Angered by "unfair" pay cuts, UN staff in Geneva are planning a half-day strike on Tuesday, as dozens of ministers and other dignitaries attend high-level events at the organisation's European headquarters.
"We have tried other forms of protest before, to no avail... They have left us no choice," Ian Richards, who heads the UN staff unions association in Geneva, told AFP Sunday.
He said it remained unclear how many of around 9,500 UN staff members in Geneva would participate in Tuesday's work stoppage, or what impact it would have, pointing out that "this is not like a bus company where the buses just stop."
"But we certainly expect this to have an impact," Richards said.
It comes as UN staff received their first pay slips showing a 3.5-percent salary cut, and with the knowledge that the cut will swell to five percent by June, he said.
The half-day work stoppage will take place during what is arguably one of the busiest weeks of the year at the United Nations in Geneva, with around 100 heads of state, government ministers and country representatives from around the world set to attend the main annual sessions of the UN's top human rights and disarmament bodies.
A spokeswoman for the UN in Geneva, Alessandra Vellucci, told AFP in an email that staff should be "reminded that actions which disrupt or interfere with official activity of the Organisation may be considered contravening staff obligations."
She stressed though that "UN Geneva recognises and respects the right of staff to freedom of association and acknowledges the dissatisfaction of staff" linked to pay cuts.
She said "contingency plans" had been put in place to "minimise the consequences of the possible work stoppage in a period of intense diplomatic activity".
According to a letter sent to all UN agency chiefs late last week by the unions and representatives of UN civil servants, Tuesday will mark only "a first day of action (and will) be followed by others."
The signatories said staff had "lost confidence" in the International Civil Service Commission (ICSC) -- a body appointed by the UN General Assembly to govern UN employees which has ordered deep cuts to pay and benefits for many staff around the globe.
There has been a "substantial deterioration in the employment conditions of UN staff around the world, caused by ICSC's findings, recommendations and decisions," the letter complained, accusing the body of pursuing an "austerity agenda driven by certain member states."
Although the letter did not mention the member states by name, the United States, which has long been the top UN contributor, is clearly among them.
Since President Donald Trump, a vocal UN critic, took office last year, Washington has demanded significant belt-tightening and has threatened deep budget cuts to many UN agencies.
UN employees are considered to be among the highest paid civil servants in the world, with their salaries often complemented by multiple benefits including subsidies for rent, healthcare and educational grants for their children.
Contrary to common perception though, UN staff do pay tax, although it is through an internal UN arrangement in which the organisation deducts the proceeds collected from the membership dues owed by its staff's countries of origin, Vellucci said.
Richards said some review and reform of the UN payment system was not unreasonable, but insisted that "it has to be done in a transparent, balanced and fair way."
For Geneva, ICSC initially said last year a 7.5-percent pay cut was warranted after determining that the cost of living adjustment given to staffers in the pricy Swiss city was excessive.
The unions, which mounted protests over what they termed "significant errors and methodological flaws" in the body's calculations, said they eventually received assurances the cuts would be only 2-3 percent.
"Now finally it is five percent, so the ICSC has gone back on its word," Richards said.
He stressed that Geneva staff were not the only ones feeling the squeeze.
Staff in Bangkok have for instance been informed of a 10-percent cut, while staff in Tokyo are looking at 25 percent, without sufficient justification, he said.