Last Update 0:25
Wednesday, 13 November 2019

Egypt: Five facts regarding last Friday’s demonstration

Ziad Bahaa-Eldin , Saturday 23 Apr 2016
Share/Bookmark
Views: 4736
Share/Bookmark
Views: 4736

I imagine some senior state officials breathed a sigh of relief once last Friday was over, and with it demonstrations protesting the border agreement between Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Except for some commotion downtown, the day seemed to have passed in peace, with no worrying consequences for the future, and the vast majority of the Egyptian people held their silence and did not participate in the protest, which was limited to overzealous (or paid) youth.

But those who believe this are dreaming and ignoring several facts as clear as day.

The first is that there is a reservoir of untapped anger and resentment on the Egyptian street, stoked not only by the issue of Tiran and Sanafir islands, but the general political and economic mismanagement of the country.

Politically, the mismanagement has given us a parliament without credibility and successive governments that have no decision-making power, disregard the constitution, and stubbornly refuse to address the issue of rights and liberties, especially political prisoners, the continued enforcement of the protest law, and the persecution of civil society organizations.

Economically, the clumsiness and opacity is clear in the continued adherence to a failed strategy to attract investment, the inability to address the tourism crisis, rising prices, and the continued marshaling of national resources for megaprojects with no apparent concern for services and utilities that touch Egyptians’ everyday life.

Second, although Friday’s demonstration brought just a few thousand people to downtown, it was bigger and more diverse than anticipated. It also illustrated the prevailing outlook of today’s youth, who are not deterred by either warnings of Muslim Brotherhood participation or threats of prison.

Third, the fact that people didn’t turn out in large numbers for Friday’s demonstration is less an indication of satisfaction than confusion and reservations about the utility of this form of protest.

People’s experience with the January and June revolutions was tough—the first brought in the Muslim Brotherhood while the second proved unable to put the country back on the democratic path. It’s no wonder, then, that Egyptians are reluctant to embark on a new adventure of uncertain outcome.

This, however, doesn’t mean they are satisfied with the status quo, and it’s not a mandate for the state to continue its current course. It may instead be that the public is watching and waiting, searching for methods of change other than packed demonstrations in public squares.

Fourth, the matter of the islands is not yet over and will not magically disappear. It will continue to plague the state until it settles the issue in a legal way convincing to both the Egyptian and Saudi side.

Referring the issue to the House of Representatives will not resolve it. The state is simply throwing the hot potato to parliament, hoping for a way out of a crisis it created but would rather not solve.

As I said last week, I’m not an expert on public international law, but Am certain the state mismanaged the islands dispute, revealing a reckless disregard for public opinion and a belief that it can continue to govern by surprise, as if there’s no society, parliament, or people.

Fifth and most seriously, the state seems unaware of its growing disconnect from the public. This was clearly demonstrated when the president said on the day of the demonstration that Egypt is carrying out some great projects, but the media ignores them and the public either isn’t following or doesn’t appreciate them.

I have no doubt that the president was genuinely angry and annoyed that the public is ignoring megaprojects currently underway, but as I’ve said repeatedly, it’s not simply a matter of construction projects, no matter how grand. Society, parliament, and the public must be involved—in assessing the importance of these projects and setting priorities—rather than being surprised by them. It only deepens the divide between the people and the state when the latter takes it upon itself to forbid, bestow, and unilaterally determine the interest of the public, leaving them nothing to do but be appreciative.

The growing popular protest sounds a warning to the state that it has lost its way, politically and economically. This time it may have passed in peace, and the same thing may happen on Sinai Liberation Day. But the direction is clear and the anger is growing. There may still be a chance to correct the course and reconstitute state-society relations before it’s too late, but only if those in power listen.

*The writer holds a PhD in financial law from the London School of Economics. He is former deputy prime minister, former chairman of the Egyptian Financial Supervisory Authority and former chairman of the General Authority for Investment.

This article was published in Arabic in El-Shorouq newspaper on Monday, 18 April.

 

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
2



neil
28-04-2016 01:21pm
0-
2+
thumbs up and down from whom?
the comment, that Egypt population increases 2 million a year, and creates 800 new jobs, should be interpreted as sarcastic, tongue-in-cheek, yet gets all thumbs-up, no thumbs down, as if the people 'voting' with their thumbs are evidence that Egypt's education system, or system of incentives and disincentives, is broken.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



Al, Masri
23-04-2016 05:54pm
148-
8+
As if there’s no society, parliament, or people
The Police state concept of ruling a country is exactly that; no society, parliament, or people. Sisi is charting the wrong course focusing only on egotistical mega-projects, emulating what the ruling pharaohs have done for thousands of years; let’s build a new capital, a pyramid or a temple and the gullible masses will follow. The difference today is that the masses are hungry, jobless, and muzzled; they learned how to revolt in 2011 and no police-state jails will keep them at bay.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
J.M.Jordan
26-04-2016 04:03pm
1-
92+
Nothing wrong with megaprojects to cope with demography
The Egyptian people in Egypt alone, without expats, are increasing at a rate of 2 million more each year. How shall all these folks survive if there aren't many many jobs they can sustain themselves and their families with. The shortest way to obtain this, well that's megaprojects. Personally I feel very good about the Siemens deal e.g. as Siemens explicitly promised that the corresponding 800 jobs would be exclusively for Egyptians. Now please tell me what's wrong with that. And why should whoever rules be so little assured of doing precisely the right thing that he'd first have to ask the journalists, the people and the parliament if, please, he may give all his beloved country folks a survival chance..
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.