Last Update 22:17
Friday, 15 November 2019

Iran candidates exchange barbs in fiery final debate

AFP , Friday 12 May 2017
Rouhani
Iranian President and presidential candidate Hassan Rouhani speaks during a campaign rally in Tehran on May 9, 2017 (Photo: AFP)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1911
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1911

Iran's six presidential candidates exchanged barbs in their final debate on Friday, accusing each other of corruption and economic mismanagement a week ahead of the election.

Seeking a second four-year term, moderate President Hassan Rouhani has been on the offensive all week, framing the vote as a choice between greater social freedoms and repression.

But the theme of Friday's debate was the economy, where continued stagnation and high unemployment have given plenty of ammunition to his conservative opponents.

Hardline Tehran mayor Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf repeatedly returned to his theme that Rouhani's administration had only benefited the "four percenters" at the top of society.

"The country is facing an economic crisis, with unemployment, recession and inflation. A tree that has not born any fruit in four years will not yield anything positive in the future," said Ghalibaf.

"Tens of thousands of our factories have been closed and they are continuing to close."

Rouhani hit back that Tehran's nuclear deal with world powers had ended sanctions and brought a windfall from the return of oil sales over the past year that could now be invested.

"We want to allocate $15 billion for investments... and $3-5 billion for supporting the poor and needy," he said.

He said handouts would be focused on rural and deprived areas -- places where conservatives have tended to perform more strongly.

Cleric and jurist Ebrahim Raisi is seen as the leading conservative, though still a distant second to Rouhani in unofficial polls ahead of the May 19 vote.

He kept up his efforts to reach out to poor and religiously conservative voters.

"The people expect government members to fear God," he said.

"Poverty has increased with this government from 23 percent to 33 percent. We must increase direct aid to the poor," he added, accusing Rouhani's government of only boosting subsidies at the last minute to grab votes.

"Why did you wait for the election campaign to increase aid? Why didn't you do it four years ago? The people are intelligent and they will decide."

The six candidates selected to run by the conservative-dominated Guardian Council are evenly split between moderate-reformists on one side and hardliners on the other, and the debates have the feel of two teams clashing.

Some of the fiercest exchanges were between Ghalibaf and Iran's reformist vice president, Eshaq Jahangiri, who accused each other of corruption and making empty promises.

"We should check how many of the statements by the candidates are real and just slogans to fool the people," said Jahangiri.

He said the Tehran municipality had sold properties at cut-rate prices to allies, while Ghalibaf hit back that the vice president had himself acquired huge houses on the cheap.

Ghalibaf's attacks appeared carefully prepared, with documents alleging to back up his claims released on to social media within minutes of him speaking.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.