Last Update 21:38
Saturday, 19 October 2019

Britain searches for leaker of cables calling Trump 'inept'

AFP , Monday 8 Jul 2019
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1701
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1701

Britain scrambled on Monday to stem the damage to its relations with Washington by finding the leaker of diplomatic cables in which the UK ambassador called US President Donald Trump "inept".

The confidential telegrams from ambassador Kim Darroch created a political firestorm in London after their publication in the Mail on Sunday newspaper.

One of them called Trump's White House "uniquely dysfunctional" while another characterised the US leader as "incompetent" and "insecure".

Their release came just a month after Trump visibly enjoyed himself during a state visit that included a 41-gun salute welcome at Buckingham Palace and a banquet dinner with the queen.

They also threatened to complicate London's efforts to strike a new US trade agreement that could mitigate potential damage from Britain's withdrawal from the European Union.

Trump fired back by saying that people in his administration were "not big fans" of London's man in Washington.

"We are not big fans of that man and he has not served the UK well. So I can understand it, and I can say things about him but I won't bother," Trump told reporters.

'Very Serious Consequences' 

UK officials defended Darroch as a professional who was carrying out his duties by providing "frank" assessments of the latest developments in Washington.

"Our ambassadors provide honest, unvarnished assessments of politics in their country," a Downing Street spokesman said.

"As you'd expect, contact has been made with the Trump administration setting out our view that we believe the leak is unacceptable."

Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt said the culprit would face "very serious consequences if and when we find out who was responsible".

His US affairs deputy Alan Duncan later told parliament that the police could launch their own investigation "if evidence of criminality is found.

"The most important focus is to establish who is responsible for this despicable leak," Duncan said.

The Daily Telegraph newspaper said such memos are seen by up to 100 people working in the Foreign Office and other government departments.

"But it would require a single official or minister to have access to the whole cache, inevitably casting the spotlight on senior ministers," it wrote.

The immediate suspicion of the London papers fell on Brexit-backing players in a power struggle within the governing Conservative Party.

Coveted Job 

British politics are in for a major revamp once Prime Minister Theresa May ends her three-year spell in power later this month.

Brexit-supporting former foreign minister Boris Johnson is the favourite to replace her in a leadership contest against Hunt.

The winner will get to appoint his own US envoy by the time Darroch's term expires in January.

Commentators note that the official widely tipped for the Washington job was less enthusiastic about Brexit than Johnson or some members of his team.

"There have been reports that Mark Sedwill, the current cabinet secretary, is being lined up for the position," The Guardian's diplomatic editor Patrick Wintour wrote.

But Trump "may be suspicious of Sedwill, and would prefer a true Brexiter".

Wintour wrote that Sedwill "may not fill that bill, but Nigel Farage -- who pretty openly campaigned for the job before Darroch's appointment in 2016 -- does".

Farage has met Trump on several occasions and has brandished his anti-EU credentials by leading his Brexit Party to victory in European election in May.

Farage on Monday called Darroch's memos "pretty irresponsible" but played down interest his in job.

"I'm not a diplomat, and I think that's quite an understatement," he told BBC radio.

But Farage added that he "could be very useful" in forging a better relationship "with an administration that contains friends of mine".

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.