Last Update 16:24
Tuesday, 22 October 2019

'Common-sense test' holds Assad responsible: US

Asked about Assad's claims there is no evidence he used the weapons, US Secretary of State John Kerry told reporters in London that 'evidence speaks for itself'

AP , Sunday 8 Sep 2013
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1043
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1043

President Barack Obama's top aide on Sunday pressed the case for "targeted, limited consequential action" to degrade the capabilities of Syrian President Bashar Assad to carry out chemical weapons attacks as the White House mounted a major push to win support from a divided Congress and skeptical American public for a military strike.

White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough asserted that a "common-sense test" dictates that the Syrian government is responsible for a chemical weapons attack that Obama says demands a U.S. response. But he said the Obama administration lacks "irrefutable, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence" that lawmakers who will start voting on military action this week are seeking.

"This is not a court of law. And intelligence does not work that way," White House chief of staff Denis McDonough said, part of a five-network public relations blitz Sunday to build support for limited strikes against Assad.

"The common-sense test says he is responsible for this. He should be held to account," McDonough said of the Syrian leader who for two years has resisted calls from inside and outside his country to step down.

McDonough pressed the case for "targeted, limited consequential action to deter and degrade" the capabilities of Assad's regime "to carry out these terrible attacks again.

The U.S., citing intelligence reports, says sarin gas was used in the Aug. 21 attack outside Damascus, and that 1,429 people died, including 426 children.

The number is higher than that, said Khalid Saleh, head of the press office at the anti-Assad Syrian Coalition who was in Washington to lobby lawmakers to back Obama. Some of those involved in the attacks later died in their homes and opposition leaders were weighing releasing a full list of names of the dead.

But the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which collects information from a network of anti-government activists, says it has so far only been able to confirm 502 dead.

In an interview Sunday, Assad told U.S. journalist Charlie Rose there is not conclusive evidence about who is to blame and again suggested the rebels were responsible. From Beirut, Rose described his interview that is set to be released Monday on television shows hosted by Rose.

Asked about Assad's claims there is no evidence he used the weapons, Secretary of State John Kerry told reporters in London: "The evidence speaks for itself."

Obama has planned his own public relations effort. He has scheduled six network interviews on Monday and then a nationally televised speech from the White House on Tuesday, the eve of the first votes in Congress.

On Wednesday, the Democratic-led Senate is expected to hold the first showdown vote over a resolution that would authorize the "limited and specified use" of U.S. armed forces against Syria for no more than 90 days and barring American ground troops from combat. A final vote is expected at week's end.

A vote in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives appears likely during the week of Sept. 16.

Obama faces a tough audience on Capitol Hill. A survey by The Associated Press shows that House members who are staking out positions are either opposed to or leaning against Obama's plan for a military strike by more than a 6-1 margin.

"Lobbing a few Tomahawk missiles will not restore our credibility overseas," said Rep. Mike McCaul, the Texas Republican who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee.

Added Rep. Loretta Sanchez, a California Democrat: "For the president to say that this is just a very quick thing and we're out of there, that's how long wars start."

Nearly half of the 433-member House of Representatives and a third of the 100-member Senate remain undecided, the AP survey found.

"Just because Assad is a murderous tyrant doesn't mean his opponents are any better," said Sen. Ted Cruz, a conservative Texas Republican.

But some of Assad's opponents are pleading for aid.

"The world is watching, and Syrians are wondering: When is the international community going to act and intervene to protect them?" said Saleh, the spokesman for the Western-backed opposition seeking U.S. strikes.

On Saturday, a U.S. official released a DVD compilation of videos showing attack victims that the official said were shown to senators during a classified briefing on Thursday. The images have become a rallying point for the administration.

"Those videos make it clear to people that these are real human beings, real children, parents being affected in ways that are unacceptable to anybody, anywhere by any standards," Kerry said in Paris. "And the United States of America that has always stood with others to say we will not allow this — this is not our values, it's not who we are."

But McDonough conceded the United States doesn't have concrete evidence Assad was behind the chemical attacks.

Recent opinion surveys show intense American skepticism about military intervention in Syria, even among those who believe Syria's government used chemical weapons on its people.

Congress, perhaps, is even more dubious.

"It's an uphill slog," said Rep. Mike Rogers, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee who supports strikes on Assad.

"I think it's very clear he's lost support in the last week," Rogers added, speaking of the president.

Complicating the effort in the Senate is the possibility that 60 votes may be required to authorize a strike. Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky said he would consider using Senate procedural maneuvers to delay shutting off debate, but noted such a tactic was unlikely to permanently block a vote. Paul would, however, insist his colleagues consider an amendment to the resolution that would bar Obama from launching strikes if Congress votes against the measure.

Still, Sen. Harry Reid, the Democratic leader, has predicted authorization of military strike against Syria.

While the publicly discussed information lacks a direct link between Assad and the use of chemical weapons, the private briefs are no better, two lawmakers said.

"The evidence is not as strong as the public statements that the president and the administration have been making," said Republican Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan. "There are some things that are being embellished in the public statements. ... The briefings have actually made me more skeptical about the situation."

Republican Rep. Buck McKeon of California, said "they have evidence showing the regime has probably the responsibility for the attacks."

But that's not enough to start military strikes. "They haven't linked it directly to Assad, in my estimation," said McKeon, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

McDonough, an Obama foreign policy adviser dating back to his 2008 presidential campaign, said the dots connect themselves.

"The materiel was used in the eastern suburbs of Damascus that have been controlled by the opposition for some time," McDonough said. "It was delivered by rockets — rockets which we know the Assad regime has and we have no indication that the opposition has."

At the same time, McDonough acknowledged the risks that military action could drag the U.S. into the middle of a brutal civil war and endanger allies such as Israel with a retaliatory attack.

The U.S. is "planning for every contingency in that regard and we'll be ready for that."

Congress resumes work Monday after its summer break, but already a heated debate is under way about Syria.

Vice President Joe Biden planned to host a dinner Sunday night for a group of Senate Republicans.

Obama's national security adviser, Susan Rice, plans to discuss Syria in a speech Monday at the New America Foundation and later meet with members of the Congressional Black Caucus. A bipartisan, classified briefing for Congress is set for Monday and another is slated for Wednesday.

McDonough spoke with ABC's "This Week," CBS' "Face the Nation," NBC's "Meet the Press," CNN's "State of the Union" and "Fox News Sunday." McCaul and Sanchez were on NBC. Cruz appeared on ABC. Rogers and Amash spoke to CBS. Paul was interviewed on Fox. McKeon was on CNN.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
1



Dan Huck
09-09-2013 07:43am
0-
0+
Common Sense says something very different, Mr. McDonough
The common sense test says something very different, Mr. McDonough. Common sense says the US and it's allies should be suspected of a 'false-flag operation'. Common sense says 'cui bono', who benefits? Tell us seriously how the Assad regime would benefit from perpetrating such a horrendous unnecessary murder of it's own citizens. On the other hand, the US, Israel, and our other allies in the area want an excuse to emasculate Syria's offensive and defensive capabilities. Do we deny we desire regime change in Syria? Do we deny we are aiding the rebels? Do we deny the Syrian chemical weapon capability is the most sophisticated in the Mideast, and is an 'existential threat' to the Israelis which dwarfs any nuclear threat posed by the Iranians? What you call common sense is what is used in every 'false flag' operation to pin the blame - it is the apparently obvious. But we and the Israelis are past-masters at tricks of deviousness and subterfuge in order to facilitate aggressive behavior which will benefit ourselves. The Israelis' secret service, the Mossad, uses these terms to define the nature of their function. We want Assad's chemical weapons out of the way desperately. The Israelis and ourselves will do anything underhanded and hidden to accomplish this end. The world knows our budget for just this type of operation is probably 1000 times greater than Syria's total defense budget. Further incriminating us is the evidence produced by UN Chemical Weapons Inspector Carla La Ponte, the respected Swiss judge, and experienced UN administrator regarding Syrian Rebels apparent use of chemical weapons which was barely reported in US media. Add to that Mr. McDonough's suggestion there is no need to wait for the Report of the UN Inspectors, and the ignoring of the French decision of the rightness of waiting for the UN Report. These behaviors on our part, seeming to rush into an attack, and seeming to denigrate the value of real evidence, are despicable behaviors, unworthy of our President, our Congress, and our Nation. Additionally incriminating is the arrogance accompanying our willingness to act unilaterally. This, for our ally Israel, is really the crux of the matter. If we will act unilaterally on the nebulousness of this Syrian 'War Crime', while our own crimes in Iraq, Palestine, etc., are ignored, than Israel will have the confidence it craves that we will do the same with Iran. That we will cook up something together and start that war. The president has given up no rights of decision, SOS Kerry states. We say "We are not taking any (aggressive, illegal, cruel, brutal, dis-proportional) options off the table. We say this mouthing Mr. Netanyahu of Israel's words. Machiavelli recognized and stated that leaders who speak this way are hated by the people.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.