Last Update 11:30
Sunday, 20 May 2018

Welcome to AIPAC: Where words lose all meaning

James Zogby , Saturday 10 Mar 2018
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2338
Share/Bookmark
Views: 2338

You need to prepare yourself for language shock before listening to speeches at the annual convention of AIPAC, the Israel lobby. Speaker after speaker will use words that you think you understand, but they will use them in ways that so distort their meaning that the experience will leave you exhausted or exasperated.

On the opening day, for example, the group's new president, Mort Fridman and a former Democratic governor, Jennifer Granholm, wreaked havoc with the word "progressive."

Motivated by recent polls showing that Israel has lost support among Americans on the left, Fridman issued an appeal to progressives to recognize that "the progressive narrative for Israel is... compelling." And Granholm, building on this theme, declared that "as a progressive" she supports Israel as "a nation that provides universal health care... protects women's rights and LGBT rights. It's a progressive's paradise."

What both speakers deliberately ignored is the reality that this "paradise" has become an apartheid state that occupies and oppresses millions of Palestinians whose rights are denied, lands are confiscated, and daily lives have become a hell on earth.

Not only that, but as Israel's government moves further to the right it is mired in corruption, violates religious freedom, and embraces Donald Trump. It is at best, a stretch to call them "progressive." The word means something and it doesn't mean Israel.

I was also struck by Ambassador Nicki Haley's description of the United Nations as "bullying Israel" because the world body repeatedly passes resolutions condemning Israeli practices in the occupied territories. Once again, reality is being turned on its head.

It's not the UN that bullies Israel, its Israel that is bullying the Palestinians by repeatedly violating international law and conventions. Because the UN is the body that established Israel and set the terms for "a just and lasting peace," it remains the address for complaints with Israeli behavior. Palestinian recourse to the world body then isn't bullying, it's appropriate.

It also takes more than a little chutzpah for speakers addressing AIPAC to call the UN a bully, since the Israel lobby has long relied on the U.S. Congress to bully Palestinians with repressive and often humiliating legislation, while simultaneously arming and giving a blank check to Israel which it uses to systematically violate Palestinian rights.

Then there's the Orwellian talk about "peace, two states and negotiations," none of which bears any relationship with reality. Israel's governing coalition no longer supports a two-state solution. For years, they pretended to endorse this outcome but did so with terms that made it impossible to achieve.

Israeli leaders claimed to want "negotiations without preconditions leading to two states," but then proceeded to lay out conditions like: settlement remain, no consideration of refugees' right to return, no compromise on Jerusalem, and continued Israeli control over the Jordan Valley and access and egress on all borders.

Meanwhile, in the two decades since Netanyahu was first elected, the settler population has quadrupled as they continued to expand their settlement enterprise in the occupied territories. In the end, it appeared that Israel's embrace of two states was more a stalling tactic or a fig leaf to mask their aggressive conquest of the entire land and their permanent subjugation of the Palestinian people.

In the face of this reality, it was a bit of a farcical "too little, too late" for the new AIPAC president to declare his organization's support for two states and then lament that this goal was probably unattainable due—he of course added—to Palestinian failures. That Fridman was quickly rebuked by members of the Israeli governing coalition was a clear indication that Israelis have become so emboldened they no longer feel the need for a fig leaf to cover for their ill intent.

The topsy-turvey world of AIPAC's use of language was writ large in the juxtaposition of two signs advertising an event on "freedom of the press." Outside the room was a screen that announced the session "Free Speech and Freedom of the Press in Israel." Above it was another sign stating that "This session is off the record and closed to press." No further comment is necessary.

If this weren't enough to set sane minds reeling in confusion or consternation, there were the bizarre claims about "Israel's moral army" or the need to confront "Palestinian fake news” about the occupation army's mistreatment of Palestinian children or how Israel is on the verge of peace with its Arab neighbors, if it were not for the pesky Palestinians who keep getting in the way.

Keeping with this "up is down and down is up" approach is newly revised AIPAC-supported "Israel Anti-Boycott Act." When it was initially proposed, the bill was condemned by civil libertarians as a violation of protected free speech.

The AIPAC fix was to add language saying that "nothing in this Act ...shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment." The problem is that the language is non-binding and in no way, affects the binding provisions of the bill that continue to call for punishments for honoring the boycott of Israel. In other words, "we won't be violating your First Amendment rights, but we will."

The problem with all of this is that there are true believers in this upside-down fantasy world created by AIPAC and its Israeli partners. The audience of the faithful cheer for the distortions they are being fed. The Members of Congress fall all over themselves announcing their willingness to jump through more AIPAC hoops designed to demonstrate their loyalty to Israel.

Thankfully, the story doesn't end here. Polls are showing that there is some promising movement in public opinion on issues involving Israel and the Palestinians. Republican opinion, driven by right-wing evangelical Christians and neo-Conservatives, remain under Israel's sway.

Democrats, on the other hand, are divided in their support for Israel, with young and minority voters no longer buying the AIPAC-created narrative and increasingly more supportive of Palestinians. This deadly contest between reality and illusion will continue.

The writer is President of the Arab American Institute
 

Search Keywords:
Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's
Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
Latest

© 2010 Ahram Online.