Last Update 16:6
Sunday, 15 September 2019

Mubarak's NDP versus the Brotherhood: Déjà vu?

For many revolutionaries, the results of the first round of the presidential poll takes them back to square one: having to choose between religious theocracy or a police state

Dina Ezzat, Sunday 27 May 2012
Morsi and Shafiq
Shafiq (L) and Morsi, the two presidential candidates in the second round of Egypt's elections (Photo: Ahram Online)
Share/Bookmark
Views: 4179
Share/Bookmark
Views: 4179

The outcome of the first round of presidential elections, which started for Egyptian expats overseas 11 May and in Egypt 23-24 May, has excluded the two frontrunners of the pre-elections phase: Amr Moussa, who was put first by many opinion polls, and Abdel Moneim Abul-Fotouh, who was routinely placed a close second.

Instead, Moussa, a former foreign minister and Arab League secretary general, lost the bulk of his vote — including the larger part of the Coptic vote and those of the Sufis — to Ahmed Shafiq. For his part, Abul-Fotouh, a former prominent member of the Muslim Brotherhood who was expelled over an early unilateral decision to run in the presidential race, lost many of his presumed supporters among Salafists — whose earlier declared support for the Brotherhood renegade deprived him of a good chunk of the liberal and left-wing vote — to the Brotherhood's candidate, Mohamed Morsi.

Now Shafiq, Mubarak's last prime minister, will face off with Morsi, the Brotherhood's candidate, in an elections second round 16-17 June.

"At the end of the day we are faced with the same old equation of a runner from the Muslim Brotherhood and a runner supported by the defunct NDP (National Democratic Party) and its adjacent forces," commented Amr El-Choubaki, a senior political analyst at Al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies.

The choice is between a rock and a hard place, according to most political analysts and nearly all activists.

Morsi, El-Choubaki further explains, is the candidate of a political Islamic group that has a long and wide base of support but that has shrugged off state laws when it declined to regulate its status as an NGO. This, he says, does not augur well about the kind of state they would seek, "simply because their point of departure is that they are above the law."

Shafiq, for El-Choubaki, is not much of a choice either given that he was the last prime minister of ousted president Hosni Mubarak and is supported by the security apparatus and state bodies that had for long kept the Mubarak regime in power. "One cannot ignore the direct and heavy support that Shafiq received from the base group of the defunct NDP," El-Choubaki comments.

On Saturday, as early results made it clear that it will most likely be Morsi running against Shafiq in June, each side was trying to attract as much support as possible. The Muslim Brotherhood has reached out to all the key presidential runners and to top political figures in an attempt to build a national consensus that could help their candidate make it to the presidential seat as an anti-old regime figure.

However, three of the key former candidates, Hamdeen Sabbahi, Abul-Fotouh and Moussa, declined an invitation Saturday by the Brotherhood to form a united front against Shafiq, saying they found the agenda for the proposed meeting to discuss the matter unclear.

Meanwhile, several political forces said that what they want from the Muslim Brotherhood is honorary seats, such as two vice president positions or some ministerial seats, but a clear commitment in relation to drafting the constitution on a true reconciliatory basis, as well as the adoption of a participatory approach towards state management.

"We had said that we are open to examining all the demands of the national forces and to reach reconciliatory deals," noted leading Muslim Brotherhood figure Essam El-Erian. According to El-Erian, the Brotherhood is trying to assuade fears because it "believes in the true value of a national consensus."

The abovementioned meeting that was scheduled to take place Saturday evening was designed to offer assurances by the Muslim Brotherhood to concerned political forces. "But this meeting has not picked up steam because the Muslim Brotherhood are not showing enough seriousness in committing to the demands of the political forces," said a public figure who has actively supported the national reconciliation line that the Brotherhood is promoting.

Several other public figures offered to cooperate in giving a push to the construction of a national coalition on the basis of the Muslim Brotherhood's commitment to a clear and watertight document whereby all the demands of the national forces are accommodated.

"We have our worries over the intentions of the Muslim Brotherhood, but we cannot overlook the fact that Shafiq is the candidate of the defunct ruling party," said one of the public figures who has been trying to solicit the support of other leading public figures and former presidential runners to join the call of the Muslim Brotherhood.

On the other side of the fence, Abdallah Abdel-Salam, the former member of the NDP and political analyst, told Ahram Online that he sees nothing wrong with the fact that Shafiq has the support of the still-existing machinery of the state as well as key interest groups, including top businessmen of the former NDP.

For Abdel-Sallam, it was Mubarak who was toppled but the state itself survived, and if Shafiq is ultimately elected president then he would have to rule in line with the new political facts on the ground. "Shafiq will not at all try to reinstitute the old regime as many people fear; he would rather try to assure all those who are scared that he is a president of all Egyptians; he will even reach out to some of the revolutionary figures to build up a national consensus," Abdel-Salam forecasted.

A similar line is coming out of Muslim Brotherhood quarters on what Morsi has in mind. "Mohamed Morsi is already making his round of calls with representatives of all national forces to affirm his intention of being a president of all Egyptians, without the exclusion of any political force except those hardcore groups of the ousted regime," said Hamdi Hassan, a key member of the Muslim Brotherhood.

For many revolutionary forces and some mainstream Egyptians, the rule of either Shafiq or Morsi is a nightmare scenario. The Brotherhood or Mubarak's man, as a number of activists and political figures have stated, is a tough choice to make because it represents, for them, a choice between the return of an oppressive and corrupt police state or moving towards a rigid theocracy.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
6



ArmyOfOneAllah
28-05-2012 04:09pm
4-
0+
Liberal / Nationalist Muslims of Egypt?
Can you call yourself a 'liberal' Muslim and NOT want Allah's law to be implemented? The Youth of Egypt 50 years back choose a 'nationalist', and Allah gave them the defeat of 67 and a dictator to boot. The Youth of Egypt Today has to choose now.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
5



Sayed Omar
27-05-2012 09:07pm
0-
3+
What Egypt needs now
The results indicate that Egypt is in a transition and requires a lot of work in the next four years: the constitution, what form of government, reforming the polic force and economic and foreign policies defintion and refinement. The army generals are not going away as long as the country is unstable politically. The people who started the revolution are not organized politically or in goal setting for the future. My feeling is Egypt need some person with previous government experience to navigate thro the next four years. The lesser of two evils is Ahmed Shafik.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Modern_Humaniora
28-05-2012 07:16pm
0-
0+
Less evil?
"The lesser of two evils is Ahmed Shafik." I want to remind you that the Shafiqs, during election campaign, very recently, used violence as a political method during a press conference where evidence was supposed to be revealed on corruption conducted by Mr. Shafiq. This proves that you accept violence as a political method. The Brottherhood rejects violence as a political method. That is a major difference - AND LESS EVIL, ISN'T IT?
4



James Molay
27-05-2012 08:51pm
0-
4+
Why say that Shafiq represents a police state?
If Shafiq is freely elected and if he abides by the consitution and if there is a properly functioning legislature that serves as a wathdog and implements just laws, then there is no police state. But if Morsi is elected and he and the Islamist legislature introduce sharia, then you have theocratic fascism - and they will have a police state to enforce it.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
3



taz
27-05-2012 07:15pm
0-
2+
No to the rule of cabal
shafiq is only one man and can not bring back the past by himself. He faces a popularily elected parliament check his power. Mursi being president is like NDP, monopolising all the country's institutions and this is like going back to the NDB era but even worse because it will be with religious flavour. If Shafiq wins there will be capitol inflow to Egypt and more willingness of the West to help with the transition. The opposite can't hold true. Mursi presidency could lead to isolation Beside we don't to whom is Mursi's loyality , egypt or the Mourshed el Am of the brotherhood. In short, shafiq is much better qualified because of his proven administration prowess, his relationship with the army and his is more presentable as th face of egypt to the world then this Chubby Ahmadinenagad.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



patkar
27-05-2012 02:28pm
2-
5+
what is the choice ?
DRIVE IN THE WALL OR JUMP OFF THE CLIFF
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Modern_Humaniora
27-05-2012 11:34pm
0-
1+
Hard choices?!
The Brotherhood have to make the hard choices as well if this is going to work. Yes - I think the revolution is standing on the fringe of the chasm!
Um Abdullah
27-05-2012 08:53pm
2-
1+
Why are poeple scared of the Brotherhood
Many in Egypt know that the Brotherhood is not a strict religious group. There is little chance that , if they win, they will change Egypt into a Theocratic State.
ibraheem
27-05-2012 06:01pm
8-
5+
drive through the wall
and choose Morsy, instead of Pharon (shafik)
1



shah
27-05-2012 11:39am
16-
10+
election
i trust in ALLAH. I believed The revolution happened for a reason. and i believe it will not be a waste. and i believe Muslim Brotherhood is going to win this against the old regime
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Zaki
28-05-2012 02:46am
0-
1+
Bad choice
but your choice is not going to put Egypt in a better system of government
Ali
28-05-2012 12:43am
0-
1+
What does that mean?
MB wins, revolution is safe???
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.