Last Update 22:46
Thursday, 24 October 2019

Egypt's pharaonic temples exhibited abroad relate their stories

Former president Gamal Abdel-Nasser gave away pharaonic temples as thanks for help saving Abu Simbel and other Nubian monuments - Ahram Online investigates whether he was correct to do so

Mohammed Elrazzaz – Barcelona, Spain, Tuesday 26 Jun 2012
Ancient Egyptian collection at the MET
Views: 4310
Views: 4310

What do New York, Madrid, Leiden and Turin have in common? 

As strange as it sounds, all four cities have pharaonic temples. While some Egyptians like to think of these temples as ‘cultural ambassadors’ abroad, others tend to feel uneasy about the fact that Egyptian heritage could be ‘gifted’ without the stakeholders (Egyptians) being consulted.

It was Nasser’s idea to give away Nubian temples to four of the countries that had helped save Abu Simbel and other Nubian monuments in one of history’s most challenging heritage rescue initiatives. In a previous article published by Ahram Online I told the tale of one of these temples, and now I go on with the rest of the story.

A Meeting with Isis and Osiris in New York

New York is a jungle of museums and galleries that lend the city an unparalleled cultural glamour. It is a strange feeling to contemplate an entire pharaonic temple exhibited in a hall inside one of these museums, but such is the case with Dendur, and it is not just any museum: It is the MET (Metropolitan Museum), one of the world’s most outstanding museums.

The temple, as small and aesthetically insignificant as it is, is eclipsed by other parts of the MET, including the Ancient Egyptian collection, but there is something about it that haunts the viewer: the fact that you can see two of the idols of the ancient world, Isis and Osiris, in a modern building symbolic of the ‘New World'.

The temple dates back to the reign of Augustus Caesar (15 BC), and like most of the temples built around that time, it lacks grandiosity and monumentality. However, a man standing next to me was making generous comments about the temple being a marvel: “That thing must be some five-hundred years old!” he said. I could not help correcting him: “it is actually over two thousand years old.”

“Two thousand you say? Man! That’s older than Columbus!”

A more serious point of view came from Jonathan Cape (physician) when I asked his opinion of the temple:

- “I like to think of the legacy left by ancient civilizations as world heritage, and if it’s world heritage, then we are all stakeholders, and we should not make a big fuzz about its presence here.”

- “But don’t you think it is completely out of place here? Like a dead fossil in a glass bowl?”

- “Well, better a dead fossil than no fossil at all!”    

But Dendur is not the only such ‘fossil’.

Resurrection in Leiden

Leiden is a Dutch city famous for its rivers and canals. Not far from one of these canals, the Rijksmuseum van Oudheden museum is where you can visit the Temple of Taffeh, also from the era of Augustus.

Unlike the Temple of Debod in Madrid, which is exposed to the weather extremes and polluted air of the Spanish capital, the Temple of Taffeh has undergone magnificent reconstruction and conservation work.

First, over 650 blocks (weighing 250 tonnes) had to be transported from Aswan to Leiden. Second, special care had to be given to the relatively delicate sandstone, which meant the temple had to be rebuilt inside the Museum and not in some open-air garden or court. Finally, the temple was rebuilt in a way adapted to the Dutch climate, allowing daylight to illuminate it in a controlled way through a weatherproof shelter.

Now it stands at the purpose-built central hall of the museum, being the jewel of its collection. Not bad for a temple that, since the late Middle Ages, served as residence for people and even a barn for animals.

Other important pieces in the Museum’s Egyptian Collection include a rare blue wine bowl depicting a female lute player, as well as a statue of a scribe from the third millennium BC and the beautifully painted coffin of the mummy of Peftjauneith (650 BC).

Back to the temple, a closer look would reveal the Christian use of the temple as indicated by a carved cross and some Greek inscriptions, but that is not the most interesting part. According to my Dutch friend, Nico Overmars (Leiden-based architect), the cult of Isis is still alive! The hall where the temple is exhibited can be hired for private events, and there are rumours about high profile visitors that hire the hall and engage in rituals of veneration of the ancient goddess to whom the temple was dedicated originally. Nico does not know that for sure, but “people speculate” as he put it.

Turin, on the way to Thebes

“The road to Memphis and Thebes passes through Turin.” Jean-François Champollion

Champollion, the famous decoder of the hieroglyphs, spent much time in Turin, famous historically for the Shroud of Turin, quenching his passion for Egyptology. His quote makes perfect sense when we know that Turin is home to the world’s second largest Ancient Egyptian collection.

Thutmose III never would have guessed that the temple he had consecrated some 3500 years ago between the first and second cataracts in the Nile to please the Nubians would one day be transported to please the citizens of another nation born centuries later. The Temple of Ellesiya is part of the collection of the Museo Egizio in Turin, Italy.

The museum owes its collection to successive purchases and acquisitions by Italian kings, and a considerable part of the objects come from the Italian excavation missions in Egypt during the first third of last century, thanks to the efforts of Maspero’s apprentice, Ernesto Schiaparelli. At the time, the finds were shared between the discoverers and the Egyptian state. At the moment, the museum owns over 30,000 objects, only 20 per cent of which are exhibited. Among the most prized pieces in the collection are the diorite busts of Ramses II and Thutmose III, as well as the mummy, mask and toilet box of Merit from the New Kingdom.

The Temple of Ellesiya is a ‘pale’ temple, in the sense that most of its wall relief work was lost and its colours gone following the construction of the Aswan Dam in 1902 (and the subsequent flooding of the Temple). Originally, it was hewn out in a mountain side, but as part of the 1960s UNESCO campaign, and just like the Temple of Taffeh, it was dismantled and later reassembled in Europe. The façade is far from impressive, but this does not change Daniela Antonini’s opinion a bit. This young Italian curator tells me that “the temple is precious. It is ours because we earned it. It belongs here because Italians are crazy about Ancient Egypt and they showed it over and again…Italy gave the world some of the best Egyptologists ever, like Schiaparelli, Drovetti, Barsanti, and ‘The Great Belzoni’! Belzoni alone would have been justification enough.”

These ‘justifications’ still do not convince Ahmed El-Bakri, a Turin-based entrepreneur who thinks that “Nasser could have done it differently. Instead of giving away our heritage, he could have granted citizens of these countries visa-free entry to Egypt for a number of years.”

The debate is far from over.

Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

07-09-2012 12:10pm
Pharaonic heritage is considered world heritage. The objects and buildings are nobody's "material possesion". But they live "in the mind" of almost every person in the world. And everybody has a duty to protect this unique and priceless heritage that the pharaohs left behind for humankind. Salvaging Abu Simbel was a joint international effort and the biggest peaceful operation known in the history of mankind. People tend to forget this wonderful unique story. So I, personally think that Nasser was a man with great vision and an open mind to the outside world. His gift to the donor nations will keep this unique story of union and peace between the nations alive. In fact Nasser added an extra layer to the legacy of these tempels. They tell all the visitors: Yes, it can be done, we can work together peacefully! I am very thankful to Egypt and its people that I love more than any other in the world.
Comment's Title

Arizona Flame
24-07-2012 02:28pm
All Heritage deserves Dignity and Respect
Somehow, I do not believe Americans would so generously give away our historical heritage and monuments. Yes, I did say "Heritage". Why should we give away a great American Indian burial site? It is just as appalling if we were to give away our monument dedicated to our victims of 911. Each country is rightfully proud or protective of certain events and cultures found deep in their part of the world. It is their heritage. Personally, even during scientific studies, I believe all remains should be treated with the dignity and respect of burial sites.
Comment's Title

02-07-2012 09:11am
Why Not Overseas?
If it means that those that are essentially "Egypt" can be kept in a safe environment, whilst reaching an even greater audience - thus promoting Egypt and Egyptology, i say, why not? The Egyptian Museum in Cairo is in such bad shape since the uprising. So, there is no merit in arguing that these effects should return to Egypt, only to be chucked in a corner of a dingy old "museum", which improper narration.
Comment's Title

© 2010 Ahram Online.