Last Update 19:57
Tuesday, 12 November 2019

Anacardium state: National schizophrenia and the return of suppressed wills

The ballot box alone will not heal the divided psychological state in Egypt following the January 25 Revolution, brought to a head on 30 June 2013 and thereafter

Hanaa Ebeid , Monday 26 May 2014
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2093
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2093

Anacardium represents a mental/emotional state described in alternative medicine, especially homeopathy, as one of intense inner conflict and double will. It's a condition most close to schizophrenia, and bipolar disorders and signifies a shattered self and all the suffering that it brings therein. It is thus one of the most debilitating states where one is in conflict most with a tormenting self. Anacardium is the botanical name for cashew nuts and the schism in the plant, as in most cashew nuts, symbolises this theme of duality, inner conflict or divided self. 

In a body politic, anacardium, or deep divided states, expectedly follow eras of drastic change and best correspond to the Egyptian psyche in the aftermath of the January 25 Revolution. The extraordinary unitary revolutionary energy soon gave way to sharp contradictions and conflicting dualities reshaping at every point, the most intense of which could be identified as: the revolutionary versus the conservative; and the secular (national) versus the religious.

These contradictions are being shaped by the crossroads situation of the post-revolutionary moment, following decades of automatic or artificial harmony where politics was clinically dead. Hence, the divide itself, or the existence of different political affinities, choices, interests or contesting path/preferences is not the problem per se — politics is in essence about managing differences. It is rather how these differences manifest and are dealt with, which may lead to either a normal or an Anacardium state.

Plurality or heterogeneity is therefore not the core of this condition, nor does the presence of a seeming consensus that has a large or even a majority backing testify to its absence. The sheer numbers of proponents clustering around each differing choice or will, and whether the contradiction comes from a minority or a majority is not telling of a state of consensual health. It is the intensity of the divide, the embedded violence, the denial of the other's existence, rights and moral claims, and the suffering and debilitating state that this "double will" brings, that lies at the heart of the malady.

Under this state of mind, ballots don't mean or matter much. Most elections and polls since the January 25 Revolution yielded at least a two-third majority or a voting in of political actors, choices and paths with significant backing. Despite this apparent consensus, presumably supported by popular will, the shadow will and the left out voice(s) always proved too intense to let any ensuing process develop smoothly, and sabotage has invariably been the name of the game.

An early sign to this divided state was the cashew results of the first presidential elections post-revolution, where the underlying simmering schism denied any claim to even numerical or superficial consensus. However, as in schizophrenic states, each will is only self-conscious and is either totally unaware or despising of the other.

The rhetoric of exclusion in today's Egyptian politics is overwhelming; the "we are the ballots" discourse under the one-year Islamists' rule, has been replaced by "we are the people" since 30 June 2013, whereas the suppressed will decided they were the "denied legitimacy." Totally opaque to the other is what makes the comeback of the shadow or suppressed will most sudden and unexpected, because it was too unheard of and refuted, making its revengeful comeback overwhelming.

In this light can be viewed the massive protest of 30 June leading up to the military ouster of Islamist rule, and the current acts of violence by and against Islamists and proponents of the Morsi regime. What is most concerning about this state is not only the shattered mind. Worse and most dangerous is that morality and emotion is also contested. The most horrible violence or apathy towards cruelty in this sense is perpetrated or justified under the guise of some kind of specific unshared sense of morality. Indifference to the torture or sufferings of the past three years, to the extent of celebrating violence, has invariably been depicted as a service to a higher cause or a one-sided selective morality.

In this sense, most acts of violence have been proclaimed by the custodians of the nation, the guardians of religion, or to a much lesser degree the defenders of a revolutionary dream. The power to inflict violence naturally associates with authority. Psychologically, prospects for cruelty also escalate with authority, especially in imbalanced states. An Anacardium state tends to increase in hardness and violence, as its authority consolidates. This has consistantly applied to the triumphant will vis-a-vis the suppressed or defeated in the aftermath of the revolution — only the severity of violence and its magnitude have been on the rise.

The drama of Rabaa that saw unmatched violence in Egyptian recent history is totally unspoken of outside the circles of Islamists, or is deemed a tribute to the nation, whereas the scene of the hunted military plane by jihadists, celebrating the killing of soldiers in the name of God, are but mere examples of this shattered morality. While Egypt is heading towards new presidential elections with the sureness and confidence of a 98 percent vote for the post-Morsi constitution under 30 June triumphantalism, one only wonders when and how the shadow will(s) could re-emerge with a vengeance!

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
3



Onosha Ugorski
29-05-2014 05:31am
0-
0+
How about Plutonium Nitricum?
I do not think it's necessarily Anacardium, to me it looks exactly like Plutonium Nitricum
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



Dr. Liladhar Pendse
28-05-2014 08:08pm
0-
0+
A well written opinion piece.
I found this opinion piece to be very informative and representative of the dilemma that are faced by the civil society members all over the world. While, I am not qualified to discuss the merit and validity of the reported observation, I can vouch for the state of apathy in the aftermath of violence that can emerge in a civil society, and Egypt by all means is not an exception. The only sad validation that this essay provides me is a view for a non-Egyptian of working of a complicated, and beautiful Egyptian society. Thank you al-Ahram online for sharing.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



J.M.Jordan
28-05-2014 03:46pm
0-
0+
Fixing reality always requires insight of all and common effort.
As one Egyptian put it, Morsi was elected to govern not to change people. Precisely the latter was what he tried to do though. With the known result. The media have much hindered things getting fixed by against better knowledge pretending Sisi'd win anyway and by contesting the latest protest law though as -interim as it surely was meant- it did indeed prevent an even worse state of Egypt. As well as by considering mass death sentence rulings by court as if these were already what would happen in the end which my personal juridic experience tells me they aren't: excuse me, everybody has the right to a personal conviction and this happens to be mine. Beyond this, common effort to get Egypt on its feet again by whatever candidate'll win will unite more than's imaginable today: creating new good facts is the strongest thing of all. However, in democracy a strong election result would be ever so helpful to really arrive there, no country can live on revolutions forever. Work:s needed too!
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.