Last Update 10:59
Thursday, 18 July 2019

Palestinian reconciliation efforts in Cairo: A fresh start?

Ahmed Eleiba , Thursday 19 Jul 2018
Officials leading the Palestinian reconciliation
Top left, Egyptian General Intelligence Major General Abbas Kamel, Top right, Azzam Al-Ahmed, head of Fatah’s reconciliation delegation, bottom left, Saleh Al-Arouri, deputy head of the Hamas political bureau and bottom right, Ziad Al-Nakhala, deputy leader of Islamic Jihad movement
Share/Bookmark
Views: 4082
Share/Bookmark
Views: 4082

Leaders from Palestinian factions made separate visits to Cairo in an attempt to resurrect talks in the framework of the Egyptian-brokered Palestinian reconciliation process which ran aground following the failed assassination attempt against Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah during his visit to Gaza in March.

The visits began with a Hamas delegation headed by Saleh Al-Arouri, deputy head of the Hamas political bureau.

When those discussions ended on Friday, a delegation of Islamic Jihad officials led by the movement’s deputy leader Ziad Al-Nakhala arrived, to be followed in turn by Azzam Al-Ahmed, head of Fatah’s reconciliation delegation.

All three delegations met with the new director of Egyptian General Intelligence Major General Abbas Kamel for the first time.

Parties interviewed by Al-Ahram Weekly gave the impression a fresh start had been made in the stalled reconciliation process.

Speaking to the Weekly by phone, senior Hamas official Ahmed Youssef said: “In my opinion, and based on what I’ve heard from the delegation that went to Cairo, there is cause for optimism, especially as regards the outlook of the new leadership in Egyptian General Intelligence and their receptiveness to all ideas.

I have heard the same from Islamic Jihad. What this means is that understandings are in place that could lead to a new Egyptian initiative sponsoring Palestinian factional dialogue.”

He explained that through such a dialogue Cairo would be able to move beyond Fatah and Hamas’ mutual demands and recriminations, sound out all Palestinian factions and, on the basis of its findings, formulate a new proposal for ending the more than decade old schism that has fragmented the Palestinian cause.

According to Youssef, a vision exists for restructuring the Palestine Liberation Organisation in a way that might lead to the inclusion of Hamas and Jihad though the idea still needs fleshing out “so as to make it possible for us to realise a comprehensive umbrella that embraces all Palestinian national forces in order to contend with the current challenges, foremost of which is the so-called deal of the century”.

The Hamas official added: “What I have understood from speaking with officials in the Palestinian Authority [PA] and people close to President Mahmoud Abbas is that they share a sense of anxiety and a belief in the need for some kind of mechanism to emerge from the current dilemma.

They agree that Egypt is the only Arab party that can help with this. The aim is to produce a comprehensive Palestinian project with Egypt’s support and Arab backing.”

Palestinian reconciliation has run up against obstacles other than the assassination attempt against Hamdallah.

Although Hamas dissolved its Gaza administrative committee, and thus removed what had been a major spanner in reconciliation efforts, pending security issues remain, not least the need for Hamas to hand over its weapons to the PA.

Another sticking point centred on government employees hired during the period of Hamas rule in Gaza without PA approval.

Against this backdrop the Hamas website Al-Risala reported that, while in Cairo, Fatah’s Central Committee head Azzam Al-Ahmed had reiterated PA ultimatums only to encounter the insistence, on the part of Egyptian Intelligence, on the need to agree on a formula that avoided the PA’s “exclusionary demands”.

In the same spirit, according to the website, Egyptian intelligence authorities refused to relay to the Hamas delegation Fatah messages that “conveyed threats or that did not contribute to forging a basis for genuine partnership in reconciliation”.

It appears that the Fatah leadership was persuaded by the Egyptian position. In remarks to the press following his visit to Cairo, Al-Ahmed said: “Egypt continues its genuine and serious efforts to end the [Palestinian] rift... Egypt will designate the dates and the parties that will take part in the next meetings in Cairo or elsewhere in order to attain this end... The purpose of these meetings is to identify the final formula for the mechanisms to implement the reconciliation in accordance with the 2011 and 2017 agreements... Everyone is keen to implement the reconciliation.”

“The general impression we have from the talks up to now is that there is general optimism and appreciation for the role Egypt is playing in the treatment of the Palestinian question in general,” Islamic Jihad political bureau member Nafez Azzam told the Weekly by phone.

On reports that the PA is persisting with its ultimatum that either Hamas hand over all governing institutions in Gaza to the PA or bear sole responsibility for failure of the reconciliation process, Nafez Azzam said: “Progress is being made in the handover, albeit slowly. We believe that, in spite of the plethora of details, everyone subscribes to the political demand efforts be intensified to attain the desired goal.”

He stressed that talks were still in progress, communications were continuing nonstop and that Cairo would sustain its drive to overcome all obstacles.

It is noteworthy that Saleh Al-Arouri headed the Hamas delegation to Cairo instead of Yehia Sinwar, the Hamas military leader who once declared that he would “cut off the leg of anyone who obstructed reconciliation”.

Sources in Cairo and in Hamas ascribe this to the fact that Sinwar’s threat implied that Gaza was to blame for the lack of progress, and that the obstructions were military in nature, when in fact the obstacles that now need to be overcome concern the political management of the reconciliation process, and at a time when Hamas is moving closer to Cairo.

Another possible reason cited for the change in the Hamas delegation head was that the recent round of talks was “exploratory”.

Egyptian mediation has been active on another level. Cairo has been trying to broker a new truce between Gaza and Israel against the backdrop of escalation surrounding the Palestinian “March for Return” demonstrations.

Though on Sunday Islamic Jihad announced that it would agree to a truce the terms had not yet been fixed before both sides moved towards a re-escalation.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatened to renew military action in response to incendiary kites and balloons launched from Gaza into Israel.

On Sunday evening Israel’s military announced it had reinforced its Iron Dome batteries in the south.

Islamic Jihad political bureau member Nafez Azzam told the Weekly: “It is not us who are seeking escalation. We believe that confrontation is pointless and we are acting accordingly.

Israel, however, is determined to escalate. The March for Return demonstrations are peaceful yet dozens have been martyred from among the ranks of the resistance. Even so we are responding positively to Egyptian efforts to restore calm. I believe the situation will move in that direction.”

*A version of this article appears in print in the 19 July 2018 edition of Al-Ahram Weekly under the headline: A fresh start? 

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.