Last Update 18:23
Friday, 20 September 2019

The media threat to democratisation

The present performance of the Egyptian media presents a serious threat to the democratisation process that must be addressed swiftly through appropriate laws

Mohamed Shuman , Thursday 20 Mar 2014
Views: 1195
Views: 1195

Nobody is satisfied with the performance of the Egyptian media, although we follow it and discuss its impact on society. We wonder about the sources of media financing, its mechanisms, ways of dominating it and using it in distorting people's awareness and manipulating their emotions.  

With all this attention and discussion, nobody has moved to change the nature of the media. We can say that all the parties — government, citizens, media persons, civil society and media experts — as if by common consent left the media chaotic. They even became participants, more or less, and from different positions. However, they didn't embark on a specific act to save the media and protect the audience's rights and public opinion.

The government did nothing but complain about media performance, its disregard for the public interest and disinclination to bear social responsibility. Media professors and experts criticised declining standards in professional performance, deliberate neglect of any codes of ethics, the predominance of businessmen and the indisputable influence of advertising. They suggested many reformist ideas, but no one responded.

There are some media persons who make mistakes unwittingly or deliberately but they live with it because they receive huge sums of money and fame. What is strange is that those media persons criticise media performance as if they aren't active players and participants in the media chaos. More strange still, is that the majority of the audience consumes what the media presents, believing it, agreeing with the dramatising of events, and the claims of instant broadcasting.

Of course, it will be said that consent is part of the masses' submission to the media in the age of images, open skies and globalisation. However, this interpretation is incorrect, because the Egyptian audience is divided and going through a stage of conflict and polarisation. This in turn made the audience follow the media that asserts its persuasions, inclinations and deepens at the same time its schism.

The majority of the audience follows only the media supporting the 30 June Revolution and the political roadmap, while a minority — albeit to be reckoned with — almost boycott the official and private media and doesn't believe anything except Al-Jazeera and its sister channels. Between the two camps, a third camp suffers a crisis of confidence in all what the media presents regarding political events and opinion, and runs away from the flow of information and conflicting, contradictory viewpoints towards the world of entertainment, game shows, cooking shows and drama series.

Audience divisions and fragmentation is a result of the media chaos and the division and polarisation in society is one of the reasons for the media chaos and its transformation to other platforms. These platforms for political and social conflict are built at the expense of professionalism and respecting the audience's right to know the facts, and the clear separation between the news and opinion. Whatever the mutual effect between division and polarisation in the society on the one hand and media chaos on the other hand, it is necessary to recognise that there are Arab satellite channels — with Al-Jazeera and its sisters in its forefront — and foreign channels broadcasting in Arabic that have become a local active party influencing and deepening the rifts between Egyptians, threatening the national interest.

Thus, the media chaos isn't confined to declining standards of professional performance and violating the media code of ethics, but in the increase of the roles of foreign media players amidst the Egyptian audience, and the diminishing effect of the state media to the benefit of the media of businessmen and advertisement agencies.

What is most striking is the silence of the government, the elite and the audience about the chaos itself, which deepens and spreads it within society in a way that makes everyone more accustomed to accept and live with it. There is no doubt that continuing this chaos threatens the nation's interests and the democratisation process, especially when we are about to witness presidential and parliamentary elections. This requires balanced coverage and equal opportunities in the media for all candidates, but it is feared that the media will be biased towards a certain candidate or a political current at the expense of other candidates. At this point we will have a one-voice media or one-eyed media.

I think that the current media chaos makes this the likely scenario, where the media of businessmen will rush towards the candidate who has the power, or will favour the candidate who can spend the most on advertisements.

In short, the integrity and transparency of the climate in which the elections will be held and the electors' access to accurate information about candidates and their programmes can't be guaranteed amid the current media chaos. Consequently, the interim president and the government of Ibrahim Mehleb must act swiftly and decisively to regulate the media. From here I suggest that the interim president and government issue three laws that are necessary for media regulation, to be applied effectively, as follows:

1. A law abolishing the Ministry of Information and transferring its powers to a Higher Media Council, National Agency for Journalism and National Agency for Audio-Visual Media, each concerned with its specialty and in the light of the missions and functions stated in the constitution.

2. A law declaring the formation of a Higher Media Council, National Agency for Journalism and National Agency for Audio-Visual Media, stating that the powers and financing of the three authorities will be for one year. After this year, parliament will revise the law of their formation and working methods in a way that guarantees their independence from the executive power.

3. A law that allows the right of media persons to launch independent syndicates that defend their interests, enable them to self-regulate the profession and formulate a code of ethics, noting that this step was delayed for more than seven months. The roadmap declared on 3 July 2013 stated the importance of "formulating a media code of ethics that guarantees media freedom and realises the rules of professionalism, credibility, impartiality and upholds the best national interests." At the same time, the Journalists' Syndicate may upgrade the existing code of ethics in order to be in harmony with changes in the ownership and administration of the print and electronic press.

My call for swift action to create regulatory and supervisory bodies regarding the media may open the way to mistakes. However, there is no alternative but to make this attempt, in order to preserve national security and save the media from chaos and transform it into a responsible media that will participate with integrity and transparency in the coming elections.

Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

Amanna Fouad
22-03-2014 11:28pm
Sissi wants another 30 years of Mubarak's despotism
The man worships himself, he is a liar, and honesty means nothing to him. His democratic credentials are nonexistent. Just look at the bankruptcy of our justice system. It is a Justice system based on political vengeance vindictiveness against political opponents and concocted charges. How can a non-connformist voice find safety or justice in this jungle? Frankly, I am missing the MB.
Comment's Title

22-03-2014 02:57pm
An Egyptian who has been to the West
There can be no democracy without freedom of the press, freedom of speech, a right to peaceful assembly (without asking government permission first) and the right by a trial by jury (without putting defendants in cages). This is the democracy that the Egyptian people deserve.
Comment's Title
25-03-2014 10:06am
The Terrorists Are The Murderers Of Peaceful Demonstrators.
Allen !!!. Your labeling of MB as terrorists is incredible. Either you are a fan of the coup or you are one them. I love democracy and legitimacy. I hate bringing down a government by military and the start killing people on protests and much worse they are our own citizens. . This is not what we are struggling for. The coup leaders are the terrorists because it is plain evidence on record and the whole of Egypt and the whole world bear witness that the military and the police killed a few thousands since July 2013. You can write or scream to say MB are terrorists but you can't fool all Egyptians and the whole world. You are a bigot of the highest order.
24-03-2014 03:22am
" Susan" it's time for you to face reality.
If you are still in denial that the Muslim brotherhood is anything but a terrorist organization. Then all you have to do besides looking in its lengthy terrorist history, look at their Logo. Two swords to brandish its violence prone identity, and a Koran to exploit its fake affiliation with any sect of Islam or religion.
Suzan Ayyoub
23-03-2014 09:36am
Sisi and supporters represent terror and tyranny.
Allen: you are calling the Islamists "terrorists" because you can't beat them at the ballot box.
23-03-2014 06:20am
If you are comparing the west with Egypt, be objective.
The west does not tolerate home grown terrorists, or terrorist imports. Nor does the west offer legal previllages of any kind. I am sure you have hear dog Guantanamo. But reality or facts never sets in on Muslim brotherhood terrorists. Terrorists are in cages in the west just as terrorists are incarcerated in cages in Egypt. So what is your point?

George Masri
20-03-2014 09:57pm
There can be no free media under tyrannical and fascist regimes
Let us not kid ourselves. We should also be honest enough to acknowledge that the Sisi coup undermined not expedited the democratic process in Egypt. Yes, the Islamists were not perfect. However, under Mursi's brief era, Egyptians could protest without the risk of being shot dead. And the justice system more or less functioned as it should. Nowm, the justice system is a clarion dcandal.
Comment's Title
25-03-2014 03:03pm
MB is sectarian
MB in the end is a Sunni Islamic organization. And like its isster the Shia sect it has extremism in its tradition. Its naive to think Al Azhar is any different. There is no real religious reformation in Egypt and elsehwere in the Arab world. Therefore the problem will contue.

© 2010 Ahram Online.