Last Update 14:10
Wednesday, 16 October 2019

The US on trial in NY: The Russell Tribunal on Palestine

The Russell Tribunal on Palestine holds its final session of in New York to examine UN and US complicity in the denial of Palestinian rights

Noura Erakat, Saturday 6 Oct 2012
Palestinian
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1667
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1667

Last week at the UN General Assembly, Barack Obama, President of the world's most powerful country, exalted the United Nations and the ideals upon which it was built. Namely, that  "people can resolve their differences peacefully, that diplomacy can take the place of war; and that in an interdependent world, all of us have a stake in working towards greater opportunity and security for our citizens."

Yet, as global superpower and a veto-holding member of the UN Security Council, the United States has perpetuated one of the most significant and enduring conflicts of the 20th century. By shielding Israel from accountability and by providing it with unequivocal diplomatic, economic, and military support, the United States has severely reduced the chances of establishing peace and justice among Palestinians and Israelis. To the contrary, by enabling Israeli colonial-settler expansion and militarism, the United States has inflamed tensions and entrenched chauvinistic ethno-national separatist ideals. But who has the audacity, let alone the ability, to successfully challenge the excesses of the global superpower? For the past six decades since Israel's establishment, no nation, or group of nations, has been successful. Alternatively, like they have done in the past, ordinary people are taking a stab at it.

This weekend, the fourth and final session of the Russell Tribunal on Palestine will convene in New York to examine UN and US complicity in the denial of Palestinian rights. Its purpose is to serve as an international "people's tribunal" and to "prevent the crime of silence." It emulates the original Russell Tribunal founded by British philosopher Bertrand Russell, to investigate the legality of the United States' military interventions in Southeast Asia, namely in Vietnam and Laos. Russell explained, "We are not judges. We are witnesses. Our task is to make mankind bear witness to these terrible crimes and to unite humanity on the side of Vietnam." This present-day effort seeks to unite humanity on the side of Palestinians and Israelis alike who share a vision of co-existence, equality, freedom, and dignity. The eminent jurists and witnesses, including Angela Davis, Roger Waters, Ronnie Kasrils, and Mairead Maguire, will pay particular attention to the United States' detrimental role in the conflict.

Between 1949 and 2008, the U.S. provided Israel more than 103.6 billion USD in official aid, making it the largest recipient of U.S. foreign assistance since World War II. Israel has used this taxpayer money not to protect itself nor to promote co-existence, but to bulldoze Palestinian homes, to uproot their olive groves, and to forcibly and violently displace Palestinian families so that Israel can build a colonial-settlement state for the benefit of Jewish-persons only.  Since the beginning of the US-brokered "peace process," the number of colonial-settlers in the Occupied Palestinian Territory has grown from 100,000 to nearly 600,000 persons making peace and justice ever more elusive.

Rather than supplant war with diplomacy, between FY 2000 and 2008, US taxpayer money was used to pay for 670 million weapons and related equipment to Israel, including the militarized D-9 Caterpillar bulldozer that ran over and killed American citizen and peace activist, Rachel Corrie. Israel has blamed Rachel for her own murder and the US did not blink an eye at the callous disregard of its own citizen who upheld those ideals attributed to the late Ambassador Chris Stevens.

President Obama rightfully decried the violence and intolerance that led to the murder of Ambassador Stevens and proclaimed that such behavior has no place at "our" United Nations. Yet, for the past six decades, and especially the last two, the United States has single-handedly undermined the authority and efficacy of the UN, whose purpose is to promote peace, security, and stability through non-forceful means.

Consider that in response to the Winter 2008/09 Israeli offensive against Gaza, the UN sponsored a fact-finding mission to investigate alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity and to settle the dispute using legal and diplomatic recourse. In response, the US Senate passed Resolution 138 and condemned the Mission. The Obama Administration went further and used economic and diplomatic pressure to coerce nations, as well as the Palestinian Authority, to restrict their support for the Goldstone Report.

Similarly, in response to the International Court of Justice's Advisory Opinion declaring the route of the Separation Wall illegal for running through the Occupied Territory, the US Congress passed House Resolution 713 and condemned the ICJ ruling as abuse for a “narrow political purpose.”  This is to say nothing of the US’s vetoes: between 1972 and 1997, the US used its veto 32 times to shield Israel from rebuke. This amounted to nearly half of the 69 vetoes the US cast since the founding of the UN.

By neutering the UN and shielding Israel from any form of accountability, the United States has also engendered more intolerance and hatred among Israelis towards Palestinians. In late August, a group of Jewish-Israeli children attempted to lynch a Palestinian boy in East Jerusalem because he "made passes at Jewish girls." How is it that we as a nation have overcome this same bitter and dangerous racism amongst whites towards blacks, and yet sanction it by our "closest and unique ally" whom we deem the only democracy in the Middle East?

This is not new. In 1985, as Black South Africans together with their allies globally rallied against Apartheid, President Reagan continued to sing the praises of our unique ally in Africa. The US categorized Nelson Mandela as a terrorist and did not remove him from its terrorist watch list until 2008. Like the destructive role it plays today, the US at the time used its veto to stonewall an international resolution to the conflict. In response, ordinary people in the US and across the globe united in a campaign of boycott, divestment, and sanctions against Apartheid South Africa until its dismantlement in  the early nineties.

In the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the US has demonstrated itself as unable and unwilling to broker peace and has become central to the problem. Alice Walker, a Pulitzer-Prize winning author and a jurist for the Russell Tribunal, explains "…the United States is complicit because it backs Israel no matter what. And I think this is corrupting, I think for our young people especially, to see that…justice in this case is never even thought about."

The purpose of the Tribunal is to collectively think about justice as a civic community and to take the lead where our governments have proven inept and counterproductive. This final session of the Tribunal, with an emphasis on US complicity, is particularly apt, since it points the finger at the conflict's financier and enabler and inwards at the US taxpayers and voters who have the agency to do something about it. President Obama may have the microphone at the UN, but it is an American constituency that has the choice to lead where the government has failed.

This article was published on Jadaliyya on October, 5 2012 

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
3



A.K.
09-10-2012 12:06pm
3-
2+
Israel needs to stop being an "Apartheid" State
Thank you Noura Erakat for this article. Indeed, people can resolve their differences peacefully, if they have the good will that is. I mentioned in another comment that the peoples of Israel and Palestine need to think more about the future and think less about the past, though they can learn from it to avoid repeating the same mistakes. Of course, each side in this conflict has miserable and very sad stories to tell about the agression and violence of the other side and the loss of loved ones; but one does not need to be a genius to observe and conclude that Israel occupied and annexed by force lands belonged to Palestine people in 1967. One does not need to be a genius to observe that the Israeli Government discriminates against Palestinians and even against some jewish people (for example from Africa). You can listen to these views expressed by Israeli citizens. Let us face it, most people born from the 1940s onwards in both sides have been brain-washed, but if the leaders in Israe
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



phil S
06-10-2012 08:51pm
6-
5+
Prejudicial Comments
This article is extremely one sided in that it completely ignores Goldstone's retraction of a large portion of his Report and does not even mention Palestinian violence towards Israelis
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Father Dave
08-10-2012 04:59am
3-
4+
Prejudicial?
But the conflic is one-sided! It's largely children throwing stones at the IDF's tanks and helicopter gunships.
1



phil S
06-10-2012 08:00pm
2-
2+
Prejudicial Comments
This article is extremely one sided in that it completely ignores Goldstone's retraction of a large portion of his Report and does not even mention Palestinian violence towards Israelis
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Father Dave
08-10-2012 05:03am
4-
4+
who is being prejudicial?
But it is a one-sided conflict. The Palestinian resistance is largely composed of children throwing stones at the IDF's tanks and helicopter gunships. The fact that Goldstone bowed under pressure and back-peddled on the report that bore his name further illustrates the problem. The report, incidentally, which was authored by others as well as Goldstone, was not retracted
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.