Last Update 0:56
Wednesday, 18 September 2019

Hedge funds bet on oil spike as Israel attack fears grow

The possibility of an Israeli attack on Iran raises expectations of hikes in oil prices; the options market starts to see rallies

Reuters, Friday 17 Aug 2012
Gas flares from an oil production platform at the Soroush oil fields (Photo: Reuters)
Views: 1120
Views: 1120

Hedge funds are quietly laying new bets on a potential spike in oil prices tied to the possibility of an Israeli attack on Iran, skewing the options market to a bullish bias for the first time in six months.

Signs that Israel is losing patience with efforts to curtail Iran's nuclear program, as well as the intensifying conflict in Syria, are giving funds new reason to bet on crude despite a lack of evidence that fundamentals are improving. Activity is muted so far by the summer lull, but could pick up in September.

The renewed premium has been most apparent in futures markets, with benchmark ICE Brent crude gaining 10 per cent over the past two weeks. At the same time, hedge funds boosted their bullish bets in U.S. oil markets a week ago to the highest since early May, regulatory data shows.

"The rally you're seeing now is not because demand is up, but because fear is up," said Charles Gradante, co-founder of New York's Hennessee Group, which invests with hedge funds.

"Some hedge fund managers feel the fundamentals of oil are still negative and the price should go back down, so they're shorting or trying to short. But the majority are net long, waiting for the next shoe to drop in the Middle East."

A flurry of comments by Israeli officials and Israeli media reports over the past week put financial markets on edge by appearing to suggest a strike on Iran could be launched before the U.S. presidential election in November.

While U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Israeli President Shimon Peres have sought to downplay the risk of an imminent unilateral attack, some funds are on guard.

In the U.S. crude oil options market, calls are being bid higher than puts for the first time since February, indicating that demand to buy contracts that would gain from rising prices (calls) is exceeding that to take bearish bets (puts).


So far the bets appear to be more modest than they were last November, when funds loaded up on cheap options after a United Nations report heightened concerns over Iran's nuclear program, or in February and March, when talk of a possible attack by Israel on Iran drove Brent above $125 a barrel.

Those bets failed to pay off: instead of an attack, tougher U.S. and European Union sanctions slowly cut off half of Iran's oil exports, and options volatility slumped.

"We've definitely seen an uptick in upside call buying," said one senior trader at a large investment bank. "It's not as panicked or vociferous as it was last time because the bluff has been called once -- and because it's August."

But some are trying it again. Open interest in December 2012 $100 call options has risen by nearly 5,000 lots -- or 5 million barrels -- in the past two weeks.

"Given the implementation of the Iran embargo, we have crimped supply enough to add some real upside risk potential that could easily manifest itself in a price spike, especially if a conflict in the Middle East is realized," said Chris Thorpe, executive director of energy derivatives at INTL FC Stone.

"There is some fear baked in, for sure."


To be sure, these are still long-odds events, and broader market gauges aren't flashing red yet. Absolute option volatility levels are low with calls and puts at around 30 per cent, just up from near-record lows under 25 per cent in early May, according to Reuters calculations.

And some say that barring a wider regional war, the main event over the next month or so will be the possibility of further quantitative easing from the U.S. Federal Reserve.

"A strike on Iran might add $5, $10, $15 but once people realize that we're not getting a massive Middle East war, it will go back to where it came from," said Lars Steffensen, managing partner at Ebullio Capital Management, which runs a commodity hedge fund.

"Quantitative easing from the Fed will add $15-$20 to crude, and that's a premium that will stay there."


Gradante, who talks regularly with hedge fund managers about their strategies, said many worry that Iran will get involved in the Syrian conflict in some way to hit back at the United States for the Western embargo on Tehran's oil.

As the Syrian civil war takes on overtly sectarian overtones, it also risks drawing in more regional powers, with Sunni-led Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey supporting the rebels and Shi'ite Iran backing the government.

One way for Iran to retaliate against its Western rivals would be to block Egypt's Suez Canal, an integral waterway for Middle East oil tankers. It had previously threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, the world's busiest route for oil, but experts say it may not do this as the bulk of Iranian oil also travels through the strait.

"Disrupting supplies through the canal for a few days itself could make oil go to $120, depending how long the debate takes," Gradante said. "If the U.N. gets involved, it'll easily take more than a week. These are the kind of specific scenarios hedge fund managers are speculating over."


Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

© 2010 Ahram Online.