Last Update 23:3
Cairo's Doctors Syndicate hosts Syria conference
Interventionist debate dominates conference on 'assistance' to Syrian pro-democracy movement as speakers shift focus to topics of Arabism, Zionism and imperialism
Nada El-Kouny , Thursday 1 Mar 2012
Share/Bookmark
Views: 122
syria big
Syrian youth chant slogans beneath revolutionary flag outside protest tent in Tahrir Square, Cairo, Egypt, February, 2012 (Photo: AP)

A conference on Syria held at Cairo's Doctors Syndicate Tuesday saw its focus shift from the development of a support movement into a discussion dominated by pro- and anti-interventionist rhetoric.

Entitled “The Liberation of Cairo Ends in Syria,” the conference was organised by the Federation of Arab Doctors in cooperation with the Social Consensus Initiative (SCI) – consisting of number of Egyptian political parties, civil society organisations, unions and student activists – as a project aiming to “work towards establishing a social movement in support of the Syrian revolution.”

With an audience dominated by youth in addition to researchers and Egypt-based Syrians, the forum saw presentations aimed at addressing ways in which assistance could be provided to Syria.

Discussions, however, veered away from organisational issues, taking a more political turn. Arguments descended into talk of imperialism, Zionism and Arabism.

Rabab El-Mahdi, a political science professor at the American University in Cairo (AUC), stressed that hopes for the success of the ongoing Arab uprisings rested on the outcome of Syria's popular revolt. Referring to a popular quote, the AUC professor stated, “If Egypt is the beating heart of the Arab world, Syria is its intellectual mind.”

The region is witnessing an upsurge of "Arabism from below" as opposed to the top-down approach characteristic of president Gamal Abdel-Nasser's regime.

"It is a unity amongst the Arab people, and the unity of its struggle and resistance against the Zionist imperialist power,” clarified Rabab. The uprisings, she adds, are an opportunity to join these two ends – Egypt and Syria – of resistance against Israel.

El-Mahdi's most politically charged statement, however, came when she posited that just as there is a revolution there is also a counter-revolution that has arisen due to the country's geo-strategic position.

The AUC professor pointed to Saudi Arabia and Qatar’s interest in arming the opposition, the Free Syrian Army, as well as the regional and international support of the Syrian revolution taking form in the legitimisation of the Syrian National Council (SNC).

“They are intentionally taking part in a counter-revolution and the expansion of imperialism in the region, which would lead to the disintegration of the Arab umma (nation),” El-Mahdi stated.

“It is important to point out that this counter-revolutionary project is very much a nationalist project as much as the revolution is.”

Counter-revolutionary efforts, however, should not discourage support efforts. Rather, supporters should "work towards strengthening a popular base separate from those of the international bodies like that of the United Nations,” she clarified.

El-Mahdi's reading of the situation did not sit well with a number of audience members and several of the other speakers.

An audience member stated that while the priority of the Syrian revolution is to try to be as peaceful as possible, when it comes to choosing between the people and the nation, the priority should go to the people: “If this leads to Arab intervention, then why not?”

Among the video presentations, which supplemented the talks, was a video tribute to the Free Syrian Army. The tribute ironically resembled patriotic propaganda in support of Syria's strongman Bashar Al-Assad.

Nezar Kharrat from the Brotherhood-dominated Syrian Revolution Association in Egypt (SRAE) claimed that foreign intervention has already taken root in Syria via the Russians and Iranians. Kharrat stated that the Assad regime allowed this to happen.

“The killing of innocent children in the street is not peaceful; we do not want [the pro-democracy movement] to be peaceful."

In response, El-Mahdi emphasised, "Anyone who believes than any form of military intervention in Syria can have a positive effect is delusional...This is Syria not Libya.”

It was a heated discussion, but not all attendees were satisfied with the debate. A Syrian audience member and a professor of law at a private university in Cairo expressed frustration at the time spent discussing foreign military intervention.

The time could have been better spent, according to the professor, brainstorming forms of assistance and working towards their materialisation.   





Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 4000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

© 2010 Ahram Online. Advertising