Last Update 23:16
Sunday, 20 October 2019

How did Mubarak's last PM make it to Egypt's second round of presidential elections?

The Christian vote may have been decisive in propelling Ahmed Shafiq to the second round in Egypt's presidential elections

Gamal Essam El-Din , Saturday 26 May 2012
Supporters of former prime minister Ahmed Shafiq celebrate in Cairo (Photo: Reuters)
Supporters of former prime minister Ahmed Shafiq celebrate in Cairo (Photo: Reuters)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 4811
Share/Bookmark
Views: 4811

Egypt’s landmark presidential race looks to be headed to a decisive run-off round between Mohamed Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate, and Ahmed Shafiq, a veteran loyalist to the regime of ousted president Hosni Mubarak and with strong ties to the military. While it was highly expected that Morsi would make it to the second round, or even win the first round, because of the firm support of millions of Muslim Brotherhood members and other Islamist elements, the same was not true for Shafiq. Expectations were that Amr Moussa, Egypt’s most prominent foreign minister in the last three decades and a symbol of liberalism, was the one who would be able to beat Morsi. It was dismal to liberals that Moussa came fifth, after Morsi, Shafiq, the leftist Hamdeen Sabbahi and the liberal Islamist Abdel Moneim Abul-Fotouh.

Shafiq’s strong performance was not, however, a surprise to all. In fact, according to Gamal Abdel-Gawad, a political analyst with Al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies (ACPSS) and a one time member of Gamal Mubarak's Policies Secretariat, in the last few weeks preceding the presidential election it was clear that Shafiq’s popularity was on the rise.

“Shafiq introduced himself as a man capable of restoring stability and security to Egypt after one and half years of turbulent events and this struck a strong chord with many ordinary citizens,” said Abdel-Gawad. He indicated that a recent poll conducted by ACPSS found that many ordinary citizens are tired of “the irresponsible behaviour of the revolutionary youth movements that toppled Mubarak, and the dismal performance of Islamist forces in parliament in the last few months.”

“Many citizens believe that instead of joining political life and competing for seats in parliament in a peaceful way, the young revolutionary movements opted for violent trouble on the street, first in the form of staging million-man protests at Tahrir Square or in the form of attempts to storm the buildings of the interior ministry, parliament and ministry of defence, or by raising the slogan “Down with military rule,” said Abdel-Gawad.

Agreeing with Abdel-Gawad, prominent lawyer Ragaie Attia said: “The irresponsibility of these revolutionary youth movements led the vast majority of citizens to seek shelter in a man with a strong personality and who can stand up to these anarchistic elements and contain Islamists. and for them former prime minister Shafiq was this man.”

“Shafiq is half military and half civilian and by no means can be considered a feloul (a Mubarak regime remnant),” argued Attia. According to him, the feloul are the remnants of Mubarak’s defunct ruling National Democratic Party (NDP) and Shafiq was not a member of the NDP. “Shafiq is a statesman who can impose discipline and this is what many Egyptians liked about him.”

At the same time, said Attia, the dismal performance of Muslim Brotherhood and Salafist forces in parliament led many Egyptians to strongly believe that Shafiq could be a counterweight to them. “Egyptians saw how Islamists used their majority in parliament to tailor laws to serve their personal interests and political ends in the form of promoting for Morsi and launching hostile campaigns against Shafiq,” said Attia, adding “but these attacks played into Shafiq’s election campaign instead of harming it.”

Preliminary results of the first round of the presidential race show that Morsi lost to Shafiq in the most densely populated governorates in the Nile Delta region, which has been a Brotherhood stronghold for years. Shafiq won in the governorates of Sharqiya (Morsi’s birthplace), Gharbiya, Daqahliyya and Menoufiya, and he came second after leftist candidate Sagbahi and before Amr Moussa in several other governorates. Attia believes that “This was a kind of collective punishment for the Muslim Brotherhood.” “The message was that the Brotherhood has become very arrogant and only cares about its own interests and for these two reasons citizens voted for Shafiq to direct a strong blow to the group,” said Attia.

Others believe that the strong performance of Shafiq comes from the support of NDP remnants in several governorates, especially in the Nile Delta. In Gharbiya governorate, where Shafiq came first and Morsi came a dismal fifth, it is no secret that several former NDP figures who lost seats in the last parliamentary elections to Brotherhood candidates decided to retaliate using strong familial and tribal connections to beat Morsi. The same is true in other governorates. Sources also believe that several elements of the former state security apparatus joined hands with NDP stalwarts to turn people against Morsi and in support of Shafiq.

Attia, however, does not believe that the support of the remnants of the NDP was a major factor in the end. “I think citizens voted for Shafiq more because of hate of the Muslim Brotherhood than because of the influence of the NDP,” argued Attia, adding “Do not forget that hundreds of families of police officers and military people who faced campaigns of hate and recrimination from the Islamist-dominated parliament in the last four months have pushed them to vote for Shafiq as their best choice.” Many have strong fears that the Muslim Brotherhood aims to infiltrate the army and police and turn them into militias for the group.

In addition to ordinary citizens, the diehards of the NDP, the families of police and military men, Copts also are presumed to have had a big hand in pushing Shafiq to second place. Several semi-official figures put the number of Copts in Egypt at a range between 10 and 15 million. To Abdel-Gawwad, this is a big bloc that can radically change the results of any election. “I think the results of any election would change completely if just five million — or even three million — Copts decided to turn out and cast their votes for a certain candidate,” argued Abdel-Gawwad.

Rami, a Coptic bookseller at Ramses Street in Cairo, said “Christians in general and Copts in particular were highly divided among Shafiq and Moussa." He indicated that “the instructions of the Orthodox Church’s priests and bishops were clear: you have to vote either for Shafiq or Moussa.” Rami added: “I can surely say that at least 80 per cent of Copts voted for Shafiq although Moussa was another very good choice.”

According to him, “most Copts came to the conclusion that Moussa as a president of Egypt would be a weak man who could never be able to stand up to a cunning group like the Muslim Brotherhood.” “By contrast," argued Rami, ”Shafiq is a man with a strong personality, half-military and has always been an open critic of the Muslim Brotherhood and this is what most Copts liked about him.”

Now with the battle lines clear, Rami and many Copts assure that they will turn out by the millions to vote for Shafiq in the second round.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
6



joseph
26-05-2012 10:55pm
0-
0+
good choice
good choice
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
5



rfreakshow
26-05-2012 07:57pm
0-
0+
How?
hmm...maybe because Shafiq is not a barbarian? Maybe because he is not an extremist trying to force what he believes in on millions of people? Maybe because he's trying to advance the country instead of bringing it backwards? Or maybe because he doesn't take advantage of the poor by giving them to eat and persuading them to vote for his militant group...is that good enough for ya? People don't let our nation fade, we have the biggest civilization in history, we are better than this.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
4



Kristina Bergmann
26-05-2012 02:29pm
0-
0+
correspondent
Suddenly copts are so many? Were they not officially always few? But even if they were 10 millions, you should also count that many are children or not able to vote. This stupid analysis makes me think of the one we had in Europe many many years before: Whenever there was an outbrake of plague, it was alledgedly the mistake of the jews. What a stupid analyis!! Only much later people understood, that plague was a simple question of hygiene. But then already houses of jews had burnt and it was too late! Always people want to find a culprit for their problems! Maybe it was not corruption and not copts in Egypt, but the will of many people who wanted Shafiq or Mursi? This is too bad to beaccepted probably. Kristina
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
3



Nikos Retsos
26-05-2012 02:13pm
0-
0+
How did Mubarak's last PM make it to Egypt's first post-revolutionary presidential election run-offs?
I strongly disagree with Gamal Essam El-Din's opinion who seems to conclude that: a) "The Egyptian Revolution was an Egyptian Youth event, brought about by irresponsible lads! b) Now the adult voters who are responsible voted for Ahmed Shafiq for stability! If that is the case, why the adults didn't go to Tahrir Square during the "Youth Revolution," grab their kids from the neck, and take them home to preserve the Mubarak-Shafiq political stability? c) Then, Mr. El-Din adds the "Muslim Brotherhood" scare of an Islamic state as another anathema of the revolution! If we believe Mr. El-Din, we must conclude that the Arab Springs in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, were a curse - not a blessing. And since he concludes that Egyptians now are missing the stability of the Mubarak-Shafik regime, his logic would have the Libyans missing the stability of Gadhafi, and the Tunisians missing the stability of Ben Ali. Nikos Retsos, retired professor, USA
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



mohamed badr
26-05-2012 02:04pm
0-
0+
alahram onlie and fomulation of public openion
al ahram failed in projectin amr musa. it seems same will happen with ahmed shafiq. shafiq will draw his assistants from the army and the police he has no friends outside this circle. he will give promises without knowing how to deliver. that is misleading
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



mohamed badr
26-05-2012 01:56pm
0-
0+
alahram onlie and fomulation of public openion
al ahram failed in projectin amr musa. it seems same will happen with ahmed shafiq. shafiq will draw his assistants from the army and the police he has no friends outside this circle. he will give promises without knowing how to deliver. that is misleading
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.