Last Update 22:59
Erdogan & Kurds: A win-win game
After Kurdish leader Abdullah Ocalan called for a ceasefire with Turkey on 21 March, what is the next step?
Bassem Aly , Monday 15 Apr 2013
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1092
Erdogan
Prime Minister Erdogan, accompanied by his wife Emine, throws carnations to his supporters as he enters the hall for the congress, 30 September, 2012 (Photo: Reuters)

Abdullah Ocalan's call for a ceasefire with the Turkish state was unarguably something different. Throughout the three-decade-long conflict almost 45,000 people have lost their lives.

The message of the banned Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) leader, held in his island prison of Imrali south of Istanbul since 1999, was watched by millions of people across the country on 21 March.

Analysts argue the situation is moving towards granting Kurds the right to self-governance, not full independence, due to a series of social and political concerns.

Why a ceasefire now?

Turkey welcomed Ocalan’s ceasefire call that came after months of talks between both sides.

The message by Ocalan did not specify a concrete roadmap for the implementation of the peace process.

Instead, Ocalan said it was time for "politics to prevail, not arms," and called for his movement to engage in a "democratic model."

“The 30-year-old war between Turkish troops and Kurdish rebels has come to a point of fatigue.The warring sides are tired, generally ripe for peace,” Yavuz Baydar, a columnist at the Turkish Today's Zaman newspaper , told Ahram Online.

Baydar said the governing Islamist Justice and Development AK Party realises Ocalan enjoys huge popularity and authority over Kurds, so they have decided to talk to him.

Other reasons for the ceasefire’s timing are Turkey’s strong economic growth, and the popularity of Prime Minister and AK leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

In January, Turkish media reported the government and Ocalan had agreed on a roadmap to end the conflict.

Yet, at that time, the pro-Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) urged the government to release Ocalan to freely take part in talks, describing them as “not at the stage of fully-fledged ceasefire talks.”

This was preceded by an earlier government statement revealing the intelligence services had for weeks been involved in talks with Ocalan to solve the dilemma of the Kurds, who represent around 15 million of the country's 75-million population.

Alex Christie-Miller, the Istanbul-based correspondent of the Christian Science Monitor, said Erdogan had been speaking about resolving the Kurdish conflict for few years and the AK is less “ideologically” opposed to Kurdish demands.

“The basic reasons to settle the conflict are obvious: its cost in economic and human terms, and the fact that peace in the southeast will better allow Turkey to exploit its lucrative relationship with the Kurdish Regional Government, particularly in terms of oil contracts,” he said.

Christie-Miller added that the chaos in Syria has led to the empowerment of the Kurds near the border, which has jeopardised Turkey's security situation. There are also growing signs of Iranian support for the PKK.

No full independence

Ocalan, 64, known as "Apo," or uncle, is branded a "baby killer" by many Turks. According to AFP, a release bid prior to the ceasefire was refused by Ankara, leading to further unrest.

Since the Turkish military and Ocalan-led rebels took up arms in 1984, the Kurds have insisted on their right to self-rule in the Kurdish-majority southeast.

The failure of the latest round of government-Kurdish talks in 2012 was followed by PKK attacks against Turkish security forces in Ankara, killing three civilians and wounding 34 others.

Mohamed Abdelkader, Turkish affairs expert at the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, argued that Kurdish independence would be totally “off the table.”

“Kurdish demands are mostly about winning cultural and political rights. The highest number of Kurds live in Turkish-majority, not Kurdish, cities,” Abdelkader noted.

“Kurds occupy top-level positions in all state institutions, including the military, and almost 2 million people come from mixed families.”

Erdogan, who took office in 2002, granted more cultural and language rights to the Kurdish community, but the latter kept calling for other demands such as the more political representation in the national assembly and an amnesty for PKK leaders.

Kurds back Erdogan for president?

Erdogan’s AK party have won three consecutive elections since 2002, ending a long history of weak governing coalitions usually interrupted by military coups.

Turkey's political transformation has spread beyond our country's borders and has become an example for all Muslim countries, he said at the AK party congress last September.

Erdogan stressed Turkey’s need to draft a new constitution to replace the one written after a military takeover in 1980, a process that is currently taking place.

Critics, however, accuse him seeking to create a presidential political system and take the president’s seat, since he cannot seek another term as premier at the 2015 poll.

William Armstrong, journalist at Turkey’s Hürriyet Daily News, claims Erdogan needs Kurdish support to amend constitutional articles that lack a national consensus, which might motivate AK negotiators to offers concessions in peace talks.

“The AK party already gets the support of the majority of Kurds, and it is important to remember that Ocalan has expressed potential support for Erdogan as the next president,” he emphasised.

People from diverse sides of the spectrum support Erdogan after his success in tripling per capita income and re-establishing Turkey as a regional power.

Even the West envisions the Turkish model as an acceptable balance between Islam and democracy for other Muslim states in the region.

“One can take two views. There is a sceptical line that suggests Erdogan is trying to strengthen his own position and gain support from the country's sizeable Kurdish population,” James Ker-Lindsay, senior research fellow at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), said.

“However, there are also good reasons to suggest that this is about a leader who has recognised that a political solution to a nasty, brutal conflict that has cost tens of thousands of lives is now needed.”  





Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 4000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
2



mohammed moiduddin
15-04-2013 08:01am
2-
1+
Erdogan for Caliphate of the Middle East
He is a great leader if he can pull this off. He should free Syria, and the Turkey will again be a leader to help the Islamic World
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



K. Kyriakides
14-04-2013 09:35pm
0-
4+
Turkish scoiety DNA can't allow the process to succeed
There is no overlap between the maximum of possible Turkish CONCESSIONS and the minimum of acceptable Kurdish DEMANDS.If such agreement comes about, it will unavoidably be short lived, regardless how much foreign powers may wish it as a precondition to regional designs. The conservative right from either side will not let it be implemented, with the Turkish right being the least patient and most threatened and therefore the one expected to act first, also implicating the Kurdish right via propaganda or incitement or both, in traditional deep state ways, albeit contra to the state's wishes.It is beyond impressive how the various "experts" and international press underestimate the dynamics of latent, and not so latent, unhealthy Turkish nationalism, which appeals to the majority of ethnic Turks. One hundred years of feeding the nationalist sentiment cannot be stricken in a few months or years just because the caliph in-the-making so desires. Plus, Kurdish awareness is not what it used to be. It is in fact more advanced and more healthy than the Turkish nationalists' who see their perfect Turkish world under threat. No matter how things develop, Kurds stand to gain. They know it, thus they enjoy the luxury to stay calm the longer. Besides they waited 90 years to get what was promised to them back in the 1920s. They can afford to wait a while longer. But not as long as Turks think they have.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment

© 2010 Ahram Online. Advertising