Last Update 21:59
Monday, 18 November 2019

Allies against Arab resistance and democracy

Arab elites, the US and Israel work together to oppose democracy in the Arab world and denigrate the Palestinian resistance

Mohamed Elmenshawy , Wednesday 20 Aug 2014
Views: 1577
Views: 1577

An alliance in international relations means a concord or a pledge between two or more powers to reach common objectives and interests, or to confront a shared danger. Since the first signs of the Arab Spring three and half ago, an unofficial and unannounced international concord came into being for the purpose of opposing cries for change and renewal expressed by millions across the Arab World.

The latest Israeli aggression on Gaza allowed the same alliance to re-appear, which had never vanished, this time targeting the Palestinian resistance. This alliance against Arab democracy and resistance includes states and powers that have different intellectual and ideological approaches. It comprises major countries, Arab states, traditional political elites, capital owners, in addition to Israel.

The United States, as the key representative of the major countries in this alliance, refused Arab democracy in words and deeds. Washington begrudged, and still does, the Arab's right to enjoy the same democracy which citizens of free countries around the world enjoy.

The Egyptian case is an obvious one of American hypocrisy. The standpoint of the Obama administration is not new, for more than three decades Washington pretended to support the aspirations of the Egyptian people for freedom and democracy and at the same time backed an autocratic dictatorship. It is understandable that Washington prefers dealing with Arab dictatorships, which is far easier than tackling elected governments that are accountable to their people.

Washington is hostile to Palestinian resistance, for since the beginning of the aggression on Gaza, the American administration, consistent with its history, adopted a standpoint that is in total support for Israel. The American media is brimful of a vision similar to the one the administration believes in; it is based on Israel's defence against unprovoked attack. And it neither mentions anything about the occupation nor people's right to resist the occupier of their land.

The alliance also includes Arab states whose rulers are well-known for not believing in democracy in theory, content or practice. These rulers exploit their  wealth to support efforts to strangle Arab democracy and invest billions of dollars in order to thwart the emerging democratic attempts in Egypt or Tunisia or any other country that becomes acquainted with a real democratic path.

The rulers of these countries consider Arab democracy an existential threat to their thrones and regimes. The latest aggression on the Gaza Strip showed that these rulers are antagonistic towards the Palestinian resistance as well. News reports revealed secret meetings between Arab Gulf rulers and Israeli ministers before the launch of the aggression. Moreover, the presence of Mohammed Dahlan in Abu Dhabi and the desire, in his ascension to the Palestinian Authority presidency, to set the scene for an agreement with Israel is a good reason for those rulers to adopt options aiming to destroying the resistance option.

As for Israel, it would be the first to be harmed by Arab democracy, especially the democracy of its big neighbour Egypt. Israel was actively present at discussions in Washington three years ago concerning the revolution in Egypt. Israel and its lobby expressed apprehensions regarding the possibility of an Egyptian government antagonistic to Israel. Israel demanded that Washington not forsake president Hosni Mubarak, their mutual strategic ally. Israel believes a democratic Egypt equals a strong Egypt and it is better for her to deal with a strong ruler who neither believes in democracy and freedom nor in the Palestinian resistance option.

Israel seeks to destroy the Palestinian resistance option through diffusing despair in the souls of the Palestinian people by tarnishing the resistance fighters. This approach is promoted vehemently in the framework of what I call the "Ramallah Option". This option is based on showing the luxurious life accompanied with good economic development in the city of Ramallah, with the media focusing on the high consumption rates and the availability of goods and commodities in comparison with Gaza. Of course, Israel attempts to blame the hardships of life in Gaza on the resistance not the occupation policies.  

As for the connection between the Egyptian and Arab economic elite and the United States, it is a contributing element making it difficult to achieve any real change. The businessmen, who benefitted and are still benefitting from policies that allowed them to enter the American market whether as exporters via the Qualifying Industrial Zones (QIZ) or as importers serving the significant interests of American wheat producers, have stable interests and they represent a strong lobby against any popular desire for change. This segment is antagonistic towards resistance. This is demonstrated via media diffusing hostile messages about the Palestinian resistance.  

It is not a coincidence that the aforementioned powers move singly or collectively to achieve certain objectives. This alliance appears quite obviously in the American capital through promoting the unreadiness of Arabs for democracy on one hand, and tarnishing the image of Palestinian resistance on the other. The lobbies and some Arab embassies work in earnest towards this aim backed by the Zionist and business lobbies.

Finally, it should be remembered that what was mentioned does not mean that all the resistance and its backers are democratic powers and also it does not mean that all the democratic powers are supporters of the resistance. However, the connection between them exists due to reasons related to serving the interests of small segments of the Arab population at the expense of the great majority of people.


Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

Hilal Nour, Cairo
22-08-2014 04:57am
OF course there are conspiracies...America and Israel are behind failed democracy in Egypt
Doesn't Israel say openly Sissi is our man in Cairo What is this supposed to mean?
Comment's Title
31-08-2014 02:36am
Egyptian Genrals are responible
The big enemy of the egyptions are the Military generals of egyptian army, including the arab rulers. Israel has the right to do everything backed by USA as this is the basic enemy and not be blamed

Sam Enslow
20-08-2014 01:03pm
Insult to Egyptian people
There is an old saying, "We have seen the enemy, and he is us." This article implies that the Egyptian people are too lazy and ignorant to understand their own country. It also impies that those who claim to be masters in Egypt have no answers for Egypt's problems so look for others to blame. It is still, "It is not us. Some conspiracy is working against us." There are also two other old saying worth mentioning, "All politics are local," and, "It's the economy, Stupid." Point fingers all you want.Thump your chests all you want. Remember all you want. The lack of electricity and its effects on businesses and individuals is the major threat facing Egypt today. This directly affects the lives of all Egyptians. It is an Egyptian problem to be solved by Egyptians. There is no outside conspiracy involved. The people of Egypt want results - not excuses.
Comment's Title
Ron Hersh
28-08-2014 06:03am
We'll put Sam. The world needs more like you raising their collective voices and encouraging Egyptians to take control of their destiny and look in the mirror when things aren't working well.

© 2010 Ahram Online.