Last Update 9:9
Ancient activity identified by new mapping method at Senefru pyramids in Egypt's Dahshour
A new topographical mapping method, based on fractals, is revealing new information about ancient activity at pyramid sites in Egypt
Nevine El-Aref , Saturday 4 Aug 2012
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2012


Red pyramid
Bent pyramid

Some 4500 years ago King Senefru founded the 4th Dynasty and set off building a pyramid to preserve his body for the afterlife and eternity. After a failed attempt, Senefru succeeded in building the first ever complete pyramid in Dahshour area, 40 kilometres south of Cairo.

Nature subsequently erased all traces of ancient human activity in Dahshour; even archaeological excavations revealed very little of what went on at the Dahshour site during the construction of the Bent and Red pyramids.

The Bent Pyramid was Senefru’s failed attempt, and is unique in shape. It represents a transitional period when the architectural style of a tomb changed from a flat mastaba to a step pyramid and finally a complete pyramid. The Red Pyramid is a true smooth-sided pyramid.

To know human practices at the Senerfru pyramid area, a team of earth scientists from Germany examined fractals (natural or artificial created geometric patterns that form designs) at the area around the Dahshour pyramids.

According to the scientific journal Quaternary International, Ame Ramisch of the Freie Universitat Berlin and colleagues from the German Archaeological Institute in Cairo created a digital model of the topography around Dahshour and investigated the area using fractal pattern recognition analysis.

Investigations revealed that the area is filled with natural and man-made fractal areas as well as a huge non-fractal footprint around the pyramids.

Research identified that an area almost six kilometres long was modified during the Old Kingdom and no evidence of natural fractals, which suggests that the site was once a wide promenade.

“The modification is hard to spot, especially if your eyes are untrained,” says Ramisch. “Even with trained eyes, it is difficult to believe the gigantic footprint the Egyptians have left.” Ramisch told New Scientist magazine.

The disturbance to natural fractals can give a sense of what occupied the site. In this case, Ramisch continued, it was probably broad terraces several kilometres long, which would have "increased the sense of monumentality of the pyramids.”

Keith Challis of the University of Birmingham commented on the discovery in the New Scientist, describing it as “a new approach.” There is a well-established link between human activity and landscape modification, he pointed out. "This provides an interesting new way of identifying such modification."

Dahshour also houses the remains of the 12th Dynasty pyramid of King Amenemhat II as well as the pyramid complex of King Sesostris III, which includes his pyramid and a smaller one of royal woman and a gallery tomb for his daughters.

The Black Pyramid of King Amenemhat III and a collection of disturbed tombs from the 13th Dynasty and the pyramid of the 13th Dynasty King Ameny Qemau are also in the vicinity.





Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 4000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
1



Sirwilhelm
11-08-2012 04:09pm
0-
2+
Interpreting the pyramids
There are often different ways of looking at evidence, most of which are controversial, because they go against accepted dogma. It's assumed the smaller pryamids were built before the Great Pyramid, and it's two companions, because it fit's evolutionary theory. The smaller periods evolved into the larger, more evolved pyramids. But, there is evidence that the Great pryamid was built first, it is older than Kuhfu. That Kuhfu acknowledged it's presence, but never claimed he built it. The smaller pyramids were built later, with diminishing skills lost over time, until the bent pyramid demonstrated they could no longer emulate the earlier builders. Competing theories should be healthy for true science. Whatever evidence that is gathered, should not be forced to fit any one theory.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Richard F Weaver
25-08-2012 03:56pm
0-
1+
The Great Pyramid
As long as the experts keep the year of construction to the year of Cheops's death then there will be no progress on the real meaning of the pyramids. It is obvious they are much older than our historians say. we must remember that the sphinx has been protected from wear & tear by the constant covering of the desert sands.If you read "We Are Our Ancestors" in chapter eight there is another theory as to why and how it was built.

© 2010 Ahram Online. Advertising