Last Update 11:10
Monday, 26 August 2019

Government on the hunt for sharks

Environmentalists and Egyptian authorities are at odds over the fate of Egypt's sharks

Saturday 11 Dec 2010
sharks
Share/Bookmark
Views: 5514
Share/Bookmark
Views: 5514

Eye witnesses say more than two of the threatened oceanic whitetip and mako sharks were hunted by officials recently in their search for the sharks thought to have caused one death and five injuries off the caost of Sharm El Sheikh last week.


“I don't like the idea of random killing, there is no justification, aside from the fact that it is illegal. You can catch them and transport them, then the chances of their survival outside the sea are very limited, but if they survive, how can you restrict their movement? Relocating them is not an answer to the problem,” says Elke Bojanowski, of the Hurghada Environmental Protection and Conservation Association (HEPCA).

The answer to the crisis according to Bojanowski and other eviromentalists is to study the sharks’ behaviour and see what has changed with the usually peaceful and confident sharks.

Several factors might have contributed to the disturbance of an otherwise healthy marine feeding cycle. Among these is the high temperature  and overfishing. “Fishing for eating is not a problem, but fishing using nets, and fishing in threatened places, fishing for small fish, and fishing for inedible types of marine life is the problem,” says an environmentalist who wished to remain anonymous, who added that the limit for fishing in the Red Sea should be 3000 tons a year, but is currently at 25,000 tons a year.

Besides fishing, feeding and baiting while snorkeling is also thought to have triggered unusual reactions from the sharks.

Although shark biting incidents have occurred in the Red Sea region throughout the last six years, and included the death of a French woman in June last year, researchers insist the recent attacks are a surprise.

“Last year it was one case, it was nothing like this. No one had any reason to see this coming. This is a much more complex situation because there has been no meticulous study of shark behaviour with humans," says Bojanowski.

Many disagree with how the Egyptian government is dealing with the situation. Some environmentalists withdrew from the committee formed to deal with the crisis because of its “unscientific and disorganized attitude” claims one environmentalist who wished to remain anonymous.

According to Bojanowski, the media has done a lot of damage by publishing “sensationalist headlines and horrifying photos.”  

Bojanowski insists that hunting the sharks is not a solution because it is still not known how many sharks were responsible for the attacks, or what provoked them. Even the one Oceanic Whitetip shark that everyone was sure did two of the attacks was seen interacting with divers recently. “No one can really tell what is going to happen, it is a very unusual situation that has never happened before,” says Bojanowski who likened swimming in the sea to crossing the street - there is always a minimal risk involved.


Witnesses saw a female Oceanic Whitetip shark right before the first two attacks. The shark was photographed when a woman was attacked several days later. During that attack, the woman, who was identified as a 70-year-old German national, died on Sunday after the shark bit her thigh and severed part of her arm.

Egyptian authorities are concerned that the shark attacks will be problematic to the tourism industry. Many tourists are cancelling their bookings and Russian tourism has dropped by 20 per cent.

A ban on swimming in Sharm El Sheikh, was set on Sunday after the German tourist was attacked.

Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
3



Jessica
13-12-2010 08:25am
0-
0+
needless killing
I don't agree with this at all. You might as well go out into the woods and kill all the bears and cougars because they are 'dangerous' and can't be 'relocated'. The sea as well at the woods are an animals habitat, not peoples personal playgrounds, in which we can move whatever we want to take what we want.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



nikegirl2012
12-12-2010 07:04pm
0-
0+
Other alternatives
I understand that they are trying to avoid damage to the tourist industry but, sometimes, it is more important to do something for the environment than for the money. Just keep the people away from the sharks. If that means no diving or swimming in the Red Sea, so be it. Why is it more important to make money than to let the sharks be? It's like going into someone's house and killing them because they are in your way.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



A. Shawki
11-12-2010 08:26pm
0-
0+
Objective reporting.
This issue needs a cool headed scientific approach to minimize the damage to the tourist industry and maintain the Egyptian Red Sea as a world class destination for sports diving. You are to be commended on you objective reporting. Thank you
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.