point will require unprecedented agreements between the U.S. military and the GCC, and among the often rancorous Gulf allies, to share sensitive data to avoid the risk of a friendly aircraft being shot down by mistake, experts said.

Intensive U.S.-led training would also be vital to minimize the risk of mishaps, U.S. officials say.

The U.S. military already has 10 Patriot missile batteries to defend against short-range ballistic missiles in the Gulf region and Jordan, as well as a powerful AN-TPY-2 radar system to scan for missile launches, according to U.S. officials.

The Gulf countries are upgrading their existing Raytheon Patriot systems to incorporate new PAC-3 missiles built by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin Corp, and are starting to buy wider-area and longer-range systems like the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), built by Lockheed.

Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir told reporters in Washington this week that Gulf countries would need new ground-based networks and computer terminals to manage those systems.

He said the Gulf countries also wanted longer-range options like the Raytheon SM-3 missile, which has not yet been released for export to the region.

Washington has balked at selling a land-based Aegis combat system to deal with missile threats and any associated SM-3 missiles to Gulf countries, largely because such a system would be best suited to dealing with threats outside the earth's atmosphere that are beyond Iran's capability, Cordesman said.

Washington's decision in December to allow U.S. arms sales to the GCC as an organization - similar to its arrangement with NATO - helped pave the way for progress on integrating missile defense and maritime security systems.

"That's a huge step in the right direction," said a U.S. official, who was not authorized to speak publicly.

Cordesman said Raytheon's new SM-6 missile could prove useful to address Gulf concerns since it could address threats inside the earth's atmosphere as well as outside.

U.S. officials had no immediate comment on whether the Gulf countries had made any formal request for the SM-6 system.

Al-Jubeir cautioned against expecting rapid progress on missile defense integration.

"Those are complicated systems that take time to acquire and then take time to put in place," he said. "You can't buy these things off the shelf and take them home the day you buy them ... One has to come before the other." 

Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

15-05-2015 01:56pm
We know pretty well how it works when it comes to Muslims
If Israel would have asked for missile shield , they would have provided it just within months. They don't want to give any protection to middle eastern countries, so want to drag it for years.
Comment's Title
16-05-2015 08:16am
Likes & Dislikes
I won't reply to the above comment because it's nonsense. I want to comment on the 4500 "thumb-downs" it received, in an article read only 250 times (till writing this). When will Al-Ahram stop this absurdity, done by humans or robots, which is spread throuout the site and causing readers confusion if not mistrust.
16-05-2015 06:17am
Shiite gameplan
Actually Israel developed its own shield solely based on its own with minimal if any help to protect itself ..what it does not have to protect itself from its own people . Trouble is if Iran gets nukes it will use them to threaten all its neighbours that don't threaten mutually assured destruction. MAD. the next step is for Iran-Iraq. To smear the Saudi Kingdom as "Zionist" and watch it fall into. Their hands like a piece of ripe fruit.

© 2010 Ahram Online.